solana:6GmAFSYs4gk3FDao5FzzySQpPZaWsa4rUJHacpMpUNgx is severely undervalued here
Dev is actively shipping and tourists seem to have left.
Remember frens, solid tech projects don't go up in a straight line. There's usually a shakeout before it accelerates.
Updates:
1. Working on migrating to LaunchLab, this would solve for snipers on new pairs, increase volume, and incentivize more deployers. It would mean cheaper deploys, fully permissionless and traditional bonding curves which people are used to.
This would overall help to increase volume across new token deployments. While benefiting $STONK and our ecosystem from the ecosystem flywheel.
2. We are looking into ways to handle distributions on-chain, which would reduce centralization risks, such as through a Merkle Distributor.
3. Working on UI improvements to the site overall and mobile.
4. New listings are coming, been working with Sunrise directly to get new assets listed. Such as $LLY coming tmr
5. Solving for further improvements around Standard tokens to incentivize deployments outside of just rewards.
We believe StonkFun has brought something truly unique to Solana, coins paired with anything.
We are the only platform that offers it, and it is very difficult for other platforms to compete.
StonkFun also handled the integration into terminals for custom quotes, routing and more.
Memecoins / Paired with anything.
$FRONG is actually worth paying close attention to, because it is currently the "cleanest mechanism and best example of the flywheel effect in action" on Pools. The trading itself is strengthening the token's underlying structure, rather than relying purely on narrative or team-driven momentum.
Pools is the official memecoin launchpad launched by Uniswap Labs on Robinhood Chain. FRONG is one of the early test tokens created by Uniswap product designers using the Pools test contract before the official launch.
The core mechanism of TradePools: 0.25% of trading fees are automatically reinvested and locked as liquidity, and 0.05% creator fees are used for buybacks and burns. The higher the trading volume, the deeper the liquidity and the stronger the structure.
The teaser video before Pools launched was actually named "frong.mp4," featuring a frog, uploaded by Zack Labadie. Combined with the fact that Uniswap's official account has also posted frog-related content multiple times, the lore alignment is quite strong.
Later, Uniswap founder Hayden Adams publicly stated: "We didn't expect the tokens created during testing to be discovered," and confirmed that they have waived all creator fees for test tokens including FRONG, switching to an automatic buyback-and-burn mechanism instead.
Furthermore, both the Pools launchpad and FRONG have a clear flywheel mechanism.
The core flywheel of the Pools launchpad itself: trading generates 0.25% fees, most of which are automatically reinvested back into the permanently locked liquidity pool. Deeper liquidity โ lower slippage and better trading experience, attracting more trading volume โ back to step one.
FRONG has an additional flywheel on top: because FRONG is a test-phase token, Uniswap later waived all creator fees and changed it to: all fees are used for buybacks and burns.
So FRONG now has a double flywheel: (Pools general mechanism) liquidity-deepening flywheel + deflationary flywheel (more trading โ more buybacks and burns).
The higher the cumulative trading volume, the more locked liquidity increases and the larger the buyback/burn amount. For example, at $200M in trading volume, a rough estimate would be ~$500K in liquidity deepening + ~$100K in buybacks and burns.
Additionally, my initial understanding of FRONGโthat it brings attention to Poolsโremains unchanged.
this is exactly what I mean with the solana:9cRCn9rGT8V2imeM2BaKs13yhMEais3ruM3rPvTGpump flywheel
Ansem posted $Manlet again in his discord. $Manlet went from around 4m to an 8m+ wick, then right after, an $Ansem candle from 202m to 215m
$Manlet is paired with $Ansem on stonkfun. every trade on the native 4% pool generates fees, and 85% of those fees are paid out to $Manlet holders in $Ansem
$177k has already been paid out in Ansem to Manlet holders
so the flow is simple:
> Ansem posts $Manlet
> $Manlet pumps + volume goes up
> the pool generates fees
> fees are converted/paid out in $Ansem
> recurring buy pressure on $Ansem
> the rewards become more valuable
> holding and trading $Manlet becomes more attractive
> more volume is created and the loop starts again
the reason this structure is so powerful is that $Ansem has an actual front figure. most memecoins have to constantly manufacture new narratives to stay relevant. $Ansem has Ansem at the center, and he already has one of the biggest attention funnels in crypto
every post, call and new beta can become another catalyst for the entire ecosystem, even when he isnโt directly bullposting $Ansem
> when Ansem bullposts $Ansem, you get one wave of buying
> when Ansem bullposts $Manlet, you can get two: the beta gets bought first, then the volume and fee flow come back into $Ansem
this is also why $Manlet is good for the $Ansem token. it isnโt competing with Ansem, itโs turning attention and speculative volume around Ansem into demand for the core asset
more Manlet volume = more Ansem distributed
higher Ansem price = more valuable Manlet rewards
more valuable rewards = more reason to hold and trade Manlet
now imagine $Manlet isnโt the only one
4-5+ active Ansem betas, all doing volume and all routing rewards back into $Ansem
the individual betas can come and go, but $Ansem remains at the center and absorbs activity from all of them = multiple fee streams
$Manlet is just the first proof of the flywheel