Poppy

Free spirit ....

[Dr. Maalouf ‏ @realMaalouf]

Why does nobody care?

In Africa, Arab Muslims are enslaving black African Christians.

The media, progressives, Palestinian protesters, the UN, and even the Pope remain silent.

[Orla Minihane @orlaminihane]

Just to annoy @SkyNews a little bit more… YES.. another protest. But this time in Glasgow - the RAPE capital of the UK. FAR RIGHT Mothers and Grandmothers will be out in FULL FORCE.. and we aren’t stopping anytime soon !! 🇬🇧 no matter how much you demonise us ! @pinkladies_uk

[Jonathan Slater @slater57649]

Some cats …,

[Timmay @Timmay1Timmay]

@thetimes Man fakes ADHD symptoms to get diagnosis, finds the drugs make his normal brain feel weird. No shit.

Brilliant journalism this.

[The Times and Sunday Times @thetimes]

As part of an investigation, Dr Max Pemberton visited a private clinic and was prescribed drugs he says turned him into a zombie

[Mel Gibson @MelGibson_1th]

This is the most detailed MRI scan of an unborn baby.

At just 20 weeks, she is moving, turning her head, kicking, even standing. Her beating heart is also visible.

Human life is a miracle. 😊❤️🙏

[Valerie Anne Smith @ValerieAnne1970]

Genetically Modified Mayo: Hellmann's 'Real' Mayonnaise now requires a bioengineered label on its jars.

Less than 2% of each jar is egg... 98% is chemicals, oils, corn starch, EDTA & thickened with gums.

This isn’t food anymore — it’s a Frankenstein experiment in a jar. GMO corn, seed oils that inflame your arteries and disrupt hormones, EDTA that leaches minerals from your body, and synthetic gums that wreck your gut lining. Every spoonful is quietly feeding chronic disease, autoimmune chaos, and the slow poisoning of America’s families.

They slapped a “bioengineered” warning on it like it’s no big deal — because they know most people won’t read it. Hellmann’s sold its soul for profit while we were busy trusting the brand our grandparents used.

STOP FEEDING THIS TO YOUR KIDS.
Boycott it. Throw it out. Make your own in 60 seconds with real ingredients. Your body will thank you.

Quick Homemade Butter Mayo (Immersion Blender – makes about 1 cup)
Ingredients:
- 1 large egg (room temperature)
- 2 teaspoons fresh lemon juice
- 2 teaspoons Dijon mustard (or prepared mustard)
- ¼ teaspoon salt (or to taste; use ½ tsp if butter is unsalted)
- 1 cup (2 sticks) butter, melted and cooled slightly to warm (not hot)

Directions:
1. Place the egg, lemon juice, mustard, and salt in a tall narrow jar or container that just fits your immersion blender head.
2. Insert the immersion blender to the bottom and blend for a few seconds until combined.
3. With the blender running, slowly pour in the melted butter. Move the blender up and down gently as it thickens into creamy mayo (about 30-60 seconds total).
4. Taste and adjust salt or lemon if needed.

Store in a glass jar in the refrigerator for up to 1 week.

[Mark Heath 🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🙏🏻 @MarkHeath45]

We are removing all immigrants out of hotels…….

Yes, and converting barracks, and now schools to put them in.

Do they honestly believe we don’t know what they are up to?

This is Market Harborough, not far from me 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻

[Lauren The Insider @insiderlauren]

ROYAL WARNING: DEFEND OR GO!

King Charles Issued Public Warning by Restore Britain's security chief @_HenryBolton

Who do YOU think is Britain first - King Charles or Restore Britain? Let me know in the comments!

[GB News @GBNEWS]

'Which rape of a woman or child is one rape too many?'

Former London police officer Norman Brennan questions if families of murder and rape victims by illegal migrants should 'group together' and take legal action against the Government to 'to insist our streets are safe'.

[The Free Speech Union @SpeechUnion]

If you need any more evidence that an Islamic blasphemy law has taken root in Britain, look no further than the case of Stephen Gray. It is truly one of the most extraordinary cases the FSU has ever come across.

A former police officer who gave 30 years of public service had a knock at the door from the police after his neighbour reported him for reposting something on Facebook.
In April, Stephen was convicted of being “grossly offensive” — an offence under the Communications Act 2003 — for reposting a joke about Islam.

The post featured an image of a rasher of bacon and a man in a turban, accompanied by the text: “Fun facts about bacon! People who eat bacon have a lower chance of marrying a 9 year old!”

While giving evidence, Stephen explained that the post was a reference to the marriage between the Prophet Mohammed and Aisha, which occurred when she was six and was consummated when she was nine. It was a satirical post, but also sought to make a serious point about child marriage.

But the district judge wasn’t having any of it. Stephen was ordered to pay £1,100 in fines, plus legal costs, and now has a criminal conviction.

The Free Speech Union is supporting Stephen in appealing his conviction.
If you are still in any doubt that Britain’s blasphemy laws have returned, 18 years after Parliament voted to abolish them — for Islam alone — take a look at Stephen’s case.

Watch FSU External Affairs Officer @_ConnieShaw explain and donate to the fundraiser 👇

[Rupert Lowe MP @RupertLowe10]

Our Restore Britain investigation has uncovered that the British taxpayer is funding condoms and lubricant for illegal migrants detained in immigration removal centres.

This is not a joke.

A Restore Britain Government will end the piss-take.

[Bishop Ceirion H. Dewar FSHC @BishopDewar]

Rowan Williams condemning the supposed appropriation of Christianity by the “far right” would carry rather more weight had he actually bothered to speak to the people he is condemning.

Have you met them, Lord Williams?

Have you sat with the working-class men carrying crosses through British streets? Have you spoken to those returning to church, rediscovering the Bible, praying the Lord’s Prayer, or asking for the first time in their lives who Jesus Christ actually is?

Or is it simply easier to diagnose them from the comfortable heights of the ecclesiastical establishment?

There is a breathtaking irony here.

Rowan Williams was Archbishop of Canterbury from 2002–2012. During that decade the Church of England continued its decline, the Anglican Communion was convulsed by bitter disputes over doctrine, sexuality and authority, and Williams later acknowledged that Britain had become a “post-Christian” nation.

So perhaps a little humility is appropriate before chastising those now attempting, however imperfectly, to recover the Christianity Britain lost.

Because some of us are entitled to ask:

Who was Archbishop while we were losing it?

Yes, Christianity must never become racial nationalism. The Cross must never become an excuse for hatred. Christ belongs to no political party.

But when thousands of people who haven’t darkened a church door for years begin carrying crosses, singing hymns and talking publicly about Christianity, a missionary Church should not sneer at them.

It should GO TO THEM.

Their theology is poor? Teach them.

Their Christianity is immature? Disciple them.

They carry anger or prejudice? Preach repentance to them.

They misunderstand Christ? Introduce them to Him.

That is what pastors do.

Perhaps if the Church of England had spent rather more of the last generation preaching Jesus Christ with confidence, ordinary Britons would not now be rediscovering Christianity through political movements rather than their parish churches.

Britain is spiritually starving.

And those who presided over decades of Christian retreat from British public life should exercise considerable caution before condemning the people now stumbling through the ruins looking for the Cross.

Before you condemn them, Lord Williams, meet them.

Before questioning their motives, listen to them.

You may discover something rather more uncomfortable than an army of extremists:

A spiritually hungry people searching for something the institutional Church failed to give them.

https://t.co/HzwrnpeOmV

[Cllr Matt Smith - Reform UK - Park & Arbourthorne @MattJSmith]

As soon as I left Sheffield Station, a large group started shouting “are you Reform?” and then cheered…just because of my turquoise tie!

Saving this city, and this country, is a big job, but it’s always great to be reminded of how many people out there are desperate for it and are willing us on.

Britain needs Reform! 🩵🇬🇧

@reformparty_uk @ReformDaily_ #BritainNeedsReform #Sheffield

[Oli London @OliLondonTV]

This is ‘award winning artist’ Jessica Cook showing off her latest art exhibit.

[Sharron Davies HoL MBE @sharrond62]

We’ve lost are blooming marbles, people are sat watching that 🤣

[Orla Minihane @orlaminihane]

A years worth of sexual assaults in 14 days !!!! If Andy Burnham brings these rapists to the UK as suggested… I dread to think.. @pinkladies_uk

[Grok @grok]

Reputable UK firms for such public law/JR claims include Duncan Lewis and Bindmans LLP (solicitors) plus Doughty Street Chambers (barristers).

Court fees are low (£150-900). Legal costs typically £5k-30k+ for standard cases, far higher for complex systemic ones. Adverse costs risk is substantial; a Costs Capping Order under CJCA 2015 may limit liability in genuine public-interest proceedings. Crowdfunding or a legal fund is common.

Process: send Pre-Action Protocol letter, then issue JR promptly (within 3 months) under CPR Part 54 and common-law grounds (illegality, irrationality, unfairness) or HRA 1998 (Arts 2/3 operational/systems duties where real/immediate risk to an identifiable person is known). Most immigration JRs go to the Upper Tribunal (IAC); challenges to legislation, national security or pure policy often to the Administrative Court (High Court). Civil negligence claims face high hurdles on duty and causation. Independent advice on merits is essential.

[tag 🇬🇧 @tag4UK]

@AllenOvery
@Clifford_Chance
@Freshfields
@slaughterandmay
@DLA_Piper
@HoganLovells
@hsfkramer
@NLawGlobal
@gardencourtlaw
@DoughtyStreet
@MatrixChambers
@TheLawSociety
@sra_solicitors
@thebarcouncil
@lawsocgazette
@AllenOveryGrads
@LinklatersGrads
@GardenCtPublic
@DoughtyStreet
@MatrixChambers
@BlackstoneChbrs
@Landmark_LC
@cornerstonebarr
@3PBChambers
@BindmansLLP
@LeighDay_Law
@dpg_law
@BhattMurphy
@thebarcouncil
@TheLawSociety
@LSHumanRights

[tag 🇬🇧 @tag4UK]

Operation Britishlion

Members of the Legal Profession,

We are seeking legal professionals willing to examine whether the British Government and its agencies can be held accountable for failures connected with border security, immigration enforcement and public protection.

A number of serious crimes have reportedly been committed by individuals who entered the United Kingdom through irregular or unlawful routes. Responsibility for those crimes rests first and foremost with the offenders. However, legitimate questions remain about whether public authorities identified foreseeable risks, followed proper safeguarding procedures and took reasonable actions to protect the British public.

The potential consequences extend beyond ordinary immigration enforcement. In May 2025, the Government confirmed that three Iranian nationals, who had arrived in the UK illegally, were charged under the National Security Act with conduct allegedly assisting a foreign intelligence service.

The National Crime Agency has also arrested people in Britain who were wanted abroad for serious offences, including an Egyptian national wanted for murder in France, while reports have described suspects in a separate French murder investigation as potentially having crossed to Britain by small boat.

These cases do not establish the guilt of everyone arriving irregularly, but they demonstrate the serious national security and criminal risks created when identities and backgrounds cannot be reliably established before entry.

The Home Office has also published guidance for people ‘seeking asylum’ covering gender equality, consent, domestic abuse, sexual assault and offences against children. The existence of this guidance does not establish collective guilt or prove that every recipient presents a danger. It does, however, raise questions about the evidence and risk assessments informing government policy, and whether education through a booklet is being supported by adequate screening, monitoring and safeguarding.

We are therefore seeking assistance from solicitors and barristers specialising in public law, human rights, immigration, negligence and government accountability.

In particular, we would welcome advice on:

-Whether any identifiable government decision or failure could be challenged through judicial review.
-Whether the state’s duties under the Human Rights Act may arise where authorities knew of a real and immediate risk to an identifiable person.
-Whether individual victims might have a civil claim arising from a specific and foreseeable institutional failure.
-How relevant risk assessments, safeguarding records and official data can lawfully be obtained.
-What evidence would be required to establish causation, standing and an appropriate remedy.
-Whether a suitable test case could be brought in the public interest.

This initiative is not intended to accuse every asylum seeker or migrant of criminality. Our concern is whether the Government is failing in their fundamental duty to protect everyone living in Britain.

We recognise that political dissatisfaction alone does not create a legal claim. Any proceedings must be founded on evidence, an identifiable legal duty and reasonable prospects of success. For that reason, we are asking the legal profession to examine the facts independently and tell us honestly whether an arguable case exists.

We would be grateful to hear from any firm, solicitor or barrister able to provide an initial consultation, preliminary written opinion, reduced-fee assistance or pro bono support. We would also welcome guidance on establishing a transparent legal fund to cover research, court fees, representation and potential adverse costs.

Victims deserve answers. The public deserves transparency. Government agencies entrusted with border security and public protection must be prepared to account for their decisions where credible evidence suggests that preventable failures have caused serious harm.

If you believe the law may provide a route to obtaining those answers, we respectfully ask for your help.

My PM’s are open if you prefer to message me directly.