ScR3W th3 SySt3m

[𝐁𝐢𝐟𝐟 @Biffdon]

I'm just really happy that the UFOs and Aliens waited until we had really good drone tech, really good hologram tech, really good AI, and really good actual tech so we know for sure everything they tell us is legit.

[MJTruthUltra @MJTruthUltra]

Dude… he literally transformed on camera. lol

A. AI
B. Shapeshifter
C. Totally normal for a head to reshape itself

[Holy Bible @Holy__Bible1]

God is Good❤️

[michelle (on break!) @michelleakin]

this made me feel insane

[𝐁𝐢𝐟𝐟 @Biffdon]

No way would a guy already suspected of being a time traveler and the exact person who Biff Tannen was based on in the exact part of the films where it says this...make this exact "mistake" almost 30 years later.

[Brock Riddick @BrockRiddickIFB]

YOU believe that moon landings are not possible because of the Van Allen radiation belts.

I believe that the moon landings are not possible because the moon is not a floating space rock.

We are NOT the same.

[𝐁𝐢𝐟𝐟 @Biffdon]

Satanic witch John Todd explains the requirement for being a witch in the music industry and mentions how you can't cast a spell on a Christian, but you can trick them into doing it themselves.

[ScR3W th3 SySt3m @QSH0T1st]

@QuantumAlteredX He will never forget that moment

[Happy Punch @HappyPunch]

This is WILD 🤯

Russian wrestler hit a flying squirrel down 3 points AT THE BUZZER for the win 😱

[ScR3W th3 SySt3m @QSH0T1st]

@BrockRiddickIFB I see no porpoise of this

[Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡ @shanaka86]

JUST IN: Meta sold 7 million Ray-Ban smart glasses in 2025 alone.

Workers in Kenya are watching the footage.

Not metadata. Not anonymized clips. The actual videos. People undressing. People in bathrooms. People having sex. Bank cards. Medical documents.

The blurring is supposed to protect privacy. It fails constantly. The contractors see everything.

Here is the part that should stop you cold: You did not buy the glasses. You did not agree to the terms of service. You did not consent to anything. But if someone wearing Meta glasses walks into your bedroom, your bathroom, your doctor's office, your home, a contractor on the other side of the world may be watching you right now.

The person wearing the glasses consented. Everyone else in the room did not.

Meta's defense is that this is all disclosed in the privacy policy. They are technically correct. Buried in language so dense that 99% of users never read it. And even if they did, it would not matter, because the terms govern the wearer's data. Not yours. You are not a party to the contract. You are the product being annotated.

Millions of AI-enabled cameras walking around in public. Recording constantly. Uploading to servers. Reviewed by humans earning a few dollars an hour to label your most intimate moments so the algorithm gets smarter.

This is not a bug. This is the business model.

The EU is already asking questions. MEPs submitted formal inquiries to the Commission this week demanding answers on GDPR compliance. The problem is obvious: European data protection law requires consent from data subjects. Bystanders are data subjects. Bystanders never consented. The entire architecture violates the regulation by design.

Meta's response has been silence and a reference to terms of service that do not apply to the people actually being filmed.

Google Glass died because people called the wearers "Glassholes" and banned them from bars. Meta solved the social problem by making the glasses look normal. They did not solve the privacy problem. They hid it.

Seven million units sold in 2025. The installed base is accelerating. Every unit is a potential surveillance node operated by someone who may not understand what they are feeding into the system and reviewed by contractors who see everything the algorithm cannot process.

The question is not whether this becomes a scandal. The question is whether the scandal arrives before or after the glasses are on 50 million faces.

Watch the EU. If Brussels moves on GDPR enforcement, Meta faces a choice: disable human review in Europe and cripple the AI training pipeline, or accept fines that could reach billions. Neither outcome is priced into the stock.

The glasses are selling faster than ever.

The contractors keep watching.

And somewhere right now, someone you have never met is looking at footage of you that you never knew existed.

[ScR3W th3 SySt3m @QSH0T1st]

@QuantumAlteredX Wasted energy.

[RNC Research @RNCResearch]

During his deposition regarding his relationship with pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, Bill Clinton says he’s NEVER lied under oath.

Q: “Have you ever lied while under oath?”

CLINTON: “No.”

Clinton was impeached for lying under oath about having an affair with an intern.

[Brandon Harnish @PaleoGOP]

@Indy_reporter_ @JNBortka

[ScR3W th3 SySt3m @QSH0T1st]

@QuantumAlteredX I just told my wife this

[ScR3W th3 SySt3m @QSH0T1st]

@TedLogan1010 Great camera work

[Star S.⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ @DominguezH31015]

Bill Clinton is smiling while looking back through old Epstein photos & nodding over memories🤣

His attorney snatches them out of Bill’s hands.

[ScR3W th3 SySt3m @QSH0T1st]

@QuantumAlteredX Who had the balls to actually film that? 😆

[LIZ CROKIN @LizCrokin]

Breaking Video: Triggered Hillary Clinton Flips Out Over Questions About Pizzagate!

Rep. Lauren Boebert asked Hillary Clinton about Pizzagate in the Congressional deposition about Jeffrey Epstein. Boebert specifically asked about Comet Ping Pong, the Podesta E-mails and mentions how pizza code is found both in Jeffrey Epstein’s and John Podesta’s e-mails.

Hillary gives the same tired talking points claiming Pizzagate is an “outrageous allegation” pushed by “Qanon”. Remember Pizzagate broke in October of 2016 when Wikileaks released the Podesta E-mails dump which was more than a full year before Q’s first post.

Boebert then pressed Hillary on the “Life Insurance” file on Anthony Weiner’s laptop. Hillary and her team of lawyers get triggered and go off the record.

Never forget the official Inspector General report by Michael Horowitz cited that the Weiner laptop contained evidence implicating Hillary & the Clinton Foundation of crimes against children.