@1MaxMclean Today Wes Streeting calls out “incredible vested interests” resisting the replacement of NHSE. It is clear that elements of the NHS are out of control in using, wasting, NHS resources to protect their personal interests. Look at Max’s case, a clear abuse of position by the CEO.
@Anna_Soubry Had they done it? Were they not just playing the system? What fees do you get from the case? No mention of victims? You know what is really wrong with the system, lawyers milking it.
@Alverd_Dralshya@DreyfusJames I think you will find that ‘trans’ is a long time abbreviation if transvestite. A teansvestite woman is a man in women’s clothing. Not sure the word transgender existed 20 years ago, when being transvestite was widely used.
@VeritaUK Verita will willingly conceal your mistakes and even your cover up activities, for the right price. Procurement rules? Who cares about them. An organisation I can show has zero integrity and ethics and simply leeches off incompetent NHS management structures. Happy to share.
@ClintClease There was also overwhelming evidence she was guilty; two juries and the Appeal Court saw it. What sort of country releases murderers on a slanted PR campaign?
@drphilhammond So, you accept it’s not true that the case against LL was so flawed ‘everyone agrees’. People are telling you the evidence against her was reliable, well understood and agreed. You repeatedly claim the opposite.
@drphilhammond@PrivateEyeNews You misunderstand, mis-state the process. Myers team tried but couldn’t find experts who could make such claims under cross examination. The idea a leading KC team ‘missed the obvious’ in such a case is like a Dr missing a gaping wound in a patient’s forehead.
@SCynic1 In fairness to KS, Barbara Mills was the DPP who created the culture of the CPS ‘pursuing no case unless very sure of winning’. The period 1998-200+ saw thousands of victims denied justice on specious ‘evidential’ grounds.
@journolj Did you know the defence can ask multiple experts for an opinion and then not tell the prosecution about any of them except the helpful one. The prosecution must disclose all experts they speak to. Weird, isn’t it? Happens in lots of big cases.
@journolj Expert in saying confessions not reliable says confession not reliable. What else would he say? Why, when interviewed under caution and much later when giving evidence, didn’t she say what is now being claimed, three years late/later?
@Positively4thS Did I miss something? I thought she had been convicted twice and twice found to have no grounds to appeal. What court or process has overturned her conviction? Or do you mean you think she is innocent because of what you have chosen to read? Idiot Wind?
@ContrarianJolly More incoherent ramblings demonstrating a complete failure to understand a trial process and evidence, let alone the ongoing responsibilities of prosecution parties and witnesses who are obliged to suffer in silence or speak at risk of losing their recognition.
@hibsboy69 Unlike you, they read all the evidence and devised the best strategy their extensive experience could come up with, but failed to convince the jury, who also heard all the evidence deemed relevant. All the evidence, not selected and distorted snapshots.
@drcmday No, the NHS is abusing its resources and the legal system to cover up managers’ wrongdoing. Its ’deeper pockets’ strategy prevents most cases even reaching hearings. Not only is a duty of candour needed, personal liability should be introduced.