Patriotic American 🇺🇸

I am your everyday patriotic American expressing my thoughts, ideas, views, and opinions from the perspective of a regular blue collar working guy.

[Patriotic American 🇺🇸 @ProFreedomFirst]

@elonmusk @elonmusk Here’s an idea for you:

Name: GalaxyX

Slogan: Why limit yourself to the amazon, when there’s a whole galaxy out there - GalaxyX!

100% needed since they appear to have become continuously synonymous with failing their blue collar customer base.

[Steve 🇺🇸 @SteveLovesAmmo]

I need every single Conservative in the United States to watch this video.

This is the most important video that I will put out for midterm elections in November.

[Patriotic American 🇺🇸 @ProFreedomFirst]

@IJ perhaps you could weigh in for us everyday folks with your thoughts considering many may feel that the legal requirement of obtaining a search warrant pursuant to a probable cause affidavit portraying one version of evidence to be viewed as more probable than not simply isn’t good enough to protect the people. We have seen plenty of judges find probable cause under rather questionable circumstances.

Moreover, the argument for government employees finding unique ways around the guardrails intended to protect the public against misconduct & misuse seems to be a fair position for a ban, and not just over layering regulation which can potentially be defeated or misinterpreted. I don’t think that’s a balanced approach when considering past history and the potential future going forward and how it likely plays out based on they history and coupled with the totality of the circumstances.

Lastly, one could most certainly argue that widespread government surveillance is not only in direct contrast with our 4th Amendment protections, but also the very spirit our country’s laws as suggested by the very evidence contained in our country’s founding documents U.S. Constitution & Bill Of Rights. To work so diligently on protecting the people from unreasonable government intrusion at our inception through a point where widespread government surveillance is the norm would almost certainly be considered “chilling” on exercising several rights, at least to any reasonable and prudent person who wishes to do so.

I think we all understand that not every fair point in a well educated position taken in an argument can always be articulated to the degree one might hope for, if even provided at all while trying to keep the position clear and concise to optimize the potential for a successful outcome. However, don’t these points support a stronger argument and justify a more hardline stance in the position against them? It is my opinion they do; and my hope is your team will agree and adjust accordingly for a stronger strategy in relief for all on the issue.

Thanks for the work your organization does, as well as the time in consideration the thoughts of one patriotic American among many. I appreciate it.

[Patriotic American 🇺🇸 @ProFreedomFirst]

@IJ perhaps you could weigh in for us everyday folks with your thoughts considering many may feel that the legal requirement of obtaining a search warrant pursuant to a probable cause affidavit portraying one version of evidence to be viewed as more probable than not simply isn’t good enough to protect the people. We have seen plenty of judges find probable cause under rather questionable circumstances.

Moreover, the argument for government employees finding unique ways around the guardrails intended to protect the public against misconduct & misuse seems to be a fair position for a ban, and not just over layering regulation which can potentially be defeated or misinterpreted. I don’t think that’s a balanced approach when considering past history and the potential future going forward and how it likely plays out based on they history and coupled with the totality of the circumstances.

Lastly, one could most certainly argue that widespread government surveillance is not only in direct contrast with our 4th Amendment protections, but also the very spirit our country’s laws as suggested by the very evidence contained in our country’s founding documents U.S. Constitution & Bill Of Rights. To work so diligently on protecting the people from unreasonable government intrusion at our inception through a point where widespread government surveillance is the norm would almost certainly be considered “chilling” on exercising several rights, at least to any reasonable and prudent person who wishes to do so.

I think we all understand that not every fair point in a well educated position taken in an argument can always be articulated to the degree one might hope for, if even provided at all while trying to keep the position clear and concise to optimize the potential for a successful outcome. However, don’t these points support a stronger argument and justify a more hardline stance in the position against them? It is my opinion they do; and my hope is your team will agree and adjust accordingly for a stronger strategy in relief for all on the issue.

Thanks for the work your organization does, as well as the time in consideration the thoughts of one patriotic American among many. I appreciate it.

[Patriotic American 🇺🇸 @ProFreedomFirst]

🤦

[DataRepublican (small r) @DataRepublican]

Hello Senator Thune,

Let's expose what you're really doing with "reconciliation."

You announced it yesterday, eleven months after the House passed the SAVE America Act. You're not trying to pass this bill. You're trying to kill it in a way you can blame on process.

Here's how we know:

Reconciliation requires the Senate parliamentarian to rule that provisions are "budgetary." Citizenship verification is not budgetary. Photo ID mandates are not budgetary. The parliamentarian will gut the bill. Then you'll shrug and say "we tried." We see through you.

Meanwhile, you WON'T use the tools that actually work:

Rule XIX limits each senator to two speeches per legislative day. Keep the Senate in continuous session, file cloture daily, and the filibuster exhausts in ~12-20 days. You dismissed it as "complicated." Because if you tried and succeeded, you'd have to actually pass the bill.

Harry Reid nuked the filibuster in 2013 when he wanted results.

Mitch McConnell changed Senate rules THREE times and canceled the August recess.

Chuck Schumer used reconciliation within months on a 50-50 Senate.

You have 53 seats. You've changed nothing, canceled nothing, and waited eleven months.

Now let's talk donors:

• Goldman Sachs: $150K to you - top H-1B user
• Google: $75K - lobbies against E-Verify
• Meta: $72.5K - Zuckerberg's FWD[.]us pushes mass immigration
• Wells Fargo: $90K - banks undocumented immigrants

Same corporations sponsor Punchbowl News, where you sit for "Fly Out Days" which nobody watches except Congress staffers and K Street lobbyists who pays premium bucks for legislative intelligence. Their reporter then telegraphs to the audience the SAVE Act "will ultimately fail."

Corporate money flows to you AND to the outlet that frames your inaction as inevitable.

We see the loop.

You called grassroots anger a "paid influencer ecosystem." YOU are the paid influencer. You take the wrong side of a 80% issue because you are indistinguishable from a K Street mouthpiece, and an ineffective one to boot who won't bend the rules to get anything passed.

What we want:

1. Force a real talking filibuster.
2. Stop hiding behind process.
3. Pass the SAVE America Act.

YOU will become the reason that we will have our butts kicked in midterms. Not Candace Owens, not Nick Fuentes, not anyone else. You and you alone, and all because you want to make the 200 or so viewers of Punchbowl Fly Out Days happy. You're living in a K Street information bubble, addicted to the comforts and praises of lobbyists masquerading as journalists. You mistake the steak and martini dinners you get invited to as your own constituents.

You are not "moderate." The SAVE America Act has 98% support among Republicans. Name one other thing that has 98% support. You are an extreme minority who prides himself on being a calm leader, when in reality you are well in the running for the most ineffective Majority leader of all time.

Prove me wrong. Do the bare modicum of effort. Not symbolic. Actual effort. Cancel the recess. Get SAVE America Act passed.

[Catturd ™ @catturd2]

OMG - 😂😂😂😂

[Patriotic American 🇺🇸 @ProFreedomFirst]

It seems some may have forgotten the solemn vow to “never forget.” Now, a communist transplant has infiltrated our great nation, hell-bent on dragging an iconic city - which is already teetering on the brink of historic peril - into its darkest abyss yet.

My fervent hope is that the unyielding spirit of true American citizens pierces this encroaching gloom, turning any scars into profound lessons in patriotism rather than irreversible ruin. Best wishes to New York City as it embarks on this perilous experiment with communism, thinly veiled as socialism.