How will/should Zoom and other videoconferencing tech affect forum non conveniens analysis? @maggiekgardner points to an interesting analysis in a recent student note:
https://t.co/z81hkOFspo
The Eighth Circuit reinstated part of Missouri's Covid suit against China. What happens next? @ProfBillDodge has some thoughts: https://t.co/uLarqCrX86
#Missouri#China
Fascinating decision on SOLs, borrowing statute, and Ecuadoran law in the long running banana pesticide litigation. @zclopton has the details: https://t.co/YxIHchKT4D
2. FTAs: 🤔 Why are FTAs in the US courts, you ask?
Well, one is, tx to a comity arg raised by Missouri companies when they were sued by Peruvian plaintiffs. They claim the US-Peru FTA means the case should be dismissed. Oral arg. is tmrw.
Read 👉
https://t.co/8dBqKnhWW3
/2
2. FTAs: 🤔 Why are FTAs in the US courts, you ask?
Well, one is, tx to a comity arg raised by Missouri companies when they were sued by Peruvian plaintiffs. They claim the US-Peru FTA means the case should be dismissed. Oral arg. is tmrw.
Read 👉
https://t.co/8dBqKnhWW3
/2
The CISG covers billions of dollars of goods contracts. So are US courts finally becoming aware of it? John Coyle (@Tarheel_Lawprof) discusses an empirical study showing the the number of cases is actually declining:
https://t.co/Vc5uGwdMvi
In the second of two posts, @ProfBillDodge discusses three cases of the U.S. applying its law extraterritorially that violate international law.
https://t.co/xN5JyZzkra
Is it possible to challenge OFAC sanctions in US court? @andrew_coyner analyzes a recent case showing just how hard this can be:
https://t.co/cs0cKGSFTI
#OFAC#sanctions
If a court in New York recognizes a judgment rendered by a foreign court, is that act of recognition entitled to full faith and credit in the other 49 states? @ProfBillDodge has some thoughts.
https://t.co/U0H5jrxq23
China has adopted the restrictive theory of foreign state immunity, allowing suits against foreign countries based on non-governmental acts. A big deal, @ProfBillDodge explains, but just the same as the US and most other countries:
https://t.co/gC1jubT8VK
Continuing our coverage of the CA2's decision in Fuld striking down the PSJVTA, @zclopton explains how Fuld is consistent with SCOTUS personal jurisdiction cases but misleading in its emphasis on margins:
https://t.co/mGxlbTr4FT
On Friday, the Second Circuit found there was no personal jurisdiction over the PLO in two Antiterrorism Act cases, holding that there are limits to what Congress can define as consent. @maggiekgardner has the analysis: https://t.co/C1RrWoNqjF
Last Term's decision in Abitron v. Hetronic rewrote the presumption against extraterritoriality yet again. As @ProfBillDodge explains, this is not a good thing:
https://t.co/d8XijQj9Ou
China has adopted a new law on foreign state immunity: https://t.co/gA6dYZOXUQ
For prior TLB coverage see https://t.co/VQqbtaQKO4 and https://t.co/qj4rqMCjGc
@WaibelM09 True that the Article 7 adds "borrowing and lending," but it also instructs PRC courts to consider purpose as well as nature, which may end up immunizing some sovereign debt issuances. English translation of the final law here: https://t.co/7GL05yjWtd
SCOTUS will address the important issue of enforceability of choice of law clauses in the Great Lakes case. John Coyle (@Tarheel_Lawprof) discusses the very different perspective presented in Respondent's brief:
https://t.co/62esrt7VPp