Pranav Arora

Advocate, Supreme Court Of India | Karmaveer Chakra Award 2017 Instituted By UN and iCongo| Pramerica Spirit Of Community Award 2013

[Pranav Arora @PranavAroraa]

Empires fall when privilege mistakes itself for permanence. From Rome's aristocratic circles to Britain's colonial establishments,history has little patience for institutions that exist to preserve exclusivity.

Republic owes its spaces to the public, not to colonial-era elitism.

[ThePrintIndia @ThePrintIndia]

The future of Delhi Gymkhana Club hangs in the balance after an eviction notice over alleged lease violations and dues. For many members, it’s more than a club—it’s a community and a way of life. Watch ThePrint report by Sakshi Mehra @sakshiiimehra

https://t.co/lgO39SDKdl

[Pranav Arora @PranavAroraa]

Governor cannot act as an "Autocratic Political Ombudsman"

If a Governor uses his discretion to intentionally delay Govt. formation, such action is then subject to judicial review and Constitution of India.

Since, such an act of Governor might lead to abuse of law

@TVKVijayHQ

[Pranav Arora @PranavAroraa]

Constitutional protection of speech under Article 19(1)(a) does not extend to conduct that infringes dignity, safety, or lawful order within a secured civil aviation environment. Rule of law prevails over political aggression in an aircraft cabin.(6/6)

[Pranav Arora @PranavAroraa]

Heckling, intimidation, targeted sloganeering, or organised harassment of any passenger aboard in an aircraft is impermissible in law, irrespective of the political identity of the passenger involved. (1/6)

[Mahua Moitra @MahuaMoitra]

So here is the official complaint @IndiGo6E and @RamMNK @DGCAIndia - please inform me of action taken. Regards. (1/2)

[Pranav Arora @PranavAroraa]

Airlines and aircraft commanders carry a corresponding statutory obligation to maintain order and safety onboard. The Aircraft Act, 1934 and DGCA framework empower intervention where passenger conduct threatens discipline, safety, or orderly operation of the aircraft cabin.(5/6)

[Pranav Arora @PranavAroraa]

@palkisu Congratulations @palkisu

[Pranav Arora @PranavAroraa]

Fact-finding by @AITCofficial on WB post-poll violence is essential to uncover the truth.

“law & order during and after counting” must face scrutiny

Accountability must prevail

The claims cannot override ground realities.

A righteous step!

@MamataOfficial @abhishekaitc

[Pranav Arora @PranavAroraa]

Many congratulations to @TVKVijayHQ , it was a necessary win and you deserved it than anyone else.

[Pranav Arora @PranavAroraa]

Do you mean to say that a person aggrieved by an impugned order should resort to boycotting the judicial process, rather than file an appeal against an unfavourable order?

This ought to have been avoided.

If aggrieved, the proper course is to follow the legal procedure.

[DNA @dna]

#ManishSisodia has written to Justice #SwaranakantaSharma following #ArvindKejriwal, stating that no lawyer will represent him and expressing a lack of faith in the judicial process. He said he sees little hope for justice and hinted at adopting a Satyagraha-style protest, further intensifying the political and legal tensions around the case.

[Pranav Arora @PranavAroraa]

@LeherSethi I agree! I was expecting too much from people sitting on constitutional positions.

[Pranav Arora @PranavAroraa]

It’s surprising!! —since the law clearly says otherwise.

[Arvind Gunasekar @arvindgunasekar]

Rajya Sabha Chairman CP Radhakrishnan approves merger of seven AAP Rajya Sabha members with BJP.

[Pranav Arora @PranavAroraa]

Pending disqualification proceedings should not have been rendered infructuous by first recognising a ‘merger’

Adjudication ought to have preceded such determination.

A hurried recognition defeated the Tenth Schedule’s anti-defection mandate.

@SanjayAzadSln @VPIndia

[SansadTV @sansad_tv]

Rajya Sabha Chairman approves merger of 7 AAP MPs with Bharatiya Janata Party; BJP's tally now rises from 106 to 113.

MPs Raghav Chadha, Ashok Kumar Mittal, Harbhajan Singh, Sandeep Kumar Pathak, Dr. Vikramjit Singh Sahney, Swati Maliwal and Rajinder Gupta, who quit AAP to join BJP on 24th April, are now listed among the 113 Rajya Sabha MPs of BJP.

@VPIndia @raghav_chadha @DrAshokKMittal @Harbhajan_bhaji @SwatiJaiHind @Rajinder_Gupta @BJP4India

[Pranav Arora @PranavAroraa]

ADM Jabalpur 2.0

Don’t forget @sardesairajdeep ,the role of Supreme Court during the Emergency!

[Rajdeep Sardesai @sardesairajdeep]

IMPORTANT: several election duty officers in Bengal don’t find their names on the rolls! What does SC say? Justice Bagchi: , “This election, we understand. More valuable right to remain on the rolls, we will examine.” EXAMINE, your Lordship? By the time you examine, elections will be over! Straight Bat Replug on how EC and SC have let down Indian citizens. Right to vote is NOT a post dated cheque your Lordships! https://t.co/4WhQD4uac7

[Pranav Arora @PranavAroraa]

ADM jabalpur 2.0

[Bar and Bench @barandbench]

#BREAKING Election duty officers move Supreme Court saying they themselves are not on West Bengal #SIR List

Se Adv MR Shamshad: These are 65 petitioners who are on election duty. Their duty orders mention EPIC numbers. Now those numbers are deleted. Now the persons conducting elections cannot vote ! This is on the face arbitrary. Many not given reasons.

CJI: Make these arguments before the appellate tribunal. Let the tribunal look into it

Justice Bagchi: Appropriate orders will be passed by the tribunal .. this election yes perhaps they can't vote. The more valuable right to remain on the rolls shall be preserved.

[Pranav Arora @PranavAroraa]

Political Party is the "superior" body. The Legislature Party is merely its "offspring."

Letter from the "offspring" (the 7 MPs) cannot be used to declare the "parent" (AAP) as merged

Chairman is legally bound to verify if the AAP Executive actually passed a resolution to merge

[NDTV @ndtv]

🔴#BREAKING | RS Chair to approve merger of 7 AAP MPs in BJP, merger to conclude today

NDTV's @AkhileshSharma1 joins @reetksahni with more details

[Pranav Arora @PranavAroraa]

@sanket Paragraph 4(2) cannot exist in a vacuum; it is a qualifier to 4(1), not a substitute for it.
The wording in Paragraph 4(2) is: "the merger... shall be deemed to have taken place if, and only if, not less than two-thirds... have agreed."

[Pranav Arora @PranavAroraa]

@sanket Even in the Maharashtra judgment (2023), SC made it clear:
Legislators cannot hijack the party and claim legitimacy. The political party outside the House remains central to determining a valid merger.