Why market EOD drawdown so heavily when it only applies to the evaluation?
Once you’re funded, you’re back to that same predatory intraday drawdown.
If EOD is the selling point, why remove it when traders finally get funded?
$2,000 EOD drawdown.
Daily payouts.
NO consistency rule on funded.
NO daily loss limit.
And we’re launching it at $50 💀
BASE PLAN IS LIVE.
Use code FFF before someone changes their mind 😭🔥
Watch how all “influencers” just started to promote FTMO at one time. Considering their hard breach DLL, this is probably the most predatory rule in futures funding at this day. But if you watch closely, most of your Gurus are not even mentioning this…
@BossMohitt I stopped feeling bad about blown accounts too.
But not because every blow gets me closer.
Because I know beforehand how many failures the math can absorb.
Another firm added to the basket.
This firm is still pretty under the radar, but so far I’ve been genuinely surprised in a good way.
The platform feels clean, the process has been smooth and now the funded account is live.
Payouts coming soon.
Next step: see how they behave when money starts leaving the platform.
Read this a few times until you get the message right...
I think “confidence” is overrated in trading.
I don’t need to feel confident before a trade.
I need to know what happens if I’m wrong.
That’s a much calmer way to trade.
@kingofheartsGU I did the same kind of thing for years.
Protecting the account felt responsible at the time.
Looking back, the time and hesitation cost way more than the account ever did.
Traders are very good at calculating money risk.
Almost nobody calculates time risk.
Spending 4 months protecting a cheap evaluation can be more expensive than losing it in a week.
Time is part of the cost too.
A payout screenshot tells you almost nothing.
I care way more about:
how many accounts it took,
how much was spent,
how long it took,
and what was left after everything.
Gross payout looks good on X.
Net outcome is what actually matters.