๐จPIPSTONE CAPITAL โ WHAT A DISGRACE ๐จ
I've had ENOUGH of @Pipstonecapital
I patiently waited, hoping they would take responsibility and resolve my complaint. But all I got was delayed support, repeated copy-paste responses, contradictory explanations, and a final refusal to reconsider my account breach.
Based on my experience, I consider PipstoneCapital is SCAM. Nothing more to say.
Before purchasing their Instant Pro account, I carefully reviewed the rules. When I couldn't understand their Drawdown Adding restriction, I contacted their AI Support Agent AND a human Discord moderator.
I provided specific trading examples.
Their own moderator explicitly confirmed:
"Yes, this is fine and not a violation."
I trusted that explanation, purchased the account, traded with predefined risk, and made $102.54 profit.
The moment I requested my payout?
โ PAYOUT REJECTED
โ ACCOUNT BREACHED
โ DIFFERENT RULE INTERPRETATION
Then the excuses started.
First, support blamed LOT SIZE.
Later, they blamed ENTRY PRICES.
I repeatedly asked whether their moderator's original explanation was right or wrong.
NOT ONE STRAIGHT ANSWER.
Live chat delays. Unanswered emails. Discord tickets redirected or closed without resolving my actual complaint. The same generic responses repeated again and again.
Finally, they told me breached accounts can NEVER be reinstated because of company policy.
SO WHAT ABOUT YOUR OWN SUPPORT TEAM GIVING INCORRECT GUIDANCE ?
WHO TAKES RESPONSIBILITY ?
Dear Influencers,
STOP BLINDLY PROMOTING COMPANIES WITHOUT QUESTIONING HOW THEY TREAT TRADERS WHEN PAYOUT DISPUTES HAPPEN.
Your followers are trusting your recommendations and spending their hard earned money.
I'm done with the excuses.
I have screenshots of the moderator's statements, AI support conversations, trade history, breach report, payout rejection, and support responses.
@Pipstonecapital โ STOP HIDING BEHIND COPY-PASTE RESPONSES. ANSWER THE ACTUAL QUESTION.
Was your moderator's pre purchase explanation RIGHT or WRONG?
I'm making my evidence public so other traders can judge for themselves.
#PipstoneCapital #PropFirmScam #PropTrading #TradingCommunity
๐จ PIPSTONE CAPITAL | MORE PAYOUT AND KYC COMPLAINTS EMERGING
First, @MAS_AhamedX reported an account breach and payout rejection immediately after requesting a withdrawal.
The reason given was โDrawdown Position Management.โ
Now @samixauusd is raising further concerns after sharing screenshots of his support conversation.
Here's what stands out:
โข Support reportedly confirmed that no trading rule violations were currently showing on his dashboard.
โข In another message, support stated that violations communicated through email could still be considered during payout review.
Another trader has also reported receiving a โKYC Expiredโ status after their first payout, claiming the issue has remained unresolved for five days.
These reports raise some serious questions:
1. If the dashboard shows zero violations, why can previously communicated violations still affect payout approval?
2. Why aren't traders clearly notified of potential violations before requesting payouts?
3. Why are KYC issues reportedly appearing after the first payout?
4. What happens when support cannot resolve these issues for days?
@Pipstonecapital@AirRaja@RajaBanks
You promote a no-payout-denial approach for traders who follow the rules.
Then explain these cases.
Traders shouldn't have to discover potential payout issues only when they try to withdraw their profits.
Clear rules. Visible violations. Transparent payout reviews. That's the minimum traders deserve.
We invite Pipstone Capital to publicly address these reports with specific explanations.
#PipstoneCapital #PayoutRejected #HiddenRules #KYCIssues #TradersDeserveAnswers
Based on public trader reports and shared screenshots. These allegations have not been independently verified. Pipstone Capital's response is awaited.
@samixauusd he is Indian trader something happened with pipstone and he said if payout not received he is involved authorities some kind of sireous situation ๐
Dear CEO of Pipstonecapital, @AirRaja
What's going on your Company. Why Rejecting Payouts and Breaching Accounts without any clear explanation.
I don't know, You Muslim or Not.
But It's 100% Haraam ๐ฎโ๐จ
๐จ FUNDINGPIPS vs EZE FUNDED: LEAKED CHATS RAISE QUESTIONS
โข The leaked chats raise serious questions about @EzeFundedfx alleged involvement in pushing anti-FundingPips content through creators, reportedly offering funded accounts in return.
โข Now @Khldfx is accusing others of coordinated attacks against FundingPips.
โข If these allegations are accurate, this goes beyond normal competition. Traders deserve transparency, not behind-the-scenes promotional campaigns disguised as independent opinions.
Let the evidence speak.
@Khldfx@fundingpips
Someone stood up for me in a private chat and called me brother. That is your "family member caught" ๐๐ A screenshot of a man defending a friend.
Six days ago it was a Device ID. Now it is somebody else's WhatsApp ๐คฃ The case against #21138050 gets thinner every time you post.
Still no overlap โ
Still no trades โ
Still not one dollar ever paid to me by FundingPips โ
Rent free? ๐ I paid you five challenge fees. You kept the payout. One of us is living off the other and it is not me.
๐จ SCAMPIPS CASE #0005 ๐จ
India. FundingPips paid this trader twice. Then $2,000 came due and he became a "CID breach".
๐ค Trader: A*** K., Tamil Nadu, India
๐ฐ Three $10K accounts: two Phase 2, one Master. ALL THREE TERMINATED.
๐ธ $2,000 in accumulated rewards, gone.
โ Previous payouts from FundingPips: $716.77 and $1,647.16. Paid. Reviewed. Approved.
๐ Aug 13, 2026
๐ซ Appeal ticket #2152053. Denied. "Final."
Read the order of events. Two payouts cleared by FundingPips' own risk desk. Same trader, same MacBook, same setup, same device. Then a $2,000 reward builds up on the Master account, and suddenly that same device "matches another registered user".
๐จ THE DEVICE DID NOT CHANGE. THE AMOUNT DID. ๐จ
He asked for the evidence. Ticket #2152053. The "Responsible Trading Team" did an "additional review" and kept the original decision. What did they show him? Nothing. What account did he match? Nobody. What trades overlapped? None listed.
Instead he got the full template:
โ "Shared device or system access across multiple accounts"
โ "Coordinated or connected trading activity"
โ "Third-party involvement"
โ "Any other practice inconsistent with independent account operation"
Four accusations. Zero names. Zero logs. That last line, "any other practice", is the one that should scare every trader. It means they do not need a rule. They need a payout date.
Then the cleanup:
๐ Removed from the FundingPips Discord
๐ Blocked from buying another account
๐ โน35,000 of challenge fees, three accounts, two passed phases, one Master. Kept.
And here is the part that should end the "Pakistan problem" story for good. This man is from Tamil Nadu. His appeal says, in his own words, "I am not trying to damage FundingPips' reputation. I simply want a fair opportunity to have my case reviewed."
That is who they are closing. Not hedgers. Not groups. A polite trader on his own laptop who had already been paid twice and asked nicely for the evidence.
๐ต๐ฐ Pakistan. ๐ฒ๐ฆ Morocco. ๐ณ๐ฌ Nigeria. ๐ช๐น Case 3. ๐ฎ๐ณ India, twice now.
Same email. Same "may indicate". Same missing proof. Same timing: right before the money.
FundingPips does not have a cheating problem. FundingPips has a payout problem, and "CID" is how they solve it.
@FundingPips, ticket #2152053. Name the account he matched. Show the overlap. Or pay the $2,000 you already approved him for twice before.
๐ https://t.co/gM6T0dGo3v. Case #0005 on the record. Submissions open.
๐ซ STAY AWAY FROM FUNDINGPIPS ๐ซ
@Pipstonecapital I request my payout after 2 more profitable days they give me in written so don't apply any hidden rules you don't mention in front of purchase account rules understand
I urge @LAntonioAF to seriously look into this payout request.
I am exhausted having tried support, discord and email and to no avail no one is helping or even looking into why I havenโt been paid.
I have seen people request and be paid after me-some within few hours
Why me?
EZEFUNDED CEO WAQAS AHMAD EXPOSED ๐
After his YouTube channel got taken down, @waqasgof started blaming FundingPips CEO @khldfx for copyright strikes.
Bro, seriously? Why would Khalid even bother with you?
But hereโs whatโs actually interesting.
Waqas runs a prop firm called EZE Funded, and behind the scenes, heโs allegedly paying small creators and offering them funded accounts to make videos targeting @fundingpips
And this isnโt just speculation. Hereโs a leaked chat from an EZE Support moderator asking a creator to upload videos like this by tomorrow.
The same person who acts like a genuine voice for the trading community in front of his audience is apparently running a completely different playbook behind the scenes.
Pay creators, hand out funded accounts, push content against competitors, and then act innocent in public?
What a joke. ๐
The screenshots speak for themselves. Decide who youโre actually dealing with.
Dear CEO of Pipstonecapital, @AirRaja
What's going on your Company. Why Rejecting Payouts and Breaching Accounts without any clear explanation.
I don't know, You Muslim or Not.
But It's 100% Haraam ๐ฎโ๐จ
Hello @FundedTraderMarkets @Ye_FTM@FTMPerps , I need an urgent explanation regarding my $5K 2-Step Plus account.
My account has been marked as BREACHED, even though my dashboard shows a positive balance of $5,014.63 and only $14.63 in profit.
This is serious condition you take stand for you do it i think profpirm industry should like this type of treatment. I saw 10+ post daily do it bro ๐ค
What is your Thoughts guy's?
Ban propfirms in india?
๐จ BIGGEST PROP FIRM SCAM? HIDDEN RULES TRADERS NEED TO KNOW!
A breakdown of strict prop firm conditions, including a 120 second rule with no exceptions, even when a stop loss is hit. The video also highlights payout rejection concerns.
Have you ever faced unexpected rules after buying a challenge?
#PropFirmRules #PayoutDenied #PropFirmNews #PropTrading #PropFirmShinob
๐จ PIPSTONE CAPITAL, THIS IS COMPLETELY UNACCEPTABLE ๐
I bought your 5K Instant Pro account, traded, managed my risk, made $105.87 profit, completed KYC and requested my $102.54 payout.
Once, I clicked REQUEST PAYOUT, my account was immediately Breached and Payout was Rejected.
I opened my first NAS100 sell position with 0.10 lots. Later, the market swept the 5min highs gave SMT confirmation. So, I entered a second sell position with another 0.10 lots.
I placed SL on both positions, with a combined risk of approximately $45, keeping it below the 1% floating loss limit.
After around one minute, I closed the second position for a small profit of +$3.69 and allowed my first position to run with its original $45 SL. Unfortunately, the SL was hit, resulting in a loss of -$45.52
I accepted the loss and waited for the next opportunity on Gold.
Gold was consolidating, with equal lows below acting as my target. I identified the setup and entered 0.1 sell position. After checking SL, I noticed that the risk was only around $22, which was below my planned risk for this setup. Therefore, I decided to add another 0.05 lot sell position less than 30 seconds after opening the initial 0.10lot sell position.
Approximately one hour later, both TP targets were successfully hit, generating profits of +$98.40 and +$49.30.
After that, I successfully completed my KYC verification and submitted a payout request of $102.54 from my Instant Pro account.
However, the moment I clicked "Request Payout", I immediately received an email stating that my account had been Breached. My payout history also showed "Payout Rejected"
I was shocked and immediately checked the reason behind this decision. ๐ค
The reason provided was "Drawdown Position Management"
I carefully reviewed all the account rules before purchasing this challenge, but I couldn't find this restriction clearly mentioned anywhere. I have experience trading with several other prop firms, and this is honestly the first time I've encountered such a rule.
The Rule they Mentioned :
"A buy may not be opened below the lowest entry of the buys still open on the same instrument, and a sell may not be opened above the highest entry of the sells still open. The first such trade breaches the account, whatever its lot size."
Why was this rule not clearly disclosed before purchase? Why was my account breached immediately upon requesting a payout?
Even worse, my account appears to have been breached automatically the moment I requested a payout, without a proper manual review.
I've attached screenshots and trading history as evidence to support my case. I sincerely request @Pipstonecapital to review the entire situation and provide a proper explanation.