First time in my bloodline seeing the PM of a failed state tweeting about a match, that's just a normal game in a series, with the final not even played yet 😆
That's why Pakistan ranks higher than India on the Happiness Index, inki ye chhoti-chhoti khushiyan 😂
Muslims today believe in fiction created by the Abbasid Caliphate.
1. Mecca didn’t exist in the 7th century
A. No archaeological evidence.
B. No historical evidence.
C. No or very little water.
2. Mecca (only mentioned once in the Quran) wasn’t on any historical map until 900.
The Quran talks about a fertile place, which is not Mecca,
A. A stream
B. Fruits
C. Olive trees
D. Fields etc.
None of these were in Mecca in the 7th, 8th, 9th, or 10th centuries, and it was not until the late 20th century that Saudi Arabia started to build water desalination plants.
3. Medina was an insignificant little place.
4. The term ‘Mohammad’ (Praised One) was first found on a Christian coin in 661, referring to Jesus, which had Christian symbols.
5. The term Mohammad was used by Arab Christians for Jesus until the mid-8th century.
6. The Mohammad that Muslims believe in today was invented by the Abbasid Caliphate in the late 8th or early 9th century.
Mohammad is mentioned only four times in the Quran.
The Muslim/Abbasid Mohammad in the Quran is the last of the four (Surah 33:40), an Abbasid interpolation; the first three refer to Jesus.
7. The Dome of the Rock was not a Mosque; it was built by Abdul al-Malik as an anti-trinitarian Christian building.
Both Abdul al-Malik and his brother were anti-trinitarian Christians and used Christian symbols on their coins.
8. Abdul al-Malik sent a directive throughout his Kingdom saying that the term ‘Mohammad’ should refer to Jesus.
9. The only original parts of the Dome of the Rock are the inner ambulatories, and the Mohammad’s written on them refer to Jesus (in fact, the term Jesus is on one of them), and they are decorated with lots of grapes, a Christian symbol.
10. There were no Islamic Qurans in the 7th Century.
The proto-Quran was Christian lectionaries written in Aramaic and old Arabic.
This has led to many mistranslations in the much later Islamic/Abbasid Quran.
Conclusion: What Muslims believe today is a fraudulent story started by the Abbasid Caliphate when they came into power in 750.
The Abbasid Caliphate bastardized the Arab Anti-trinitarian Christian lectionaries (combined with the mistranslations) to form their Quran to suit their agenda.
Islam did not create an empire. The empire created Islam.
Ravana was born half Brahmin. And he became a Brahmin after learning all the vedas and getting mastery of all the shastras.
And btw, Sri Lankans (the majority Sinhalese) are related to people from north India and speak an Aryan language. Many of them may be related to people of Kalinga who migrated during Asoka's devastating war on the kingdom.
I see you are a "medieval" historian. Please learn and understand India's rich history and culture more, beyond only medieval Mughals, before creating seemingly casteist narratives to divide Indians.
No point copying British colonizers who falsely claimed some superior European "Aryan invasion" over great native people of ancient India to justify their imperialism.
Yesterday, I was reading about Alauddin Khilji. According to the account I came across, he suffered a painful death. He died from fluid accumulation in his abdomen, and for the last two years of his life, he had reportedly suffered from leprosy, with parts of his body beginning to rot.
Of course, such diseases can affect even the most decent and civilized people. But when something like this happens to a tyrant, a barbarian, or a cruel ruler, it strengthens the belief that people must face the consequences of their misdeeds in this very life. This is how it should be. This is how it ought to be.
And Khilji was not the only one. The deaths of almost every tyrannical ruler of the medieval period were deeply painful, according to this view of history. Among the Mughals, it almost became a tradition for emperors to spend their final years watching their own sons fight and kill one another for the throne.
Akbar, Jahangir, Shah Jahan, Aurangzeb — all of them, in their old age, suffered the agony of witnessing conflicts involving their own children.
Akbar was already devastated by the deaths of his two sons, Murad and Daniyal, amid the turmoil of the royal family. He pleaded with Jahangir, but Jahangir continued to have people close to Akbar killed. Many of Akbar's associates, including Abul Fazl, were killed, while the aging emperor was left helpless and distressed. He eventually died, burdened by these tragedies. Jahangir, too, faced similar troubles.
The world remembers Shah Jahan as a great lover because of the Taj Mahal, but he was no less ruthless than other Mughal rulers. When it came to the treatment of Hindus, he was even more hard-line than many of his predecessors.
His end was even more tragic. The severed head of his beloved son, Dara Shikoh, was reportedly displayed on the tip of a dagger and paraded through Agra. Eventually, the head was presented on a platter before Shah Jahan, who was being held prisoner.
And all of this was done by his own son.
Having already witnessed the deaths of his other sons at the hands of their brother, one can only imagine the agony Shah Jahan must have endured in captivity as he approached the end of his life.
And this did not happen to these rulers alone. The final years of many tyrannical rulers were marked by suffering, betrayal, and tragedy. Most importantly, none of them could peacefully pass power on to the next generation. They were all eventually pushed out of power.
I believe that the deaths of emperors and kings should be taught in history books as well. People should know that, sooner or later, everyone must answer for their actions in this very life.
For building a civilized society, it is essential that people remember the tragic endings of those who ruled with cruelty and barbarism.
Ranveer Singh is a great actor. Possibly the best in his generation. But I don't know what he sees in his controlling wife who emasculates him at every opportunity. She is an alpha widow. Got Ranbir Kapoor's tattoo and never gave him attitude. Got dumped, and now she thinks she has 'settled' for Ranveer and is above him. First that Koffee with Karan segment where she spoke of seeing other people while simultaneously seeing Ranveer(she would never do that with Ranbir). She also never congratulated him on the Dhurandhar franchise publicly. Now kids got D names like their mother with her surname hyphenated with his. He is far more successful than her, in fact he is peaking. She has delusions of grandeur. She has no box office clout. Padmaavat worked because of Ranveer and the historical theme, not her. A Man that successful usually got a supporting wife. Here the wife has main character syndrome.
Green Flag is feminist euphemism for Cvck. I hope Ranveer does not become one.
Mahua, just eight months ago, you sent 13 policemen from Krishnanagar to arrest & intimidate me for quoting a tweet about u. Instructed them to create a nuisance in my neighbourhood to sully my image.
You slapped 12 non-bailable FIRs on me, which were quashed by the High Court
In France mobs are desecrating Churches. Christians are quiet.
In Saudi a couple was beheaded for kissing in Mosque. Rationalists are quiet.
In Albania Supreme Court was burned. Constitutionalists are quiet.
In Afghanistan Taliban said women's education is forever banned. Feminists are quiet.
In Kashmir doctors said choose Burqa over degree. Secularists are quiet.
When it comes to Islam everyone is quiet 🤔
Islam has colonized 57 countries, massacared, genocided, committed jihad against 57 nations to conquer them so far, has relegated women to a second class status in its gender apartheid ideology for 1400 years, systematically treating us as half humans, has enslaved up to 18 million Africans and 4 million non-Americans, legalized child marriage for 1400 years as a result of which millions of little girls as young as 6 are in legal marriages to the men who own them, legalized dhimmitude to force non-Muslims to live under a second class status as well, has been colonizing the west for the past half century or so quiet violently and vehemently, but how dare we call it out as a problem, right? Let’s blame the whitey because his white guilt will do the rest of the work for you, right? Maybe they’ll even give you a nuclear bomb so you can do the one thing you haven’t done yet because you don’t have the brain cells to have the technology, right? Right!
In 2026, America targeted 4 countries with tariffs:
Chile 🇨🇱 Spain 🇪🇸 France 🇫🇷 India 🇮🇳
All four opposed the tariffs and tried to reduce their dependence on US.
Just months later, all 4 started facing protests against Govt & in all four, students are the main target of protests.
Coincidence? You decide.
Shocking demands from a Bangladeshi man at Dhruv Rathee’s London protest:🤯
Q: Why did you come to an Indian protest when you’re from Bangladesh?
Man: Yes, I’m from Bangladesh, but I’ve been living in West Bengal for the past few years. However, I was deported because of the SIR conducted under Gyanesh Kumar.
Q: So, what are your demands, and do you support CJP?
Man: I support CJP, and I want regime change in India so I can return to West Bengal, where I lived under Mamata Didi’s government.🥲
Thanks, Dhruv Rathee, for this London protest. Now I know why I should vote for the BJP and support Gyanesh Kumar.🙏
“𝐑𝐞𝐠𝐢𝐦𝐞 𝐂𝐡𝐚𝐧𝐠𝐞,” 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐲 𝐬𝐚𝐲.
Their mask is off. The sinister agenda is now out in the open. Unable to win the trust of 140 crore Indians during elections, the INDI Alliance and its radical cabal are openly challenging the very foundations of the Indian Republic.
Their own words expose their intent.
Rahul Gandhi brazenly declares, “Our fight is against the Indian State itself.” Not against a political party. Not against a government policy. But against the Indian State itself and its constitutional machinery.
Prashant Bhushan openly calls for “regime change” and has spoken of revolution involving bloodshed, guns and the Army. This is not the language of democratic dissent or a peaceful transfer of power through elections. It raises a fundamental question: when they speak of regime change, are they talking about defeating a government at the ballot box or bringing the State to its knees through street violence?
Then comes Neha Bora, glorifying foreign turmoil with the slogan, “Lal Salaam to Bangladesh for showing the way.” This is an open romanticisation of the upheaval, violence and mob lynchings associated with Bangladesh’s political crisis, while holding up events beyond the constitutional process as a model to follow.
𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐩𝐚𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐧 𝐢𝐬 𝐮𝐧𝐦𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐤𝐚𝐛𝐥𝐞: 𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐞𝐧𝐠𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐒𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐞, 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐯𝐨𝐤𝐞 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐟𝐫𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐥𝐚𝐰 𝐞𝐧𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐜𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭, 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐧 𝐜𝐫𝐲 “𝐨𝐩𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧” 𝐰𝐡𝐞𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐩𝐨𝐥𝐢𝐜𝐞 𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐦 𝐭𝐡𝐞𝐢𝐫 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐭𝐮𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐝𝐮𝐭𝐲 𝐭𝐨 𝐦𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐚𝐢𝐧 𝐥𝐚𝐰 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐞𝐫. 𝐅𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐞𝐞𝐭 𝐯𝐞𝐭𝐨𝐞𝐬 𝐭𝐨 𝐫𝐡𝐞𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐜 𝐚𝐛𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝐛𝐥𝐨𝐨𝐝𝐬𝐡𝐞𝐝, 𝐭𝐡𝐢𝐬 𝐩𝐨𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐬 𝐫𝐢𝐬𝐤𝐬 𝐩𝐮𝐬𝐡𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐚 𝐫𝐢𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐠, 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐟𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐁𝐡𝐚𝐫𝐚𝐭 𝐭𝐨𝐰𝐚𝐫𝐝𝐬 𝐢𝐧𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐛𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐭𝐲 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐨𝐬.
But India is not Bangladesh. It is not Nepal.
India is a strong, resilient Republic, anchored in its Constitution, democratic institutions and the will of its people. And beyond law enforcement stands the greatest safeguard of all: crores of law-abiding Indians who will not allow the sanctity of our Republic, our Tricolour or our sovereignty to be undermined.
No political ambition is greater than the nation. No street mobilisation can substitute for the people’s mandate. And no call for upheaval can override the Constitution. Every attempt to undermine democratic institutions must be confronted through the rule of law, constitutional safeguards and the unwavering resolve of the Indian people.
𝐋𝐨𝐧𝐠 𝐋𝐢𝐯𝐞 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐈𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐑𝐞𝐩𝐮𝐛𝐥𝐢𝐜. 🇮🇳
Jai Hind!
Dhruv Rathee is back in Germany. Do you know why he left so suddenly?
In 2018, he made a video claiming that a private social media user, Vikas Pandey, had offered a Rs 50 lakh bribe to a man named Mahaveer Prasad Khileri to make him speak against Rathee. The video was then retweeted by Arvind Kejriwal.
Following this, Vikas and his family faced abuse, harassment, and threats from Rathee and AAP supporters. He took legal action against both Kejriwal and Rathee for defamation.
The video was so baseless and unfounded that despite being represented by top lawyers like Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Kejriwal had to admit his mistake and apologize in the Supreme Court.
While proceedings against Kejriwal were dropped following his apology, the criminal defamation case against the video's creator, Dhruv Rathee, continued. The courts kept issuing summonses and notices to Rathee in connection with the ongoing trial, but sitting abroad, he did not bother to respond.
He came to India recently to join the CJP's regime-change protests. Two days ago, Vikas Pandey's legal team tracked him to his residence in Sector 56, Gurugram. After Rathee refused to take phone calls or accept the documents directly, the lawyers pasted the summons outside his Gurugram home with the help of the society's security guards.
Realizing that he could be arrested in this case for repeatedly ignoring summonses over the last eight years, he chickened out and left India in a hurry. So much for his respect for the law and the judicial process!