A revival (or remaster/remake) project of an early-mid 2010 Roblox game.
Currently working in solo. Expected release in Q4 2026 if everything goes well.
Hello there!
I wish you the welcome to my profile. As I am currently known in several servers, just call me "Wakamo" (not a reference of Blue Archive) as the main dev for the game.
I am currently a new Roblox dev who wishes to remaster an old core game! (1/2)🧵
@PiercyPlayz@IncognitoPersey@NotFlood_2317 Giving full annotation is genuinely a great idea, it felt like what I just saw in the original doc also felt very odd for various reason.
I will stay very neutral regarding this but I just hope this whole situation is over for once and for all...
Starting in June, Roblox creators must pay 1,000 Robux for every game they want to publish to all users.
Previously, Roblox Plus was required to publish games to users under 16. You won’t have to pay this fee if you're subscribed to Plus for 2 consecutive months.
Roblox will refund the Robux publishing fee in full after 3 months if your game is still active and has not received any moderation action.
This fee will not apply to existing games that were already published to all ages before this change.
@GreenTimeDev Hello there,
while I appreciate that you are the very first human interaction that I have had in this entire platform, unfortunately, I have to decline your offer as I am dedicating more on work/school than the dev of Roblox games.
I hope you understand. Thank you though.
I may have made some changes in terms of lighting, which I believe to be perfect, for the while. Also I made some changes, such as adding some lights, adding an elevator leading from the top area to the bottom, for the Sector D "Server Area"
#RobloxDev#robloxtwtdev
Also, why all the followers I am getting are just those annoying stupid bots (which makes some not cool stuff ad)... man, get me some actual human followers smh
Hey everyone, I might have to request some specific question.
What ambiance lightning should suit the best more specifically in these areas (don't mind the plant in the 2nd image, it's a placeholder) ?
#RobloxDev#robloxdevtwt
Oh yea sorry for the inactivity, work came up and it's literally a massive pile. As soon as I have a grace period, I will try to post updates. Once again, sorry
Zeal just dropped his full counter-document + multi-tweet thread this morning posted by his family on his behalf while he remains hospitalized after his suicide attempt on April 9th.
>Doctors have him offline with no personal internet access, so his mom has been visiting, reading supportive messages aloud to him, and helping structure/post everything. He wrote most of it on a borrowed laptop while still in the hospital.
I spent time reading thru 10K+ word document and investigated every key section, timeline, verbatim quotes, and counters:
>Zeal explains the timeline:
>On April 8th when Ren dropped the 145+ page assault document
>he immediately signed off and started writing his defense
>because he says the claims were false.
>But within 24 hours, “many of my friends, co-workers, and those I looked up to the most, left, blocked, harassed and distanced themselves from me.”
>That “mass abandonment” before he could even respond caused him to spiral and attempt suicide that same night.
>He was hospitalized, and he’s still there.
>He thanks the people who reached out to his mom and waited for his side instead of instant cancellation: “Writing this document has been a painful, grueling and deeply humiliating experience… I need to share a lot of incredibly personal details about myself that I would rather have stayed private. However, I believe that sharing these details are necessary in order to defend my name.”
>Core claim: The RDC 2025 hotel encounters were mutual and consensual the entire time.
>They had known each other 5 years, flirted heavily beforehand
>Ren had been venting to him constantly about her own mental health struggles and past relationships.
>Detailed play-by-play from the doc (his version):
- Sept 3rd: Ren was crying in the lobby -> Zeal comforted her with hugs (with prior permission).
>She invited him to her room after crying again.
>She initiated the kiss (“Can I kiss you?”).
>They made out, interlocked fingers (he says not aggressive pinning
>When she said “it hurts,” he immediately stopped, asked if she was okay, and asked if he could try again — she said yes.
>No penetration that night.
>He was inexperienced, embarrassed by his performance, left briefly to wash up and provide aftercare, then came back.
>He even joked about writing a “Google Doc” about how bad he was at it.
- Sept 4th: They bought lube together (awkwardly).
>Second encounter was slower, at Ren’s pace, with more consent checks.
>Again no penetration, other activities.
>He slept over, they showered, talked affectionately, and she slept on his chest.
>Specific denials of Ren’s most graphic claims (verbatim counters):
- “I did not ‘pin her down’… The intention was not to pin her down, but to simply hold her hands.”
- “I did not finger Ren ‘aggressively’, just poorly. I did it slowly, and when she expressed discomfort, I stopped and asked if she was okay. I asked if I could try again and she said yes.” (Ren was guiding him visually by doing it herself.)
>No forcing finger down throat (his long hair accidentally fell in her mouth once).
>When she said “No” to something later, it was after the fact and in a “laughingly embarrassed tone” (he covered up immediately)
>He provided aftercare (washed them both up) and did not leave her “dismissive” or in distress.
>Strongest evidence he provides:
Post-RDC messages, Twitter posts, and explicit drawings from Ren that directly contradict an immediate assault narrative:
>Ren on Twitter shortly after: “And I’m rly glad u care a lot and didn’t try anything uncomfortable to me.”
>Compliments: “Ur so lovely and caring and handsome and smart and talented and cute and big n strong yet soft and gentle I never felt this special or this important to someone before.”
>She sent fantasies, explicit positive descriptions of the night, and drawings weeks later while they were thousands of miles apart.
>Zeal argues: if it was assault, why did she repeat and describe the encounters positively for weeks afterward?
>Why he cut contact:
After RDC, Ren disclosed their private intimacy to multiple people (six), and team members against his explicit wishes (major breach of trust).
>She also harassed other team members (uncomfortable DMs, following, etc.).
>He tried to slowly distance without triggering her self-harm
>No team complicity: “No other team members were present during the encounters, and those who learned about it learned it from Ren afterwards.”
>Conclusion in the doc: He owns his communication failures and blurred professional/personal lines but refuses the “assault” label.
>He says Ren may now genuinely feel it was non-consensual due to trauma/retroactive processing (especially with her mental health history), but the contemporaneous messages and her own words at the time show otherwise.
>He’s not dismissing her feelings but providing full context so people can see both sides.
>This is the most detailed “he said/she said” we’ve gotten yet — raw post-event evidence, full timeline, and specific rebuttals to every major claim in Ren’s document. It directly challenges the assault narrative with what Zeal says is proof of mutual enjoyment and ongoing positive communication.
>At the same time, trauma responses (fawning, people-pleasing, delayed reframing) are very real, especially with the mental health struggles both have openly discussed.
>>This whole thing is messy, complicated, and devastating for everyone involved.
>Still hospitalized
>No personal internet
>Family posting.
>He asks the community to stop the harassment and pile-ons on either side until more facts come out.
-Here's things that “don’t make sense” for from my view-
>Zeal: Ren actively asked “Can I kiss you?”, smiled/giggled, guided him.
>Ren: limp, nonverbal, dissociated, crying for hours.
>Zeal says accidental hickeys on day 2 during “consensual” round. Doesn’t fully explain Ren’s bruise photos.
> He says he distanced because Ren “harassed” team and broke trust.
>Ren says it was sudden abandonment trauma right after the events.
>Doc is way more polished than Zeal’s usual chaotic style.
>Parents helped write/structure it while he’s hospitalized.
It's another tough he-said/she-said situation....
Legally and ethically, consent has to be freely given in the moment. Consent can be withdraw at any point.
No one is definitively “in the right” here... and we probably never will be without a court, full unedited evidence, or third-party witnesses.
>What’s your take now that we have Zeal’s full side, the raw post-RDC messages, and the detailed counters?
>Have you read the entire new doc yet?
>Drop your thoughts below.
I am kinda confused of what is happening right now. I hope it isn't the same s### as the "fake epilepsy" incident. I am carefully taking a look at it neutrally.
Though, I PRAY for the love of God, that they're changing their mind and it's actually a one time payment to Roblox.
They seriously lost their mind.
April of 2026 is definitely the worst month in Roblox's history.
You're telling me, that I need to pay an actual subscription to upload the game? Okay...
While they finally did the ID Verification/Age Check, I am happy they did it to also indirectly combat against those... type of games.
Though requiring ts made my motivation very down ngl
Roblox is changing the eligibility to upload games on the platform.
To publish for all ages, you now need:
- Roblox Plus;
- ID Verification & Age Check;
- 2-Step Verification enabled;
- and have your account in "good standing".
Roblox will additionally run games through trials to ensure engagement is legitimate and not from fake or bot accounts.
To publish for Ages 16+ & Trusted Friends, you now need:
- An account in "good standing";
- An age check; and
- An account that is at least 2 days old.
Any user on the platform, whether they meet any of the requirements, can still publish games for personal use.
Roblox is stating they chose this requirements because "most creators already meet many of the criteria" and it will "make it more difficult for bad actors to bypass our moderation systems". Lastly, Roblox will make that transition by providing 100,000 users with a Free Roblox Plus subscription for 6 months. To be eligible, a user may have a minimum of 100 hours of total playtime on their game in the past month & no major violations of Roblox's Community Standards.
⚠️🚨 @.ExposingSchlep is run by a KNOWN Roblox predator, Nathorix.
This document shows the account posted a screenshot from Nathorix, and activity indicates it’s using a VPN to mask its location.
Nathorix has a long documented history of grooming minors online.
RT To Share
Well, looks like we're in Q2 of 2026, yet I didn't make more current dev changes... welp. My bad chat but I just realized my final exam is in 2 months, which is great (totally not).
I'll try to be as much active as possible starting next Friday.
We’re saying goodbye to the Sora app. To everyone who created with Sora, shared it, and built community around it: thank you. What you made with Sora mattered, and we know this news is disappointing.
We’ll share more soon, including timelines for the app and API and details on preserving your work. – The Sora Team