Yo tengo info de lo que pasó.
Antes de empezar el partido les notificaron que tendrían un arbitraje justo y neutral, eso no gustó mucho en el grupo Paredes, De Paul, Cuti y Nahuel estaban muy indignados, se preguntaban que como lograrían ganar la copa? Y Messi que en el fondo sabía que no tendría oportunidad de esa manera les decía de dedicarse a jugar (pegar patadas y ensuciar el juego)
En el baño de mi oficina pusieron sensores para que se apague la luz después de un rato si no hay movimiento. Ahora tienes que cagar aleteando como pájaro. Ya no puedes hacer nada en paz.
Un compañero de trabajo no le dijo a nadie que se estaba jubilando. Simplemente un día terminó de trabajar y al otro día ya no vino más. Ese hombre entendió que sus compañeros de trabajo no eran sus amigos.
I’ve been a developer for 10 years.
I’ve mastered languages. I’ve optimized databases. I’ve built systems that handle millions of requests.
But last week, a Junior dev outperformed me.
He didn’t know how to write a complex program. He couldn’t explain the difference between a proper monoloth and a microservice. He didn't even know how the code worked in some parts.
But he knew how to talk to the Agents.
He orchestrated three AI workers. One for the frontend. One for the backend logic. One for the unit tests.
In 4 hours, he pushed a feature that would have taken me 3 days.
I felt a cold shiver. "Is this it?" I thought. "Am I finally the legacy hardware?"
But then I looked at his PR. It was fast. It was functional. But it was… fragile.
It lacked architectural vision. It had security holes that only someone who has been "burned" would see. It was a house built on sand.
That’s when I realized the truth about 2026.
The "Senior" title isn't about how fast you type anymore. It's about how well you judge.
We are moving from being "builders" to being "architects." From "coders" to "composers."
If you’re a veteran feeling left behind by AI: Don’t compete on speed. Compete on wisdom.
The machine can write the notes. Only you can write the symphony.
BREAKING: Google Gemini launched a new feature called Guided Learning.
You can now use it to learn literally anything, step by step, like a personal tutor.
Here’s how to access it 👇
Repeating your prompt can make LLMs significantly more accurate.
Google just showed a trivial change that wins 47 of 70 tests.
No extra tokens. No added latency. Zero losses reported.
𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗺𝗽𝘁 𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗲𝘁𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗶𝗺𝗽𝗿𝗼𝘃𝗲𝘀 𝗮𝗰𝗰𝘂𝗿𝗮𝗰𝘆
The method is simple. Send the exact same input twice, back to back.
Language models read tokens in order.
Early parts get processed without full context.
On the second pass, the full picture already exists.
Predictions become more stable and more accurate.
𝗜𝘁 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸𝘀 𝗮𝗰𝗿𝗼𝘀𝘀 𝗺𝗮𝗷𝗼𝗿 𝗺𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗹𝘀
The paper tests popular systems at scale.
Every evaluated model improves without reasoning enabled.
Key results:
> 47 wins out of 70 benchmarks
> Zero accuracy regressions
> No increase in output length
> No measurable latency cost
𝗜𝘁 𝗮𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄𝘀 𝗱𝗿𝗼𝗽-𝗶𝗻 𝗱𝗲𝗽𝗹𝗼𝘆𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁
Outputs keep the same format. Existing pipelines stay unchanged.
You get higher accuracy by copying and pasting once.
gpt is ruining my work life balance, its like having a phd student that never stops working, so then I never stop. I keep wanting to stay up for another 45 min to see if it correctly did my proof sketch or fixed the issue I found in previous message. Bedtime getting pushed later and later and weekends disappearing to prompting gpt.
@charliesheen@luitorres17 Watching aka Charlie Sheen right now... thank you for this jewel. I had a friend who coped his entire life with substance abuse. So, I do think it is a miracle.💞 Do not loose track of your enormous charisma and talent. Keep on winning.