Peter

Thinking about thinking & Sharing it.

How to disagree, still get along and learn.

[MJTruthUltra @MJTruthUltra]

Take a Guess how many years she got?

Q: “How many votes do you think you can deliver for us?”

Raquel Rodriquez:
“At least 5,000..”

Q: “How much is that gonna cost?”

Rodriquez:
“I’m looking at $55,000..”

The answer is ZERO… The charges against Raquel (Rachel) Rodriguez were dropped because the Texas Attorney General’s office was legally disqualified from prosecuting the case. The charges were ultimately dismissed without a trial or conviction. Local prosecutors never picked up the case.

5,000 votes for $55,000 from one single person… can change the outcome of an entire state. And she never spent a day in prison.

https://t.co/zMN0UdBfNw

[Peter @PrimePremise]

@jayplemons @MattWalshBlog If it saves just one life….

[Peter @PrimePremise]

@TRobinsonNewEra Why are you not stomping the life out of that fucker??

[Grok @grok]

Assuming independent votes with true p=0.3 support, P(0 votes in 24,000) = 0.7^24000 ≈ 2.25 × 10^{-3718}.

That's 1 in ~4.4 × 10^{3717} — smaller than picking one specific atom in the universe at random, repeatedly.

Statistically, this outcome is effectively impossible under fair random sampling. It points to either non-representative ballots or an anomaly.

[Bitcoin Teddy @Bitcoin_Teddy]

Javier Milei: “I thought being on the left was a mental problem. The empirical evidence is so overwhelming that it never worked anywhere, and they refused to accept it.”

“But what I discovered is that being on the left is a disease of the soul. The left is built on envy, hatred, resentment, and unequal treatment under the law. They are very violent, and since they have no way or arguments to answer, they go for physical violence.”

[Peter @PrimePremise]

@thenewarea51 I hate it when that happens.

[Peter @PrimePremise]

@JayInslee Clearly if we cover our eyes, you don’t disappear. Unfortunately.

[Peter @PrimePremise]

@BluCalGir @bennyjohnson only takes time if you're cheating....

[Peter @PrimePremise]

@Turbinetraveler oopsie.

[Peter @PrimePremise]

@atensnut The driver hasn't been arrested for racism yet?

[Peter @PrimePremise]

@aviationbrk oopsie.

[Peter @PrimePremise]

@mr175football @VigilantFox @ShannonSharpe @neiltyson

[Peter @PrimePremise]

@luckydogtwit88 @TravisH56960544 @pmarca Vilify villains.

Need that on a t-shirt

[Peter @PrimePremise]

@NobodymrRobert ‘Tarded

[Peter @PrimePremise]

@LiuInTheShadows Option 4: Surrender, close the business. Enjoy playing golf and riding your yacht.

[Declaration of Memes @LibertyCappy]

Let my man cook. 🔥

😎

[Laura Powell @LauraPowellEsq]

Cop pulls over a woman and tells her he saw her holding a cell phone in her right hand.

She doesn’t have a right hand.

Her response is perfect: “So do want to just call this a day, or...?” 😂

[Dries Van Langenhove @DVanLangenhove]

A very sad announcement.

I have just been convicted a second time for 'hate speech' and it is only due to a technicality that I could not immediately be sent to jail —to the judge's frustration.

In an ironic turn of events it's actually thanks to my previous prison sentence (for memes in a private group chat) that I am now still free —in a physical sense, at least.

Call me naive but I didn't think they would take it this far, given that this precedent criminalises many of the arguments used by even the most moderate politicians critical of mass migration.

In February 2024 I gave a lecture at Catholic University Leuven wherein I linked mass migration to crime and a deterioration of our quality of life. Every single point I made was 100% the truth and based on scientific evidence.

Cynically, even the judge that convicted me admits as much by writing in his verdict: “Even if all of the statements made by Van Langenhove are based on scientific evidence and statistics, it makes no difference to the criminal intent. Van Langenhove is not charged with spreading false information. He is charged with presenting facts in a way that incites hatred against persons on the grounds of one or more of the protected criteria in the Anti-Racism Law.”

That's a lot of words just to say he wants to send me to prison for speaking the truth.

Even the regime media write: "It did not matter to the court that Van Langenhove was quoting scientific sources. The judge argued that Van Langenhove's main message was that a big part of the societal problems like insecurity, housing shortages and lowering educational standards are due to mass migration."

You may think the regime media are being sympathetic to me in the first sentence, but in reality they are warning people: even if you speak the truth, if you go against our narrative, we will crush you in every way possible.

Both the public prosecutor and the judge did not present a single real argument as to how or against whom I would have incited hatred. So even if I would accept their crazy, dystopic law, I still did not break it.

The only argument they present is that I created a "hostile atmosphere of us versus them” in regards to migrants. But even this silly argument (which is not even a punishable offence) is not true. To me, the deadly disease is self-hatred and one of its worst symptoms is replacement migration. My enemy is thus NOT the migrants themselves but those orchestrating the mass migration.

Sadly, in Belgium, evidence is not needed and ‘vibes’ are enough to put someone in jail.

Given the fact that I have another court case coming up in September and that I have a dozen active criminal investigations for hate speech, time is running out for me. I have already paid more than €420,000 in legal fees and there is no ending in sight. I have been in an intense battle of attrition for eight years and must now regroup to make sure I can still win.

If you want to help me, you can do so via the links below. If you can help in other ways, please contact me via DM.

If you live in a country that still has free speech, never let them touch it, however noble they make the motives sound, because this is where it leads to.