Prometheus Pool

[Prometheus Pool @PrometheusPool]

Wondering how you can make #Cardano better? Staying engaged and voting with your delegation is a huge first step!

[Aggelos Kiayias @sol3gga]

1/ This blog post gives some guidelines
regarding engaging with the rewards sharing
scheme used in Cardano. The objective is to help interested
people participate in the mechanism more
constructively for the betterment of the
ecosystem.
https://t.co/vqyy7Vmg4H

[Prometheus Pool @PrometheusPool]

@SawyerMerritt @SpaceX I'm not sure who created this but it's completely unrealistic to expect only 50k people to be watching live

[Prometheus Pool @PrometheusPool]

@phil_uplc Hmm, so is this about having a better interface into what your agents are currently doing? Or is this more about giving each agent a better interface to work? Is it an upgraded interface for orchestration, like the next evolution of @kunchenguid's First Mate?

[Prometheus Pool @PrometheusPool]

@dannyribar 👍

[Prometheus Pool @PrometheusPool]

@phil_uplc

[Torben Poguntke @blocksmithy]

Reading a bridge design tells you what should happen. Watching one execute tells you what it does.

Recorded a walkthrough.

#Bitcoin #Cardano @pogun_io @omerh_

[Prometheus Pool @PrometheusPool]

@blocksmithy @pogun_io @omerh_ This is really cool, looking forward to more videos like this

[Prometheus Pool @PrometheusPool]

@DanoFinance I was curious about your CLMM implementation, is it source available?

Some ideas:
Multi-asset market making, similar to 3pool
Custom liquidity profiles for CLMM
Integration into swap aggregators

[Prometheus Pool @PrometheusPool]

@atlanter @Scalus3 Very cool, always wondering while writing validators whether I'm unknowingly shooting myself in the foot cost wise, or what is getting optimized during compilation to UPLC

[Prometheus Pool @PrometheusPool]

@DanoFinance Is the orderbook an implementation of cardano-swaps, and can you add liquidity directly to the orderbook?

[alphagrowth @alphagrowth1]

Why does the order matter?

Get it backwards: incentives first - and capital arrives, then leaves with the rewards.

We wrote this into PRIME as a design rule:
Fragmentation and efficiency before volume.

That's the difference between durable growth and a subsidy treadmill.

[MilliΞ @llamaonthebrink]

Building anything decentralized in 2026, is an insane uphill battle.

You’re constantly compared to centralized alternatives that are 1000x more well resourced.

You have to work way harder to reproduce a thing that’s easy to do in a centralized way.

The cost is significantly higher. The simplest contract change requires a new round of audits. In a centralized system, that same change is quick overnight tweak to the code running on a local server.

Users don’t appreciate it until it’s too late. And even when they’re reminded why it matters, they forget quickly after cuz they have goldfish memory.

There’s no longer a value premium for doing anything in a decentralized way, and often there’s a discount applied.

It just takes a lot of commitment to stick by decentralization in 2026.

If you’re building something that optimizes for decentralization in this era, you’re in a unique crowd. A minority.

Ppl will crack jokes about you on X. They’ll discourage you. They’ll dismiss you. They’ll say you shouldn’t exist because the centralized options are sufficient.

You need real heart and determination to build for decentralization in 2026.

But if you can weather through it and stay committed, eventually ppl will appreciate what you built.

They’ll be grateful because this industry derives its purpose from the values of decentralization.

Every so often, the crowd returns to it its roots.

And when they do, you’ll gey your recognition.

It ain’t much, but it’s honest work.

[Prometheus Pool @PrometheusPool]

@flubdubster @Cerkoryn @alphagrowth1 Speed is orthogonal to the comparison. Speed is good if you are building for HFT, that's not the only path

[Prometheus Pool @PrometheusPool]

@flubdubster @Cerkoryn @alphagrowth1 Intent based DEX, sounds like placing a limit order or a CIP-118 partial tx, both of which are perfectly suited for an orderbook world

[Prometheus Pool @PrometheusPool]

@flubdubster @Cerkoryn @alphagrowth1 Yes, LP's historically lose money, but there is value in the liquidity they provide, that means there is a market for the service

Local state orders unlock new paradigms, along with the potential to innovate and shift that market to favor both sides more equally

[Prometheus Pool @PrometheusPool]

@flubdubster @Cerkoryn @alphagrowth1 I'm not sure what pure AMM means, or what uniswap moved along means, they seem to still be in the AMM business

Orderbooks operate on a lower level primitive than bonding curves, that gives them more flexibility than AMMs

[Prometheus Pool @PrometheusPool]

@Cerkoryn @flubdubster @alphagrowth1 It's an interesting idea, reminds me a bit of this idea from Sebastien https://t.co/X1T5Isidf1

[Prometheus Pool @PrometheusPool]

@flubdubster @Cerkoryn @alphagrowth1 Building an orderbook doesn't mean you have to do what HL is doing, you lean into different strengths. Instead of trying to support HFT on a chain with 20 second block times, support long term LP strategies that the average user can participate in

[Prometheus Pool @PrometheusPool]

@flubdubster @Cerkoryn @alphagrowth1 Do AMM's need to be fast? You can achieve the same model as an AMM on an orderbook

HFT certainly is one path to profitability, and will never happen on actual decentralized infra

Orderbook grid strategies profit from long term volatility movement in a price range, like CLAMMs

[Prometheus Pool @PrometheusPool]

@flubdubster @Cerkoryn @alphagrowth1 Yes, if you are willing to limit the validator set, require beefy hardware, and require running nodes close enough for 5 ms latency, you can go fast. Not exactly what projects like cardano and ethereum are going for. Doesn't make sense to compete with HL on decentralized infra