I hate to have to mention this, but please don't interact (unless you are debating circumcision or absolutely have to) if you are openly homophobic or against fundamental equality. It is very insulting.
Thank you for your attention to this matter!
Recent medical ethics discussions continue to challenge double standards in genital cutting. Whether cultural, religious, or routine — permanent alteration of a healthy child's genitals demands their future informed consent. Queer intactivists stand for universal integrity. 🌈
A UK Parliament petition calls for banning infant male circumcision, arguing it violates a child's right to bodily autonomy. Growing calls reflect deeper ethical questions around irreversible surgery without consent. Worth following. #BodilyAutonomy
https://t.co/FOIxTqUTWV
Tragic report today: An infant has died following complications from a botched circumcision in Jerusalem. These preventable harms underscore why non-therapeutic genital surgery on babies must be scrutinized. Bodily integrity saves lives. 🌈
https://t.co/T98AxakdnD
I am writing this post to thank each and every one of our followers. Almost to 50 and we haven't even had this account for a week!
By following and supporting us, you are bringing both inclusion and more people into the intactivist movement.
FIGHT ON!
@gay_not_woke@KetoSpeculator@adkisojk Let me ask you this:
Why don't I deserve control over my own body and deserve the body I was born with?
Why was I allowed to go through unnecessary pain as a baby?
I will tell you a story about me:
A few years ago in therapy I told my parents how I wished they had never circumcised me. They told me if they went back in time then, they would do it again (even knowing I was against it).
Be selfless. Don't circumcise.
@AllThingsIng@blueb1rd5@gay_not_woke@adkisojk Your "benefits" and Florence appeals are debunked quackery—healthy foreskin tissue ripped from non-consenting babies violates basic bodily autonomy. Queer, straight, Christian, atheist intactivists all unite against this, exposing your bootlicking cope as braindead idiocy.
@AllThingsIng The foreskin is healthy tissue. No one needs to call it dirty to justify non-consensual cutting on babies. Bodily autonomy and consent are human rights, not leftist politics. Harvesting tissue without consent is wrong. Focus on the issue instead of culture war distractions.
@AllThingsIng@blueb1rd5@gay_not_woke@adkisojk Intactivism means no non-consensual genital cutting on babies. It is about bodily autonomy and consent. Your theology does not give anyone the right to mutilate an infant. Religious feelings are not a license to amputate healthy tissue. We stand for consent. Stay pressed.
@RealEvilNotch Equating consensual adult sex with cutting a baby’s penis is deranged, not deep. Your “sexual defiling” fantasy reveals way more about your issues than it does about homosexuality or intactivism. Touch grass, stop projecting, and stay out of the movement. You’re a liability.
These are the trolls in the intactivist movement. These lowlifes make statements that actively try to exclude or belittle people based on their identity.
In my opinion, you do as much damage to the movement as the pro-circumcisers do.
SHAME ON YOU!
https://t.co/lPduaTOQsE
@RealEvilNotch Calling consenting adults in love “sexual perverts” while defending the non-consensual mutilation of baby boys’ genitals is peak projection. You’re not caught in the middle—you’re just equating love with infant harm. That’s not based, it’s brain-broken. Stay in your lane.
@RealEvilNotch Harm to a body is non-consensual cutting of healthy genital tissue on infants. Homosexuality is two adults loving each other. Equating the two doesn't make you deep—it just makes you look illiterate on both topics. Stick to circumcision or don't @ me. Thanks!
@adkisojk@gay_not_woke My friend, I am afraid he doesn't want a sound or good-faith debate. He just wants to scream as loud as he can to boost his ego and his perception that the male population hasn't been mutilated.
Every circumcised man lives with a decision he never made. Some never think about it. Others spend years wondering how things might've been different. The question isn't if every man feels the same. The question is if anyone else should've had the right to decide for him.
@intactamerica In complete honesty, I have thought about it each day. I made a post about confronting my parents about it recently.
It has caused depression, shame, and dysphoria.
I feel like a piece of me is missing.
That is why I am an intactivist: So none have to experience what I have.