I set this account up for my son to use tech/social media to get him into the Phenomenon...but alas, it swallowed me๐โโ๏ธ
๐ธ๐ชฑ๐ณ๐๐น๐ฉ๐งช๐๐ค
"Machinery really does exist. It's consciousness driven." ~Robert Bigelow
Is Robert Bigelow a Firsthand Witness to Non-Human "Machinery"?
(Not new but may have slipped under your radar. This is not the clip I was looking for but I watched it again and always wanted to share. )
Robert Bigelow: "You're leaving out, you know, kind of the holy grail of the topic. You know, machinery."
@g_knapp: "Yeah. Is there machinery? The New York Times reported that you modified your facility here in order to house some material from somewhere else."
~From that NYT article on 12/16/2017~
"Under Mr. Bigelowโs direction, the company modified buildings in Las Vegas for the storage of metal and other materials that Mr. Elizondo and program contractors said had been recovered from unidentified aerial phenomena."
(@helenecooper, @ralphblu and @lesliekean received a lot of flack for that paragraph as people took it to mean that Bigelow (BAASS) received those materials/alloys. But that's not what they wrote. They modified buildings IN CASE they received that stuff. And we now know (or, have been told) that one of those "materials" was an alleged non-human craft from @LockheedMartin. Reportedly, they were trying to divest themselves of it due to a lack of success in reverse engineering efforts.)
Link to full article:
https://t.co/sCe9Q4Wso7
~
Knapp: "Did you ever have it?"
Bigelow: "We never had any."
Knapp: "Did you ever see it?"
(I transcribed Mr. B's answer word-for-word because he looked and sounded really uncomfortable answering. I have zero doubt he's telling the truth, but that doesn't mean ANY of this is proof that we have these craft.)
Bigelow: "Umm. Well, I've...there's, I, umm... You know, do you see, do you see, uhh, things that are photos, or do you see things in person, and so forth? So, you don't want to, you don't want to talk about stuff in case it happens in the future."
Knapp: "Yeah."
(If Mr. Bigelow was shown government photos or videos (with proper provenance) of craft that were presented to him as being manufactured by non-humans or an intelligence of unknown origin, is that enough to call him a firsthand witness? If he saw "machinery" and saw it "in person," then he's 100% a firsthand witness. Did Lacatski take him to see the craft that was described in "Initial Revelations"? ๐๐ผ๐๐ผ๐๐ผ )
โAt the conclusion of a 2011 meeting in the Capitol building with a U.S. Senator and an agency Under Secretary, Lacatski, the only one of this bookโs authors present, posed a question. He stated that the United States was in possession of a craft of unknown origin and had successfully gained access to its interior. This craft had a streamlined configuration suitable for aerodynamic flight but no intakes, exhaust, wings, or control surfaces. In fact, it appeared not to have an engine, fuel tanks, or fuel. Lacatski asked: What was the purpose of this craft? Was it a life-support craft useful only for atmospheric reentry or what? If it was a spacecraft, then how did it operateโ?
~End Excerpt from Initial Revelations~
~~~
Bigelow: "So, you don't want to, you don't want to talk about stuff in case it happens in the future. And...because who knows what might happen in terms of a coalescing of intersections that could happen? And so..."
Knapp: "You don't wanna spill any beans that causes you, it puts you in a bad light somewhere down the road."
Bigelow: "Well, I just, I, I, you know, of...I think that... Machinery really does exist. It does exist, you know? And so, but the problem has been the inability to back engineer. And I kind of think that some things require a weightless environment. So, part of that is, we don't have it here, terrestrially. So, what you need is a manufacturing facility where there's a weightless environment."
Knapp: "It's part of the reason you developed Bigelow Aerospace."
Bigelow: "For certain amalgams and certain kinds of things, but it's also like, you know, it doesn't do you much good to own a sliver of a case that holds a cell phone to understand, was it even a case? Was it holding something, and what was that something it was holding? And much less, how does a cell phone work? And, oh, by the way, it doesn't work at all if you don't have all the communication capabilities that that cell phone needs to communicate with, and all that kind of thing. So it's like...it could just domino out into a thousand different things. So, having an answer on a small sliver of something isn't necessarily much, right?"
(On thing I've consistently said is: If we're going to wake up the masses, materials won't do it. A rectangular piece of metal from an alleged NHI craft that a scientist says cannot be manufactured on Earth with known technology, is interesting, but not enough. IMO, we need a full (or partial) craft (machinery) and bodies.)
Bigelow: "So, we are embarrassingly - as a specie, as a science, as a space-faring, attempting specie - behind. We're a galactic embarrassment, almost. I mean, we're so far freaking behind, we really are. It's a galactic embarrassment and we may not even be able to, consciously, be able to operate the things, you know? Because it's not like fingerprints or anything, you know? It's consciousness driven. So you taste that a little bit in being able to have some communications."
(If it's truly consciousness driven, then what @jakebarber2025 and @SkywatcherHQ have spoken about makes complete sense: Using telepathy or psi to attract/summon craft and then operate them from a distance.)
Bigelow: "And we have other areas of psi and phenomenology, where mentally, people can have macro PK, you know? They can execute macro-PK events, and they're not supposed to be able to do that. Our physics and science says, 'No, you can't do that.' And yet it's happening, right? So whether it's Bob Jahn's and Brenda Dunne's work in micro PK on subatomic particles, or macro PK with Kulagina in Russia, and with her bell jar and all that kind of thing. And she's lifting a pencil or bottle cap."
Here are a few clips of Kulagina. I'm not sure if she's done this under more strict controls.
https://t.co/0sKimow98a
https://t.co/cTtUaoaZzE
( I love that Bigelow is well read on these subjects and knows they're legit. But I wonder when the masses will realize it?)
~~~
Bigelow: "You're sniffing at something that's really not on our radar as a parochial-educational system in physics or anything. You're totally outside the boundary, right? And we're still dealing with fire engines, right? Okay? So, it's really frustrating and the potential might some day be there to try to back engineer more. And we've heard stories about little bitty things that maybe the Russians have back engineered.
"And so, we're still enough of, potentially, the Klingons to turn things into weapons, right? So that's a big problem. Is the fact that we don't have an intersection. If you have two lines, one on spirituality and technology. Where's the intersection ever happening? Because we're flatlined on spiritual evolution, but our technological evolution is not only vertical, it's segmented, it's jumping. It's jumping faster, you know? And so. where's that intersection of harmony supposed to be? I don't see it. I don't see it 100 years from now, or 200 years from now. I don't see anything on the horizon today that's saying, 'Well, the spirituality line is gonna start to really accelerate [and] this other one (technological) is going to start to stop. And eventually, there's going to be an intersection of harmony where there's an integration of the two. I don't see...I can't possibly foresee that, I don't see it at all. So it's a big worry."
(Steven Greer has said:
"The [ETs] that are here, they'd be like Gandhi. No civilization that is capable of interstellar travel is allowed out of their solar system until they're peaceful. Otherwise, they're quarantined. But actually, we have technology that can go interstellar. We're not allowed to. And the reason is, we're still savages." ~Greer on his IG
(I have no idea if that's true and neither does Greer.)
Bigelow: "If you were an occupying...if you were another specie on another planet, a thinking specie of intelligence, and we had the capabilities to get to you, you should be damn concerned about the human race."
Knapp. "Yeah. If I had that technology, I would not give it to us."
Bigelow: "Yeah! Okay, you just said it. That's exactly right. You just said that. That is the big enchilada, right there. You just said it, that's the plate."
(I want this tech shared with the world if it can help clean up our planet or advance our science and medicine. But if it can be used as a weapon, it's hard to argue with what Mr. B and Knapp said there. This assumes we've been able to reverse engineer certain aspects of the tech we allegedly have in our possession.)
@AlchemyAmerican I've been to this park, quite an uneasy feeling all throughout!! Beautiful area but sense of dread simultaneously ๐ฌ Terry has an amazing story.