Price Action Cowboy (PAC)

Not Financial Advice, Not for those who need a confirmation bias. I tell the story of candle sticks. If that triggers you then talk to your therapist

[Price Action Cowboy (PAC) @PriceActionCB]

I am no one. I do not enjoy trading. It's a lonely mans game and not for the weak hearted/easily triggered. Started this account from scratch on 6/14/24 as a no body hoping to bring back some decency and good charts back into the space.

[Price Action Cowboy (PAC) @PriceActionCB]

They retained ~70% of their missile stockpile and launchers per US intel assessments. Production sites and launch infrastructure took heavy hits, which is why their barrage sizes dropped sharply during the main fighting.

Attacking Kuwait (soft with limited defenses) after months of reconstitution doesn't prove they are at 100%. It proves they still have enough left to poke weak spots with drones/missiles while avoiding stronger opponents. Smart enemies exploit gaps, but it doesn't erase the damage done to their industrial base and inventory.

[Price Action Cowboy (PAC) @PriceActionCB]

No, the inconsistency is in your head. I do not agree with bombing Iran, although it was justified. As stated, I do not listen to Trump. I read between the lines. Hence, Iran stating "no program" and "no plan to recover nuclear debris from under the rubble." Or the Pentagon and the IAEA both confirmed the strikes caused severe damage to the 3 sites. collapsed tunnel entrances, destroyed infrastructure, buried/contaminated material. I do not think Iran is "weeks" away from a nuke. Especially with enrichment at 60% currently. Your issue is that you "need" to be right and will continue digging holes to convince yourself that you are right. Which is fine, keep digging.

[Price Action Cowboy (PAC) @PriceActionCB]

You don’t and shouldn’t listen to any leader when it comes to war. And you don’t have to believe Trump. Iran’s nuclear facilities were hit, hence the debate over how to excavate the buried ‘nuclear dust’ and where it should go. Iran proposed China take custody, the US said no.

Some info (~25% to ~50%) coming from Trump is false, misleading, or over exaggerated. However, (~80% to ~90%) of the info coming out of the IRGC is proven to be completely fabricated. You don’t listen to what they are saying, you listen for what they aren’t directly saying.

[Price Action Cowboy (PAC) @PriceActionCB]

@KhanSaba1278 This is satire. It has to be.

[Price Action Cowboy (PAC) @PriceActionCB]

@Ru68128Me West Taiwan, I mean China is always upset that Taiwan is independent.

[Price Action Cowboy (PAC) @PriceActionCB]

The F-35 is not the U.S. air superiority fighter. The F-35 is a flying electronic warfare command suite, the entire skin of the aircraft is a sensor. Locates surface to air missiles and communicates that with other aircraft to strike.

That is the F-22, which is factually the only 5th gen aircraft in the world has a radar cross section of a bumble bee with the most advanced radar in an aircraft. It has no competition.

[Price Action Cowboy (PAC) @PriceActionCB]

@junshiguancha1 @TheWitness2030 Seen them 1,000 times in real life. Most anyone in the aviation field can spot a Soviet copy. The j-35 uses the W-13 aka the RD-93. You’re showing the The W-10, which still doesn’t use modern crystal turbine blades. W-10 and variants are good but they are old tech. Keep trying

[Price Action Cowboy (PAC) @PriceActionCB]

This is why you have little to no critical thought or knowledge of these things. The Ratio, size, is not the comparison. It’s the aerodynamic measurement that was copied. Again, not an opinion it’s fact. Boeing even came out and said it. The U.S. was pissed until we learned that China put the RD-93 in it lhahaha. You called it a 6th gen, and claim isn’t radar cross section is the size of palm. And we are supposed to believe it after you all place 2 RD-93 in it with thousands of grain boundaries in the metalwork on the blades lol, you all don’t even know what crystal blades are in a jet engine. You can’t comprehend that our engine blades have ZERO Grain boundaries. It’s the reason for the black smoke during the live show. It’s not stealth

Sit down you’re making yourself look like an idiot.

[Price Action Cowboy (PAC) @PriceActionCB]

Look at the Shenyang J-35. Resemble anything? Oh yeah that’s right it’s the F-35. Again copying 25 year old tech. Want proof?

Nose: copied to the millimeter
DSI INLET: match 99.3%
twin canted tail angles: matched.
Identical fuselage dimensions, weapon bays, and panel seams.

However, China couldn’t steal the engine specs, and China has ZERO experience in the propulsion. So, they outsourced the engine, and got the RD-93 which is a Soviet design from the 1980s lol. It smoked during the “world premier.” And you call it a 6th gen. Sit down

[Price Action Cowboy (PAC) @PriceActionCB]

Look at the Shenyang J-35. Resemble anything? Oh yeah that’s right it’s the F-35. Again copying 25 year old tech. Want proof?

Nose: copied to the millimeter
DSI INLET: match 99.3%
twin canted tail angles: matched.
Identical fuselage dimensions, weapon bays, and panel seams.

However, China couldn’t steal the engine specs, and China has ZERO experience in the propulsion. So, they outsourced the engine, and got the RD-93 which is a Soviet design from the 1980s lol. It smoked during the “world premier.” And you call it a 6th gen.

It’s not me saying this, it was broadcast on live TV.

[Price Action Cowboy (PAC) @PriceActionCB]

Big difference between manufacturing and innovation. Ever heard the US stealing China tech? No, it’s always China stealing US tech. Because China has no innovation. Their ships, fighter jets, 80% of munitions are 20 year old tech from the US. Look at the specs. They do have more hypersonic missiles. But their accuracy is suspect. Their stealth jets, are not so stealthy at 0.005 (RCH) of which our f-16s can detect and their for when in a dog fight against inferior pilots.

[Price Action Cowboy (PAC) @PriceActionCB]

Hahahah, “They ‘AIM’ for transistor density equivalent to ~1.4nm by 2031.” lol
“Major breakthrough,”

“physical limits broken,” “blockade smashed,” “future defined by China.” It’s all classic CCP-adjacent framing to boost nationalism and downplay reliance on foreign tech. It’s not a new fundamental law of physics, it’s clever engineering workarounds under sanctions. And again, you’re bragging about something the US already announced 4 years ago and already generated. A14 is old, A12 and A10 are the new standard.

[Price Action Cowboy (PAC) @PriceActionCB]

The US is not copying China. We don’t need to. Look at your AI infrastructure, it’s made up of massive clusters (quantity) in comparison to US. Why? Because your chips are 20 year old reversed engineered. They take up 30% more power. It’s not a bad thing, you’re just behind.
The US has been free thinking since 1776. West Taiwan’s, I mean China’s government still won’t allow critical thinking, you get punished for it. Until that changes you will always be chasing the US. That’s not an opinion, it’s facts. With REAL life inventions and applications in every tech sector.

[Price Action Cowboy (PAC) @PriceActionCB]

China leads in raw R&D spending and paper volume lately. Awesome, massive investment pays off in QUANTITY.

But QUALITY, impact, and real innovation is another story.
U.S. dominates high-impact/cited research in key fields and breakthroughs (Nobel prizes, foundational tech like AI models and advanced semis).
ASPI dog shit, yes China leads high-impact research paper OUTPUT. Not DEPLOYMENT dominance. China still imports tech, and relies on stolen intellectual property, and lags in commercialization most notably EUV lithography.

Quantity is not superiority. Massive state subsidies and systematic theft artificially inflate China’s numbers.

Real leadership is inventing what others copy, not copying what others invent.

U.S. openness + private innovation built the modern world. China’s model free-rides on it. That’s the gap

[Price Action Cowboy (PAC) @PriceActionCB]

The U.S. leads global innovation because it’s open and creates world class tech worth stealing , hence is why West Taiwan, I mean China stole the F-35 designs, advanced semis, AI Algorithms, and 30 year old stealth tech.

Open societies trade some security for freedom and creativity. America responds with prosecutions, export controls, and CFIUS blocks.

China steals high value intellectual property because they’re lazy, they don’t have the mental bandwidth for innovation, you just want shortcuts, China is a parasite latched on to American innovation, look up “Made in China 2025.” Or maybe you can’t cuz your government controls what you can look at. Kind of like a child.

So, Deflect all you want, cope how you can, lie to yourself all you want. But the facts do care about your propaganda.

[Price Action Cowboy (PAC) @PriceActionCB]

Many students study abroad, that’s normal.
What’s not normal…
CCP policy of cyber espionage, forced joint ventures tech handovers, Thousand Talents IP diversion, and hacking that costs the U.S. $600B/year. 80% of FBI economic espionage prosecutions are from China.

Other countries send students too.
Only China runs a systematic acquisition machine backed by the state. That’s theft, not tuition.

Defend the full picture or stop deflecting.

[Price Action Cowboy (PAC) @PriceActionCB]

@LUVIERN_UCF @KaziuLitwin @SundaeDivine You been to or from Poland?

Poland is the definition of Christian Nationalism. With Strong boarders, ZERO importation of 3rd world immigrants, heavily armed, and zero tolerance for criminals or illegal immigration.

[Price Action Cowboy (PAC) @PriceActionCB]

@TheWitness2030 @junshiguancha1 The US has many issues. China leads the US in many aspects. But to state that China has better military capabilities using 20-40 year old stolen tech is a joke.

[Price Action Cowboy (PAC) @PriceActionCB]

@TheWitness2030 @junshiguancha1 Hahaha, facts only.