The left need to be held to account for their actions. Their employers should know who’s working for them.
They have cost the right jobs, with families worried because they were fired over a view.
It’s time to level the playing field.
“Let’s ruin his life.”
Names him. Names his workplace. Tags his employer. Demands he’s fired.
Aren’t these the same people who spend half their lives complaining about “doxxing” and people trying to destroy others’ livelihoods?
Apparently it’s only wrong when it happens to them.
Police think tank calls for new law after staff groups enter political disputes
Britain’s police risk appearing partisan if staff associations keep speaking out on contested political and religious issues, a new Policy Exchange report has concluded.
The think tank wants Parliament to pass a Police Impartiality Act and either abolish staff networks or confine them to supporting their own members.
The study focuses on the National Association of Muslim Police and similar associations inside individual forces.
Investigators say those groups have moved well beyond workplace welfare and into public argument over Israel, Hamas and counter-terrorism language.
One example is a paper issued last year by NAMP. It treated accounts of Hamas atrocities on 7 October as “unverified stories,” labelled the Israeli military a “Zionist terrorist group,” and drew a comparison between Israel’s war in Gaza and the Holocaust. NAMP later took the document down and said the author, a former vice-president, no longer works for the association or in policing. It also said it does not defend Hamas or any banned organisation and condemns terrorism.
The report points to other episodes. The Metropolitan Police’s Muslim association invited Palestinian diplomat Husam Zomlot to address its annual meeting. In the West Midlands, the vice-chair of the local Muslim police association also holds a counter-terrorism role, which the authors say raises an obvious conflict of appearance.
About one in five forces in England and Wales now has a Muslim staff association. Policy Exchange argues the pattern is wider than one community: more than 200 staff networks operate across British policing, and too many have begun taking sides on policy.
The recommended law would spell out impartiality duties for chief constables, officers, civilian staff and any body linked to a force. If networks survive, the report says they should lose public money and official time, publish accounts and minutes, and stay out of political campaigning.
Supporters of the paper include former Equality and Human Rights Commission chair Baroness Falkner and former head of counter-terrorism policing Peter Clarke.
They say the public must be able to trust that the police serve the law, not a cause.
👇🏻 @RestoreBritain@RupertLowe10 is the one and only way to get this country back to how it once was!! We need mass deportations! Millions must go! Bring back the death penalty! 🫡 🇬🇧