Why was Hagrid punished for an accident while Snape got away with deliberate cruelty?
When Draco got injured by Buckbeak, Hagrid faced an investigation, Buckbeak was sentenced to death, and Hagrid feared losing everything.
Yet Snape could insult students, target Neville’s biggest fears, threaten to poison Trevor, and constantly humiliate Harry without facing any real consequences. Both teachers made students miserable, but only one seemed to answer for what happened in his classroom.
So what exactly were Hogwarts’ rules on teacher misconduct? And why did Dumbledore tolerate Snape’s behaviour while Hagrid was treated like a danger to his students?
La vraie raison c'est qu'il voulait juste me faire iech en donnant le poste à quelqu'un de très nul alors que je suis plus apte à enseigner cette matière
Why did Dumbledore let Lockhart teach at Hogwarts despite knowing that he was a fraud? Wasn't he concerned about the students’ education and safety? Could he have used other ways to expose Lockhart?