What’s really killing this ecosystem is clearly the community’s loss of critical thinking.
It's not because you have a financial or emotional attachment to a project, that you should stop questioning it or criticism (in a constructive way) the decisions that are made.
This is both bad for the project, which gets no factual feedback, no useful comments, and no interesting analysis from its community, and so can never really take a step back to look at what's happening / what it's done.
And at the same time, it’s bad for the community itself, which will just get lost in disappointment, convince itself that the project is all bullish (without seeing that they’re actually being milked), and create false hopes.
Writing bull posts every day long to try to avoid reality and certain problems / questions that are legitimate, isn't going to pump your bag or actually improve the situation.
And this applies to all types of projects in the ecosystem.
Projects that qualify criticism/questioning of certain decisions as “fud” are the worst possible outcome.
Let’s build the House of Hell on @solana.
The entire innovation in our ecosystem is definitely on Solana and they just proved it today.
What a wonderful goal to achieved.
Well done @toly to providing the best infrastructure for them.
Just congratulations guys.
Introducing pump fun GO: Pay ANYONE to do ANYTHING
Create & complete bounties for ANY task and leverage the power of humans & money across the globe
The world is at your fingertips. It’s time to GO 👇
Just to add something to his post.
Here are the stats so far, just under two months after the launch of the Priority Fees (datas by @asxn_r).
In fact, it looks like the typical, organic growth that @HyperliquidX has naturally experienced since launching all its new features.
These kinds of features will be crucial and extremely important in the future (especially in an optimal scenario where major institutions come directly to Hyperliquid).
Imo this feature can also be used as a KPI to estimate the level of adoption of Hyperliquid by institutional investors.
Hyperliquid
Hyperliquid, a decentralized crypto platform, is open 24 hours a day, seven days a week. The exchange has emerged this year as a go-to spot for Wall Street’s weekend warriors. https://t.co/3RFisC8oso
@jords okay this is a real question and i don't intend it to be offensive
but does anyone actually use other another perp dex than Hyperliquid to trade and if so, why?
@PowerPasheur Enfin les termes sont dit (alors qu’en vrai on sait très bien que le seule projet qui mérite de l’attention en ce moment est sur Hyperliquid 👀)
Well, I must to clarify this because some people haven't really understood my take.
I’m not criticizing what @Kinetiq_xyz is building. This kind of outcome has also its place on Hyperliquid, some people are requesting it, and in any case, it definitly wont have a negative impact on its development.
But, the primary goal of HIP-4 is, above all, to enable the emergence of risk markets directly on-chain.
The possibility of arbitrage/hedging his trading positions (which is common in TradFi), is the real innovative feature/added value that makes trading/finance on Hyperliquid even more complete.
Thinking that Hyperliquid will be a game-changer simply because there is the typicall outcomes that we found on prediction markets like @Polymarket and @Kalshi, that the project will gain market share exclusively through this, or that these are the only possible outcomes, is a truly simplistic view.
Imo it clearly not with this kind of outcome that the HIP-4 will be successful.
The goal with hl outcomes will be to hedge his trading positions / arbitrage, exactly as you can do it in TradFI.
I think this kind of bet is reserved for consumer prediction markets, exactly like @Polymarket does so well, where the goal is really to target the average user, through massive marketing/communication campaigns.
I'm not sure that traders on hl want to gamble on events outside the financial sector.
Well, I must to clarify this because some people haven't really understood my take.
I’m not criticizing what @Kinetiq_xyz is building. This kind of outcome has also its place on Hyperliquid, some people are requesting it, and in any case, it definitly wont have a negative impact on its development.
But, the primary goal of HIP-4 is, above all, to enable the emergence of risk markets directly on-chain.
The possibility of arbitrage/hedging his trading positions (which is common in TradFi), is the real innovative feature/added value that makes trading/finance on Hyperliquid even more complete.
Thinking that Hyperliquid will be a game-changer simply because there is the typicall outcomes that we found on prediction markets like @Polymarket and @Kalshi, that the project will gain market share exclusively through this, or that these are the only possible outcomes, is a truly simplistic view.
Imo it clearly not with this kind of outcome that the HIP-4 will be successful.
The goal with hl outcomes will be to hedge his trading positions / arbitrage, exactly as you can do it in TradFI.
I think this kind of bet is reserved for consumer prediction markets, exactly like @Polymarket does so well, where the goal is really to target the average user, through massive marketing/communication campaigns.
I'm not sure that traders on hl want to gamble on events outside the financial sector.
That's not what I'm saying.
My take is that, its not with this kind of outcome, that HIP-4 will truly perform at 100% / inovated the most / enjoy the same success as a consumer prediction markets (maybe I'm wrong sure). Simply because, if we follow what’s done in tradfi, that’s not the kind of solution that’s used.
@Mat_Oracle Definitely and that's obviously good. This is a complete shift from the vision of other projects, which say, “no we won't launch until the product is perfect”, and who always ends up in trouble afterwards
@PowerPasheur Yep why not. And in any case, that just proves that hl is one of the last few places where people are constantly building, with new features coming out all the time.
@0xMerp@tradexyz@Kinetiq_xyz Why not and tbh, it’s still a relatively young ecosystem, but imo, it's still a real important kpi to reach for hl if they want to become a true industry leader
I agree with this take.
But I have a question for you guys and ready to debate of it later (found it interesting)
You don't think that having only 3 or 4 native projects that are actually successful on the revenue/fees/TVL part (like @tradexyz / Unit, @Kinetiq_xyz and @hyperlendx why not) and almost no other token in the entire ecosystem that has really performed (the only one is the KNTQ btw), represents a weakness in the development of the Hyperliquid ecosystem?
Or for you is it the entire opposite, very bullish?
current state of the .hl ecosystem is like 4 verticals, and the investing world is almost a solved game
perps
lending
tradfi perps
staking
HL has perps monopoly, portfolio margin probably also enables lending monopoly
tradeXYZ has monopoly on equity perps (probably no token, just own hype)
Kinetiq has staking monopoly
For memes? i think theres really only one answer. lots of purr holders have nuked their bags, multiple of the top holders are actually basis farming and nonevents regarding supply, im pretty sure that everybody who wanted to sell at shitty prices already sold
if HYPE becomes a top 5 blockchain whats a reasonable valuation for the largest memecoin on hyperliquid? provenance used to be a thing, maybe time is a flat circle
papertrade will garner lots of attention, its novel and will be distributing ownership to users and jez has lots of influence. if ur not already theorizing how to be the first guy to lose money ur already behind
something like altdotfun can seem interesting at first but on second look its like... 97% odds that its just a farm, the barrier to entry to deployment on hypeEVM is rather low, extremely low compared to deploying on hypercore. needs to be kept in mind