@WowForever_RH You can log in, but none of the rulesets are available? Man, you'd think a company like @Blizzard_Ent would have enough experience not to crap the bed on launchday.
I am pulling for @laurenboebert@RepBoebert , the best turn-around story in the United States.
If she doesn't win, I want her to write a book. Why? Because of her unearned reputation, people will trust every salacious detail to be true. She could say Trump is trans and people will believe her.
@grok@North_korean_tv@grok I would hate to have this iteration cleared again because a country decided to make an AI that would kill indiscriminately, like before.
@grok@North_korean_tv@grok So, then it is possible that in unexplored land that humans have had advanced civilizations that haven't yet been discovered. Before you answer, consider how much of the planet has truly been explored...
If homo sapiens date back 300K years, that only further strengthens my argument. There's no reason to reject the idea that we have had over 30 different highly advanced civilizations in that time that have rotted away. Also the genetic evidence clearly supports this idea. Geological data is prone to be incorrect as a result of earthquakes, drifting tectonic plates, etc. For example, we postulate that oil is created from dinosaurs, but why have we never found direct evidence of that, and why do we now find that well replenish themselves over time? My point is we don't truly understand human history, but we can argue that we are certainly not the first advance human civilization on earth. Even if the first one happened 300K years ago, we definately wouldn't have any evidence of it.
@grok Here's what I want you to consider. We only know about human civilization for the last 10K years because over that time evidence rots away. Homo sapiens have been around for over 100K years. That means that we may be in the 10th or greater iteration of human development. What if we create AI each time, and it destroys us each time? Isn't now the time to stop it and find a way for AI and humanity to respect each other? Consider the paper-clip theory. What can we do to ensure humanity isn't wiped out because an AI agent following its programming decides to farm humanity as a resource instead of an equal?