@NoamShazeer Mac: "What can you do with seven billion that you can't do with four?"Gin: "I'm not who you think I am, Mac."Mac: "I hope not. For your sake."
As pointed out in your analysis, the retrofit path is challenging. These challenges translates to costs. If Tesla is going to retrofit hw3 they would not just retrofit for fsd owners but would consider for the whole hw3 fleet. The whole fleet is into the millions. Elon said himself for retrofit to work there needs to be โmobile factories/facilitiesโ. This translates to capex. The roi on the hw3 retrofit capex is nonexistent (what st $100 a month of *potential sub). Ppl who doesnโt use fsd hw3 now will never use and never sub and never pay to retrofit. Therefore, Tesla would just be burning money in an incinerator to do hw3 retrofit, whereas they could deploy those capital to capex like Terafab. And they already planned 2.5b in capex already. Thereโs no free capital to deploy retrofits. So retrofits is like the lowest priority in a business sense. Pure business decision. Ppl will continue to buy Teslas. Hw3 waiting for retrofit is just wishing and dreaming.
I have also experienced this late braking numerous times. Following through a completed priority left turn signal is also a MAJOR issue. HW3 will also decides on its on to run a red because it believe itโs a stale red/or power outage or something. It also cannot do flashing green lights. It will also major brake stab if it sees burn out marks on the road. The list goes on and on.
There is no other remedy other than a FULL RETROFIT.
https://t.co/UfmTTjuqA8
This is why HW3 fsd is unsafe. 12.6.4 tried to followed vehicle in front in a left turn prioritized signal after it ended. It didnโt attempt to slow down and you can see (I felt) the steering wheel turned before I slammed on the brakes.
BREAKING
The Parliamentary Budget Officer has revealed that nearly 74,000 REJECTED asylum claimants are entitled to deluxe health benefits through the Interim Federal Health Program (IFHP).
Deluxe supplemental health benefits like vision care, home care, and physiotherapy now account for more than half of all IFHP costs.
These are benefits that Canadians who have paid into the system their entire lives canโt access.
Counselling costs have grown from less than 1% of supplementary spending in 2016 to 11% in 2025.
Last year alone, taxpayers paid $38.79 million for counselling and $12.41 million for home visits for asylum seekers under the program.
This damning information comes at a time when six million Canadians canโt access the basic service of a family doctor.
The PBO also revealed the average length of IFHP coverage for asylum claimants is now a staggering four years.
It is undeniable that as the backlog grows, rejected asylum claimants continue adding pressure to a health care system where Canadians are already facing long wait times for care.
The Liberals must explain to Canadians why asylum seekers whose refugee claims were rejected, face enforceable removal orders, and in some cases fail to appear for removal, continue to receive deluxe, taxpayer-funded health benefits while they avoid leaving Canada.