Most of us agree that too much inequality is bad—but what kind of equality is good? In this week’s @NewYorker, I write about the philosophy of egalitarianism, which is full of puzzles, contradictions, and insights: https://t.co/l8TshJBYO8
Great read. Agree that equality means too many different things to different people. Conceptual clarity helps some, but as I’ve argued in @PracticalEqual, sometimes the better answer is to disaggregate the idea and do the work of equality by other means.
Should judges match a populist president’s escalations with escalations of their own? Contrary to popular opinion, I say no. Certainly not if a robust democracy is the ultimate goal. @BU_Law
“When injustice is left in place and perceived to be irremediable, citizens begin to doubt the power of the law. They start to lose their sense of civic responsibility and faith in a shared future.” https://t.co/5SPMmlYqgY
For our special print issue on the country’s 250th anniversary, we asked about 100 historians and other public intellectuals to make some lists for us that summarize the nation’s high and low points: our best and worst presidents; the images that most sharply define American history; the greatest works of art; and more. The results are fun, fascinating, and give a real and true sense of the sweep of our history.
Now it’s your turn! Take this reader survey and tell us what you think the right answers are—and see where yours stack up compared to our experts and to other readers. 👇
“In establishing the American republic, the Framers unleashed a pair of seductive ideas: popular sovereignty and written constitutionalism. One is treated as a God-given right; the other, a cherished means of ordering society.” @Harvard_Press#America250
Did you know that before John Brown attacked Harper’s Ferry he wrote a Declaration of Independence? Or that he led a convention that approved a provisional constitution? Please join us for a conversation about Brown’s legacy on June 29, 7 pm EST zoom: https://t.co/O36FQfstVV
“As another season of last-minute U.S. Supreme Court opinions are handed down, Americans are faced with a perennial question: how much compliance is obligatory and how much room is there to disagree?” https://t.co/I8iZbVhH4l
It should be clear by now that SCOTUS’s power is no longer merely interpretation but national policymaking in nature, with all of the hopes, dreams, and demands for accountability that that entails.