@darkqualza@GonzoTheGreat03@MiruneMochi I’m not even surprised this is the answer. I over complicated it since I didn’t have evidence, but alas Occam’s Razor proves reliable.
@darkqualza@GonzoTheGreat03@MiruneMochi Btw it’s not called “white knighting,” it’s called standing up for someone.
I don’t even know who she is. I don’t follow her. She’s a person deserving of respect. Tf does her being a VTuber have to do with that?
@darkqualza@GonzoTheGreat03@MiruneMochi No. Just bc it was framed as a question, that does not mean that was the particular intent of the question, as opposed to the obviously implied condescending presumption.
So you’re running away now, coward?
@darkqualza@GonzoTheGreat03@MiruneMochi She did not claim anyone called her slurs in this thread. You’re making assumptions again. And deflecting, like a coward.
@darkqualza@GonzoTheGreat03@MiruneMochi Not asking for an apology ≠ not entitled to one.
That is not what an assumption is. Even if I were wrong, it’d be an accusation, not an assumption. You are lying, obviously. And you’re a coward bc you refuse to admit your mistake. Coward does not automatically = running away.
@darkqualza@GonzoTheGreat03@MiruneMochi the wording is presumptuous.
You’re also assuming I’m not calm. Very ironic of you to assume my tone, while claiming everyone misunderstood yours. FYI it’s entirely possible to be calm and assertive, as I am.
@darkqualza@GonzoTheGreat03@MiruneMochi It is extremely wrong. It’s an ableist, defaultist, normative assumption.
That post claims ppl EXPECT you to assume ppl are disabled, it doesn’t admit to having made the opposite assumption. Either way, you’ve contradicted yourself.
Adding a ? doesn’t make it inquisitive when
@darkqualza@GonzoTheGreat03@MiruneMochi I’m not asking you to apologize to me, I’m saying you should apologize to OP. Your assumptions are harmful and inconsiderate. No one’s refusing to understand, you’re a liar and a coward.
@darkqualza@GonzoTheGreat03@MiruneMochi You can’t even keep your story straight for 15 minutes. Now you admit you made an assumption. Assumptions are self-evidently invalid if they’re wrong. You were wrong to assume, and in admitting that you did so, it’s clear that your last reply was dishonest.
@darkqualza@GonzoTheGreat03@MiruneMochi If there was any truth to that you wouldn’t have written three posts doubling down on your assumption, in which you claim going to the grocer in person is “common sense.” Your wording wasn’t lazy, it was presumptuous. Just admit your mistake and apologize like an adult.
@darkqualza@GonzoTheGreat03@MiruneMochi At minimum you could be more inquisitive to begin with (eg, is “walking/driving not an option?”). That way you don’t assume one way or the other. But really, when the question is “How do I do X?”, “Do Y instead” is rarely a good answer. Answer the question asked, or say nothing.
@Tooru_ch That’s understandable then. I suppose it’s just the way you worded it, as a clarification, seemed to imply it was what you meant from the start. But I appreciate your open mindedness on the topic (that is EXTREMELY hard to come by), as well as this clarification.
@SilverNivalis@Pirat_Nation Sakurai isn’t part of Nintendo. Even if Nintendo wasn’t creating innovative games, that’s not on him. They hire him to develop games THEY want made.
@Tooru_ch That would be the first interpretation I proposed, and what I think a lot of us assumed and took issue with. As you’ve now admitted yourself, a lot of real artists do this, so it is not reasonable to distrust someone/suspect them of using AI for something so normal.
@Tooru_ch What does your original post mean if not “I suspect anyone who types their signature uses AI”? “I don’t trust AI artists who type their signatures” would inherently imply you DO trust AI artists that don’t. Otherwise why say this at all? I can’t find any other sensible meaning.
@supermochi64@NovaThePug@the_Maafia discovery simply bc they made it only with their own eyes is delusional. It is the reason you’re being accused of AI psychosis. Ppl can no longer comprehend the value of the human mind.
@supermochi64@NovaThePug@the_Maafia Done with this braindead conversation after this, but the last thing I’ll say is, again, I think there is value in substantiating something that isn’t clear. But it is only supplementary to the original discovery. To argue that one uncovering the right answer is not the original