Jeffrey Epstein’s brother states in the interview:
“We know Jeffrey had dirt on Donald Trump. We know that. That’s a fact. He said in 2016 with the election that if he said what he knew about Donald Trump, they’d have to cancel the election”
Anytime Trump’s been caught red handed, he claims it was a hoax made up by his enemies (Dems). Instead of restating the official stance that the Epstein files dont exist, Trump now claims the files are a hoax written by his enemies…This confirms beyond doubt Trump’s in the files
This human bobblehead is such an atrocious asshat who bends over for Trump at the snap of a finger
Same turd who previously went on public record saying he and all his @GOP colleagues knew @mattgaetz sexually preyed on minor girls…only to later support him as Trump’s AG nominee
Q: Do you believe in free speech?
GOP Sen. Mullin: There's a thin line between free speech and when it crosses a line and causes violence. When you start calling someone 'fascist'...there is a problem
@monster_kermit@osbornforne The alternative is instead of paying $12 per month with occasional ads, they charge you $25 without ads. There’s a lot of issues with corporate corruption and greed, but this stance by Osborn aint it. I favor Osborn over Ricketts, but this statement by him is just silly
This isn’t Moscow or Beijing. It’s Chicago. Masked federal agents grabbed U.S. citizens protesting ICE and threw them into an unmarked van.
“Who are you? Where are you taking them?” people shouted. “You are kidnapping them!”
What has America become?
Old enough to remember when some people cheered how he would be peace time.
Now they cheer for the… *checks notes*… department of war.
Anyways, enjoy your Saturday!
🍻
@osbornforne In other words, its a form of manufacturer provided financing. All that a right to repair policy would do is cause manufacturers to shift the costs forward to the point of purchase… instead of a new combine being $750k with a 10-year CSA, that same combine will cost $1M+
@osbornforne Dan - the issue with “right to repair” is it doesn’t consider the actual business and financing implications. Many manufacturers of large equipment sell the equipment at cost or a small loss and make their money on the CSA as a way to reduce upfront capital burdens for buyers
@Siadek4Liberty@dutchberniefan@BernieSanders@AbdulElSayed And how would that change under the system you proposed? Having limited/no government oversight wouldn’t have prevented the opioid epidemic… there would just be a heck of a lot more of those types of cases…
@Siadek4Liberty@dutchberniefan@BernieSanders@AbdulElSayed U.S. life expectancy over time certainly seems to indicate all benefit under the current system. Your suggestion for removing “the cloud” over big pharma is to remove oversight and going back to the times where snake oil salesmen and witchdoctors benefited at others’ expense?
@Siadek4Liberty@dutchberniefan@BernieSanders@AbdulElSayed Also, for someone who believes the free market is the most efficient and equitable approach to decision making, you’d think the fact that both historically and personally, the free will of the people repeatedly rejected this utopian-based political ideology would resonate w/ you
@Siadek4Liberty@dutchberniefan@BernieSanders@AbdulElSayed Who required that improved sanitation and access to clean water… ? Ah that’s right - the government identified the underling cause of the issue and implemented the solution to fix the problem…. But those facts and history lessons don’t matter to Libertarians (or you). …
@Siadek4Liberty@dutchberniefan@BernieSanders@AbdulElSayed No, medical advancement changed that…. And in the U.S., who provides a substantial amount of the early stage funding for medical research?
The Government!
(Many Europeans nations had accumulated vast wealth prior to the industrial revolution…)
@Siadek4Liberty@dutchberniefan@BernieSanders@AbdulElSayed Maybe in some utopian universe, but in the real world we live in, history has proven that to be patently false. During the industrial revolution, you think the pre-school aged children forced to work long hours in terrible conditions were “free”?
@Siadek4Liberty@dutchberniefan@BernieSanders@AbdulElSayed Walmart eventually gained such scale, that they were then able to dictate prices to suppliers, who then cut wages in order to meet those price demands. It’s an ongoing cycle where the only person benefiting from Walmart is Sam Walton, not his employees, consumers, suppliers, etc
@Siadek4Liberty@dutchberniefan@BernieSanders@AbdulElSayed But once those competitors go out of business, there is an increase in labor supply and lower labor demand, meaning wages decrease (w/o min wage), while at the same time consumer demand stays constant and consumer supply decreases, meaning prices increase