HIS, PHD

Professor, now Writer/Producer.
As the Jewish People go, so goes Civilization.
I proved Reuters is a propaganda mill (link ↙️).

[HIS, PHD @PropagandaBuff]

How to build a global Islamist-dominated media empire (Reuters) seeking the destruction of the only Jewish State and the United States of America:

1) Promote to the position of Senior Foreign Policy and White House correspondent, a Turkish Islamist-supporting woman named after Muhammad’s six-year-old bride (Humeyra Pamuk).

2) Retain as your lead writer in the Middle East, a British Muslim convert and proven liar (Tom Perry).

3) Publish glowing eulogies for Hamas mass murderers written by your Global Foreign Policy Editor (Samia Nakhoul).

4) Hire as your Deputy Gulf (Qatar) Bureau Chief, a former professor who developed the Anti-American, Antisemitic curriculum at Northwestern University’s Qatar-based journalism school (Andrew Mills).

5) Appoint a Palestinian as Bureau Chief in Israel’s Capital (Rami Ayyub).

6) Feature a Palestinian correspondent who hails from a clan that tried and failed to eradicate Israel in the 1948 War (Ali Sawafta).

7) Permit another Palestinian correspondent covering the Gaza War to publish Israeli troop movements relayed via social media (Nidal al-Mughrabi).

8) Staff your Jerusalem Bureau with radical-Left token Israeli Jews who hate their country (Maayan Lubell, Allyn Fisher-Ilan).

9) Assign a Washington-based reporter to cover riots, harassment and violence targeting Jewish students at scores of universities across the U.S. and blame it on "Israel's war in Gaza" (Kanishka Singh).

10) Refuse to report in your financial statements, the specific countries in the Middle East in which you generate revenue and income.

@thomsonreuters
@Reuters

[HIS, PHD @PropagandaBuff]

@o_sheilagh @jonsac The good British people should ask for a refund. But they are far too polite!

[HIS, PHD @PropagandaBuff]

Here are the Islamists at Reuters trying to throw Americans off the scent of Abdul El-Sayed as a supporter of the Muslim Brotherhood:

"Rogers has alleged without evidence that El-Sayed has ties to the Muslim Brotherhood, one of the Arab world's oldest and most influential Islamist groups."

So, let's review. Shortly after the Freedom and Justice Party (Muslim Brotherhood) took power in Egypt following the revolution staged in 2011, their leader and new Egyptian president, Mohamed Morsi, expanded his executive powers, announced he was going to "purge" the Egyptian media and police, and suggested the government might kill Egypt's peace treaty with Israel.

An Arabic-language petition in support of the "revolutionary decisions taken by the president" was published on the Egyptian site Al-Ahram Gate and signed by 46 people described as leaders of the Egyptian community in the U.S. Abdul El-Sayed being one of them:

“We, leaders of the Egyptian community, support the revolutionary decisions taken by the president, and we call on him to purge the media and the police as quickly as possible.”

There are also verified posts by El-Sayed's half-sister about his mother being an activist for the Muslim Brotherhood in the 1970s.

Is El-Sayed a card-carrying member of the Muslim Brotherhood? We don't know for sure, at the moment. But his support for the Islamist group's political extremism is documented and not likely a hallmark the vast majority of Michiganders want to see in their Senator.

Unless you're an Islamist, or a Reuters correspondent. But I'm being redundant.

[HIS, PHD @PropagandaBuff]

Has this dude apologized yet?

[HIS, PHD @PropagandaBuff]

Much has already been written in righteous response to Obama's ignorant and hateful diatribe in Belfast targeting the Jewish People of Israel. I add three observations to the factual record:

1) Under the Ottoman Empire, 90% of agricultural land in Palestine was classified as "Miri", State land not owned by any individual -- Jew, Gentile, or Muslim. Palestinian Arabs did not hold title. Much of it remains public land in Israel today. At the same time, hundreds of thousands of acres of agricultural land, desert and wasteland, malarial swamps, were sold at extortionate prices to Jews and Jewish land funds like the JNF. None of this land was "taken" from Palestinian Arabs.

2) When Obama kicked off his Middle East tour in Egypt in 2009, he similarly apologized for Israel's existence with reference solely to the Holocaust and the need for a Jewish refuge. Not a word, then or now, about 3,000 years of Jewish history, blood, toil, and nation-building in the land, nor Jewish indigenous rights as recognized in international law in the 1920s -- twenty years before the Holocaust.

3) Obama is an extremely well-educated and articulate former American president. His use of the adolescent gutter term "taken off" to describe how Israel came to hold the land was not only false, but deliberately crude and intended to evoke Antisemitic tropes at a time when Jews are being hunted and murdered for their religious and national identity.

Obama's speech betrayed what many of us long suspected: he is a flag bearer for those seeking to once again marginalize and dispossess the oldest extant indigenous People in the Middle East.

If, on the other hand, and as many Jews referred to him while in office, Obama is truly a "mensch", he should do the right thing: issue a correction, retract his provably false claims, and apologize.

[HIS, PHD @PropagandaBuff]

Phil Gordon once worked for Bill Clinton, a classically liberal president who did everything in his power to forge a Palestinian State (see below) with an Israel willing to make extraordinary concessions, e.g., cede its indigenous heartland and 3,000-year-old capital, in exchange for the promise of peace.

Clinton was a liberal but also a realist, able to learn from experience. He blamed Yasser Arafat for the failure of negotiations and understood that Hamas, elected by the Palestinians in 2006, wanted only to murder Jews.

Clinton also came to understand that once forfeit, a Palestinian State would no longer be possible to achieve.

Gordon, on the other hand, is that particular brand of idiot, so absorbed in his own fantasies of power and process, he believes a Democrat administration, with him in it of course, can coerce a reality which ignores history and dismisses the intrinsic Palestinian ambition to eliminate Israel.

Or maybe he just doesn't worry much about body counts of Israelis and Palestinians.

[Hussain Abdul-Hussain @hahussain]

Former Biden officials, hopeful for a comeback to the White House in 2028, are declaring that there is no difference between Netanyahu and other Israelis, or their different voters. All Israelis are immoral and America should force morality on them.

The puzzling part is that these same officials said we should leave Saddam, Assad, Islamic Iran alone, Houthis, Hamas, Hezbollah alone, even lift sanctions because they hurt people only and never the regimes. Only Israel should be compelled.

And they don’t see the antisemitism behind it.

The morality lesson in the op-ed:
“They are expressions of opposition to Israeli actions that Americans increasingly see not just in geopolitical but also moral terms.”

[HIS, PHD @PropagandaBuff]

"Barack Obama blamed Donald Trump's 'series of bad decisions,' including an 'unnecessary war,' for rising costs at a Cleveland rally for Democrats Sherrod Brown and Amy Acton."

Rising costs? Unnecessary? Like the hideous Obama Center that was supposed to cost $300 million and ended up costing $1 billion, with half of that sucked from Illinois and Chicago taxpayers?

[HIS, PHD @PropagandaBuff]

@78tiger @AFP @LAPressClub And, they get 150 million euros from the French government every year to defame Israel. Quite a gig.

[HIS, PHD @PropagandaBuff]

"How did a photographer from Agence France-Presse (AFP), one of the world’s largest news agencies, capture a gunman in the middle of a terrorist attack near Judea Junction?"

The same way Palestinian photographers working for Reuters, the largest news agency in the world, were among the first to cross the Gaza border when Hamas invaded on October 7th.

They knew, in advance.

https://t.co/4Pq5ivt3Dp

[Israel War Room @IsraelWarRoom]

🚨 COINCIDENCE? How did a photographer from Agence France-Presse (AFP), one of the world’s largest news agencies, capture a gunman in the middle of a terrorist attack near Judea Junction?

According to Israeli reports, the IDF is investigating whether the photographer had advance knowledge of the attack.

Was it extraordinary timing, or did someone know what was coming?
-@ynetnews

[HIS, PHD @PropagandaBuff]

1. Israel is the farthest thing from an "apartheid" State. 20% of the population is Arab; they enjoy full rights and have a standard of living higher than that seen in most Arab countries. Nearly all of the 22 Arab States are institutionally racist and de facto apartheid States.

2. Jews have every right in international law to live in Judea & Samaria ("West Bank"), see San Remo Resolution (1920), Palestine Mandate (1922), American-British Palestine Mandate Convention (1924), Articles 75-80 of the UN Charter (1945), UNSCR 242 (1967), Oslo Accords (1993).

3. Thousands of Palestinian Arabs are employed by Israeli companies operating in both Israel and J&S. They directly suffer from boycotts.

4. By virtue of their decision to boycott Israeli products and not Chinese, Russian, Turkish, or Iranian products, these creeps are demonstrating they are racist, ignorant hypocrites.

[Heidi Bachram @HeidiBachram]

I was shopping in Brighton and antizionists tried to stop me buying Israeli goods from Waitrose. They said I’d be “racist” to buy them. I asked if it was xenophobic to boycott a whole nation. They had no answers. So I bought LOADS of Israeli products and they were NOT happy.

[HIS, PHD @PropagandaBuff]

@Ranger22421 In my profile.

https://t.co/SdgibmxanS

Cheers!

[HIS, PHD @PropagandaBuff]

Palestinian reporters and otherwise Islamist writers and editors working for Reuters and trained in the far-Left media giant's unscrupulous propaganda methods cram so many insidious rhetorical devices into a single article, engage in so many ethical violations of Reuters own journalism handbook in an effort to dupe readers, I am now employing Grok to identify and tally all of them.

Here's Grok summarizing Reuters' artful deceptions in just a single story on the upcoming Israeli elections, edited by their Jerusalem Bureau Chief, Palestinian Rami Ayyub and British Muslim convert Tom Perry:

Propaganda techniques (≈14–16 instances):

Card stacking / omissions (multiple clustered instances): Emphasis on Palestinian living conditions in Gaza (“mainly in tents or damaged buildings”), “rapid expansion” of settlements, settler attacks, and government “turned a blind eye,” while omitting or minimizing Oct. 7 atrocities and remaining hostages in detail, historical Palestinian rejection of prior offers, security rationales for Israeli control and presence in disputed territory, comparative Israeli civilian impacts, or fuller context on why both candidates prioritize security control. The lead frames policies that “have hampered a decades-old peace process” without equivalent Palestinian agency or rejectionism.

Asymmetrical definition / loaded language (≈6–8): Repeated “occupied West Bank,” “occupied Palestinian land,” “territory Israel captured in a 1967 war,” and “a practice nearly all countries consider illegal under international law, although Israel disputes this.” These present a contested legal/political status (Israel rejects the applicability of certain occupation-law transfer prohibitions and views the territory as disputed) in near-consensus framing. Additional loaded phrasing includes “hampered,” “rapid expansion,” and “repudiates the ‘two-state solution.’”

Assertion / innuendo (≈3–4): “policies that have hampered a decades-old peace process”; “In a sign of how far Israeli politics has shifted to the right”; presentation of critics’ “blind eye” claim without balanced counter-context.

Pity / atrocity-adjacent framing (≈2–3): Gaza population description and settler-violence emphasis evoke suffering without parallel scale or context for the other side.

Logical fallacies (≈5 instances):

Appeal to pity (≈2–3): Gaza tent/damaged-building description and implications of settlement/settler impacts.

Appeal to authority (≈1–2): “Nearly all countries consider illegal under international law” as near-definitive, with Israel’s dispute secondary.

Causal / post-hoc elements (≈1): Attribution of peace-process stagnation primarily to Israeli policies.

Reuters Handbook / Trust Principles violations (≈9–11 instances):

Always strive for balance and freedom from bias; take no side / tell all sides (overarching and multiple specific): Title, lead, and structure center Israeli policies as the variable affecting Palestinians rather than mutual dynamics; selective emphasis on Palestinian grievances and international consensus language over equivalent security, historical, or rejectionist context. Both candidates’ shared opposition to a Palestinian state is framed as a rightward repudiation of generations of negotiations.

Loaded expressions (≈4–5): “Occupied,” “hampered,” “rapid expansion,” “blind eye,” “repudiates.”

Guard against putting opinion in a news story (≈2): Judgmental framing such as “how far Israeli politics has shifted to the right” and “effectively repudiates.”

Social responsibility / completeness of facts (≈1–2): Incomplete picture via the omissions noted above.
Allegations not portrayed as fact: International-law consensus language is strong relative to the acknowledged Israeli dispute.

Totals: Approximately 28–32 discrete reporting/ethical failures across the categories (propaganda ≈14–16, fallacies ≈5, Handbook ≈9–11).

Reuters: All propaganda, all the time.

[HIS, PHD @PropagandaBuff]

It's in my 2011 peer-reviewed paper. Nothing has changed, except some of the names pumping out the propaganda at Reuters.

Anyone can now use Grok to identify the fallacies and ethical reporting violations in any 'news' story from Reuters, the NYT, WaPo, the BBC, by entering the URL of the story and asking Grok to analyze based on the research.

Try it!

@elonmusk

[cbcwatcher @cbcwatcher]

CBC deliberately inverted the story

They opened with: “Israel has closed off the West Bank after Israeli soldiers shot and killed two Palestinians near Hebron.”

The actual sequence—that two armed men from Hebron drove up, got out of the car, and opened fire on the checkpoint, triggering a 20-minute gun battle in which the attackers were killed—was buried nearly two and a half minutes in. Only then did viewers learn about the large quantity of weapons and ammunition, Israeli officials saying the pair were planning a major attack on civilians, and Hamas praising the “high-impact operation” while calling for more violence.

BBC, CNN, The Washington Post, and The Times of Israel all led with the attack itself. CBC chose not to.

This is not neutral sequencing. Leading with the Israeli response while delaying the fact that the dead men initiated a terrorist attack is a classic framing choice that makes the aggressors look like victims—days before Israel’s election @brodiefenlon

[HIS, PHD @PropagandaBuff]

Since the October 2025 truce in Gaza, at least $800 million to $1.2+ billion has been officially paid out to the Palestinians by European and Canadian governments. This doesn't include money funneled to Hamas and other Palestinian terrorist groups by NGOs and fake charities.

Keep in mind, the above figure is CASH; it doesn't include indirect payments for humanitarian supplies, e.g., food aid, shelter materials, medicines, fuel, etc., which are tallied separately.

Here are the biggest donors:

European Commission’s Humanitarian Aid department (ECHO): ~$178 million
Sweden: ~$90 million
Canada: ~$84.5 million
Netherlands: ~$64 million
Germany: ~$43 million
United Kingdom: ~$36 million
Italy: ~$28 million
Switzerland: ~$27 million
Norway: ~$25 million
France: ~$25 million
Belgium: ~$16 million

OCHA’s Financial Tracking Service (FTS) totals for the full-year 2025 include:

ECHO ~$272 million, Sweden ~$80 million, Germany ~$65 million, Canada ~$63 million, Netherlands ~$64 million, UK ~$52 million, Norway ~$62 million.

And this is where it's going ⬇️

[StandWithUs @StandWithUs]

Report: Israeli intelligence shared with the US that terror group Hamas has no plans to disarm, has rebuilt its tunnel system, restored its pre-October 7, 2023, force levels of 30,000 to 40,000 terrorists, and has reimposed full governance over Gaza.

And now Hamas has made its intentions explicit.

Last week, Hamas officials met with the UN humanitarian coordinator in Gaza - and used the meeting to deliver a direct threat to Israel: they are prepared to carry out another October 7, 2023-style attack, inside Israel, in the West Bank/Judea and Samaria, and abroad, wherever an opportunity arises. Israeli officials described the warning as “unusually explicit and severe.”

While the world pressures Israel to make concessions - Hamas is rebuilding, rearming, and promising to do it again.

[HIS, PHD @PropagandaBuff]

@Osint613 Whenever Iran seeks to ward off U.S. or Israeli military action with bluster, they will always turn to their trusted mouthpiece -- Reuters.

[HIS, PHD @PropagandaBuff]

@XaraInSpring Can't recall the last time I saw a Catholic nun holding an M16.

[HIS, PHD @PropagandaBuff]

In his daily propaganda report on Gaza, Reuters Palestinian correspondent Nidal al-Mughrabi no longer bothers to differentiate between combatant and civilian casualties. When terrorists are killed, they're just "people".

Here's another "people" recently eliminated.

[Open Source Intel @Osint613]

Palestinian media in Gaza released a martyrdom tribute video glorifying Jamila al-Shanti eliminated in an Israeli airstrike in Gaza.

I wouldn’t be surprised if she was considered a civilian casualty.

[HIS, PHD @PropagandaBuff]

@_ki_backup @Osint613 @Reuters @GovMikeHuckabee @RoKhanna Hard to tell, there are so many of them!

[HIS, PHD @PropagandaBuff]

@Osint613 Reuters: "students protesting a lack of ceiling fans in classrooms".