F.R.A

Servant of King Jesus | Husband | Father⁴ | Abolitionist | RPCNA

[F.R.A @PostMilstone]

There is not a square inch in the whole domain of our human existence over which Christ, who is Sovereign over all, does not cry, Mine!

Abraham Kuyper

[Joshua Wilborn 🌳 🪓 @EndureInFaith]

Pastor Kevan Myers and his wife Deana have stood at the abortion mills and preached in the culture for years. Kevan pastors Grace Christian Bible Fellowship in Kansas City, KS, and serves on the boards of Abortion is Murder Kansas and Abolish Abortion Missouri. Their family has hit hard times after losing work and Kevan's car. Please pray and consider giving: https://t.co/CyS3ahlm9T

[F.R.A @PostMilstone]

@zachmcd24 Praise be to God! Congrats brother!

[F.R.A @PostMilstone]

Amen!

[Zach McDonough, Esq. @zachmcd24]

Today I got sworn in as an attorney! Now I can work to make sure abortion is abolished and criminalized!

[F.R.A @PostMilstone]

Fantastic analysis, people are starting to notice how bankrupt the pro-life movement is.

[Kaitlin Gaff @kaitlin_gaff]

Logical inconsistencies or outright errors I found in the debate between @JojoRRuba/@StudentsforLife and @bradleypierce/@AbolitionistFAA:

1. At the beginning of the debate, the moderator says, “The debate question is: What is the best way to pursue equal protection for the pre-born?” Both parties agreed on the definition of equal protection as “the same laws that protect the lives of born children should protect the lives of preborn children.”

Jojo states that this debate is not really about the outcome (pre-born children receiving equal protection) or about “jailing women,” as he repeatedly characterizes equal protection. It seems strange to use a derogatory slogan for something you say you support. In the end, he says that what Bradley has to offer is “not Christian,” even though they apparently have the same end goal. Jojo primarily uses emotionally charged hypotheticals in an attempt to discredit Bradley rather than address the debate question.

2. Jojo repeatedly claims that abolitionists have no strategy for achieving equal protection.

False. The strategy is equal protection bills, which pro-life organizations consistently and actively fight against using their political leverage.
Jojo and Students for Life offer no strategy for achieving equal protection other than hoping the culture gets on board at some arbitrary point in the future.

3. Jojo says that partiality means preferring one person over another, referencing James 2. He claims that abolitionists misinterpret the Bible because they say that withholding justice from pre-born babies shows partiality toward women.

There are at least six key scriptures in the Old Testament that command impartiality in judgment, specifically referring to legal cases:
Leviticus 19:15; Deuteronomy 1:17; Deuteronomy 16:19; Exodus 23:3; Psalm 82:2; Malachi 2:9.

4. Jojo says this is “not even about what God wants” and claims that God gives us wisdom—as if that wisdom could differ from the instructions He gives us.

1 Corinthians 3:19 says that the wisdom of man is foolishness to God. If your “wisdom” disagrees with God, it is foolishness.

5. Jojo claims that Bradley made a false connection when he argued that pro-life laws have failed to protect babies in the U.S. because abortion numbers have continued to rise post-Dobbs.

Jojo says this is a false claim because these laws target surgical abortions.
First of all, I thought the goal was to save lives, not just target one method of taking them.
Second, why, then, are pro-life leaders around the country claiming to be saving thousands of pre-born babies through pro-life laws while refusing to address the increasing number of abortions, even in states with partial or total bans?

It is clear that, in order to defend the current pro-life position—which its advocates have tried to rebrand as “permanent abolition” to avoid opposing something as common sense as equal protection—you have to twist yourself into an illogical pretzel.

[F.R.A @PostMilstone]

@kaitlin_gaff @JojoRRuba @StudentsforLife @bradleypierce @AbolitionistFAA

[F.R.A @PostMilstone]

Every child deserves to live.

[F.R.A @PostMilstone]

@EndureInFaith Not sure if we can consider an exemption a right. Calling it a second right turns the absence of a duty into a positive entitlement. Does law does owe women a “right not to be drafted?”

[F.R.A @PostMilstone]

Women have 1 more right than men.

[F.R.A @PostMilstone]

@nathanweisser Nice!

[F.R.A @PostMilstone]

Women have 1 more right than men… They can murder the child in their womb.

[Abolitionists Rising 🌳🪓 @AbolitionRising]

Special Rights

[F.R.A @PostMilstone]

Gender and race don’t matter. So… black Nazi?

[F.R.A @PostMilstone]

@bannedby Liquor

[F.R.A @PostMilstone]

That’s automatically murder?

[F.R.A @PostMilstone]

@nathanweisser I think around 9 or so minutes.

[F.R.A @PostMilstone]

This is very misleading and puts you in a position of bearing false witness. Self-managed abortions have increased and will continue to increase because of pro-life laws.

Conservative numbers from 2025 are around 3,800, a 37.5% increase from the previous year. These are only reported abortions, so the actual numbers are likely higher.

[F.R.A @PostMilstone]

Well said @bradleypierce

[Bradley Pierce @bradleypierce]

I haven't stopped thinking about this video since I saw it. It's one of the most ridiculous misapplications of Scripture I have ever heard.

If you still trust Scott Klusendorf's judgment on how to end abortion, this should give you serious pause. 🧵

[F.R.A @PostMilstone]

All embryos are the same 🤣

[Abolitionists Rising 🌳🪓 @AbolitionRising]

Predicting their responses...

[F.R.A @PostMilstone]

Logic is hard for some people.

[Abolitionists Rising 🌳🪓 @AbolitionRising]

You proved his point

[F.R.A @PostMilstone]

@Jeremiah_hicks Brother, A3 does not ban child sacrifice in Missouri. It won't save a single life if a mother want to kill the child.