💭

[💭 @Prof3ssFin3ss3]

https://t.co/igRDvDiTb8

[💭 @Prof3ssFin3ss3]

@flykites1488 Hardly harsh considering they made it abundantly clear. You just shit post to engage with fat Wiccan bitches or what?

[💭 @Prof3ssFin3ss3]

@flykites1488 @more_amalek @DanBilzerian Say the kid larping as an all insightful sage

[💭 @Prof3ssFin3ss3]

@more_amalek @DanBilzerian Such a professional & so knowledgeable he has to block anyone calling out his dialectic. Crypto Jew sowing FUD

[💭 @Prof3ssFin3ss3]

Lmfao you’re in so deep you don’t even know what you’re arguing. You just want to be right

People aren’t pissed because the Jews wrote the Bible nor do they care whether or not the Bible permits their practices. People are pissed because rabbis defend sucking baby blood and marrying kids hence Dans initial tweet yet you’re here solely to argue whether the Talmud is the book of law or not

[💭 @Prof3ssFin3ss3]

@Switchshots18 @Timcast He’s intentionally obtuse as to not fan the flames of Belfast. He’s a shill, chandler. Wake up

[💭 @Prof3ssFin3ss3]

@more_amalek @DanBilzerian So attack the Bible rather than the individuals practicing perverse radical interpretations of the Bible?

[💭 @Prof3ssFin3ss3]

@EmmaCDeSouza Femicide yourself stupid cunt

[💭 @Prof3ssFin3ss3]

“And rabbis have spent centuries arguing around, limiting, and reinterpreting some of the more controversial passages you're referring to. That's precisely why understanding the distinction matters.”

Spent centuries debating whether child marriage was acceptable? Do you hear yourself?

Next you’re going to tell metzitzah b'peh is necessary because rabbis mouths are sanitary and therapeutic, huh?

[💭 @Prof3ssFin3ss3]

@MajToure People will continue to treat yall like shit until you hold your community accountable. That boy was guilty from the jump, parents tricked off $700k instead of putting towards his defense, & yall still defended all of them every step of the way

[BowTiedRanger @BowTiedRanger]

The cucked dad should be going to prison too after betraying and dishonoring his dead son like that.

[💭 @Prof3ssFin3ss3]

@RT_com Going to have to revise legalese into layman’s terms so activist judges can’t do shit like this anymore

[💭 @Prof3ssFin3ss3]

You’re arguing semantics though. The Supreme Court interprets and finalizes enforcement of the constitution via case precedent the same way the Talmud attempts to do so with the Torah, albeit by debate. Surely you have more of a problem with rabbis defending child marriage than dumbass Dan referring to the Talmud colloquially as the Jewish book of law, right?

[💭 @Prof3ssFin3ss3]

@realAFLF Surely the family saved some the $700k for an appeal process, right?

[💭 @Prof3ssFin3ss3]

@more_amalek @DanBilzerian Well the Supreme Court sets the precedent by which constitutional law is enforced so if the Talmud sets precedent for allowing child marriage, what are you even arguing?

[💭 @Prof3ssFin3ss3]

@YawfettiTheOne_ @jdmiles11 @mackdiddymike Defending himself via stabbing instead of walking away. It’s gonna cost that boy a lot more than his freedom but at least his parents were able to chimp off $700k

[💭 @Prof3ssFin3ss3]

@BLove415 @tariqnasheed Open a book. Any book

[💭 @Prof3ssFin3ss3]

@Idontgiveafk82 @youngdonforvr Circling back to this. You gonna visit your boy over the next 40 years?

[💭 @Prof3ssFin3ss3]

@orthonormalist You’ve sowed. Now you reap.

[💭 @Prof3ssFin3ss3]

@KaurUdhoke2 Probably wouldn’t happen in India. Should probably consider moving home