ProperTeaLady

Property is my passion. Investor in residential sectional title in SA. Here to share ideas and learn from others Also love my tea :)

[Michael Jordaan @MichaelJordaan]

One of those “once you see it, you can’t unsee it” ideas. Super useful for understanding school, sports, careers, or health stats.

[ProperTeaLady @ProperTeaLady]

Is there an assumption that with Iran at war that @MYANC may find funding to run an election somewhat difficult to come by? @PaulivW @BizNewsCOM ?

[Matt Shumer @mattshumer_]

https://t.co/ivXRKXJvQg

[ProperTeaLady @ProperTeaLady]

@mwamwa_lish @naledimashishi Now you’re getting it…

[Tahmineh Dehbozorgi @DeTahmineh]

The Western liberal media is ignoring the Iranian uprising because explaining it would force an admission it is desperate to avoid: the Iranian people are rebelling against Islam itself, and that fact shatters the moral framework through which these institutions understand the world.

Ideally, to cover an uprising is not just to show crowds and slogans. It requires answering a basic question: why are people risking death? In Iran, the answer is simple and unavoidable. The people are rising up because the Islamic Republic of Iran has spent decades suffocating every aspect of life—speech, work, family, art, women, and economic survival—under a clerical system that treats liberty as a crime. There is no way to tell that story without confronting the nature of the regime.

Western media refuses to do so because it has fundamentally misunderstood Islam. Or worse, it has chosen not to understand it.

Islam, in Western progressive discourse, has been racialized. It is treated not as a belief system or a political ideology, but as a stand-in for race or ethnicity. Criticizing Islam is framed as an attack on “brown people,” Arabs, or “the Middle East,” as if Islam were a skin color rather than a doctrine.

This confusion is rooted in historical illiteracy. Western liberal media routinely collapses entire civilizations into a single stereotype: “all Middle Easterners are Arabs,” “all Arabs are Muslim,” and “all Muslims are a monolithic, oppressed identity group by white European colonizers.” Iranians disappear entirely in this framework. Their language, history, and culture—Persian, not Arab; ancient, not colonial; distinct, not interchangeable—are erased.

By treating Islam as a racial identity rather than an ideology, Western media strips millions of people of their ability to reject it. Iranian protesters become unintelligible. Their rebellion cannot be processed without breaking the rule that Islam must not be criticized. So instead of listening to Iranians, the media speaks over them—or ignores them entirely.

There is another reason the Iranian uprising is so threatening to Western media is economic issues.

As you know, Iran is not only a religious dictatorship. It is a centrally controlled, state-dominated economy where markets are strangled, private enterprise is criminalized or co-opted, and economic survival depends on proximity to political power. Decades of price controls, subsidies, nationalization, and bureaucratic micromanagement have obliterated the middle class and entrenched corruption as the only functional system. The result is not equality or justice. It is poverty, stagnation, and dependence on government’s dark void of empty promises.

Covering Iran honestly would require acknowledging that these policies are harmful. They have been tried. They have failed. Catastrophically.

This is deeply inconvenient for Western media institutions that routinely promote expansive state control, centralized economic planning, and technocratic governance as morally enlightened alternatives to liberal capitalism. Iran demonstrates where such systems lead when insulated from accountability and enforced by ideology. It shows that when the state controls livelihoods, non-conformity becomes existentially dangerous. That lesson cannot be acknowledged without undermining the moral authority of those who advocate similar ideas in softer language.

Western liberal media prefers not to hear this. Acknowledging it would require abandoning the lazy moral categories that dominate modern discourse: oppressor and oppressed, colonizer and colonized, white and non-white. Iranian protesters do not fit. They show that authoritarianism is not a Western invention imposed from outside, but something many societies are actively trying to escape.

That is what terrifies Western liberal media. And that is why the Iranian people are being ignored.

So the silence continues.

[ProperTeaLady @ProperTeaLady]

@KateEmerson88 It’s always the same people. It’s not racism if it’s always the same people

[ProperTeaLady @ProperTeaLady]

@MelbourneBlokee A true hero!

[ProperTeaLady @ProperTeaLady]

@CyrilRamaphosa What a complete and utter bell end

[ProperTeaLady @ProperTeaLady]

@insiderugbymark ❤️

[ProperTeaLady @ProperTeaLady]

@scrumming_ten Don’t start with this. Humility goes a long way

[ProperTeaLady @ProperTeaLady]

Again @Airbnb @airbnbSA have stopped my payments for no reason. It’s the same account I’ve used with them for 3 years yet every 3-6 months they stop may payments and sit on MY money until I jump through hoops. I don’t understand how this is legal? @bchesky

[ProperTeaLady @ProperTeaLady]

I think @Airbnb is up there with one of the most corrupt businesses on planet earth. Every 6 months they make you jump through a million hoops to update your kyc while they withhold all your payments. They must make billions a year on interest they earn while illegally holding your money.

[ProperTeaLady @ProperTeaLady]

@realMaalouf A dry BJ doesn’t seem great

[ProperTeaLady @ProperTeaLady]

“The 1% Rule: What It Means + When It’s Useless”
🧵 The 1% Rule in real estate:
What it is, how to use it, and when to ignore it.
Let’s break it down 👇
What is it?
The 1% Rule = The monthly rent should be at least 1% of the property price.
🔹 Example:
Buy a $200,000 house → Rent should be $2,000/month.

Why it exists:
It’s a quick filter.
If a property doesn’t hit 1%, it often won’t cash flow (but not always).
When it’s useful:

Screening deals fast
Targeting high-cash-flow areas

Comparing multiple deals side-by-side
When it’s useless:
In high-price markets (NYC, LA, London)

When interest rates are high

If repair costs or taxes are crazy

Better tools to use:
✅ Cash-on-Cash Return
✅ Net Operating Income
✅ Actual monthly cash flow

✅ TL;DR:
Use the 1% Rule as a filter.
But run the real numbers before you buy.

Follow me for more simple, honest real estate tips.

[ProperTeaLady @ProperTeaLady]

@nbcsnl Can’t help but welling up when seeing Farley and norm. ❤️❤️

[ProperTeaLady @ProperTeaLady]

@JDVanceNewsX 👍🏻

[ProperTeaLady @ProperTeaLady]

@News24 Lol

[ProperTeaLady @ProperTeaLady]

@NewYorker Jesus H Christ are you kidding me!?!?

[ProperTeaLady @ProperTeaLady]

@realdogeusa Why do farts smell worse in the bath?

[Dame Claire C 🇬🇧 TR 🇬🇧 @MrsCR1ghtW1ng]

Dear @GBNEWS
I am the mother of a 25 year old daughter who was raped at 13 by 2 illegal immigrants in our town. She still has mental health issues, and will never forget her ordeal. We had to be moved from our area for safety. It's a very long story...