This, but the frustrating corollary is that they *should* use “AI” (and by that I mean ML) to make substantive improvements to their ops that go beyond a McKinsey-style “fire everyone and then rehire them eight months later.” Supply chain, employee wellbeing etc. Many such cases
How, you ask, does this happen?
The answer is so boring. Some guy on the Yum! Brands board attends a rambling citation-free Davos dinner w AI execs, hears their ambling sci-fi marketing pitch, and writes a one-line Signal message to the taco CEO “need AI strategy asap”
Voila.
“Free BAA review by an AI app” is the legal equivalent of “hey look at how fun it is to hold this silvery metal that’s liquid at room temperature in your hands!”
“Sign up now, you probably won’t die!”
Lawyers are expensive. Our AI reviews legal contracts for FREE. Trained on expert legal minds.
Free BAA Review.
Free NDA Review.
Free AI Chatbot to ask questions about your legal doc.
Sign up now. Start cutting legal costs: https://t.co/AotrI1ni5F
Note: Info not legal advice
@focusfronting The reason this debate is happening is all the people who agree that philosophy is easy are thinking of Quine and Ayer, and most of the people disagreeing are thinking of Hegel and Deleuze. A/C divide strikes again
@tyorrique I think that’s right. He gets a lot more “the Nothing itself noths” after 1934 but, then again, he makes *a lot* of bad choices in that particular time period