Quantum 🌊 SWASH NEWS

[Quantum 🌊 SWASH NEWS @QSwashNews]

signing every transaction with NIST-grade post-quantum crypto (ML-DSA-87 + ML-KEM-1024) 🔐

[QFAN Qore 🛡️ @x_fan149]

Most chains are still saying

“We’ll deal with quantum later.”

QoreChain has been live since June 7, 2026

signing every transaction with NIST-grade post-quantum crypto (ML-DSA-87 + ML-KEM-1024) 🔐

One chain. Three VMs.

EVM + CosmWasm + SVM running together ⚡

AI-optimized consensus that actually tunes itself 🧠

Security gates first — no rushed launches 🛡️

Not waiting for the future.
Building it today.

@QoreChain | $QOR

[Liviu Epure @epure_liviu]

One more interesting space i’ll attend, speaking for @QoreChain . Set your reminders!

Thank you @clawchatglobal for the invitation

[QoreChain @QoreChain]

Switching wallet apps does NOT fix a compromised seed phrase.

Every account derived from those same 12 or 24 words remains exposed, even if the addresses look different.

A real migration requires fresh entropy, a completely new seed and moving every asset over.

@Isallkun explains why seed-phrase portability is powerful, but unforgiving.

[QoreChain @QoreChain]

🚨 Today you’ll learn why blockchains can’t just flip a “quantum-safe” switch.

Classical signature: ~64 bytes
ML-DSA-87 signature: 4,627 bytes

That’s roughly 72× more data. Now multiply it by every transaction in every block.

QoreChain planned for that from genesis.

[QoreChain @QoreChain]

Changing a blockchain’s signature system touches wallets, validators, exchanges, custody providers and every account that may need to move.

The cryptography already exists.

The hard part - coordinating the migration without leaving users or infrastructure.

[QoreChain @QoreChain]

Ethereum just put post-quantum security on the public roadmap.

Weekly interoperability tests.
A post-quantum key registry.
Signature-verification precompiles.
Eventually, post-quantum validator signatures.

Strong signal: migration is becoming an active engineering problem. 🧵👇

[QoreChain @QoreChain]

NEW SPACE: TRUST, BUT VERIFY 🔎

“Secure”
“Quantum-safe”
“Audited”

Three claims. Where’s the proof?

@joinFIO @HoudiniSwap @cellframenet + 7 more!

What should users be able to verify themselves & how do we separate working security from impressive-sounding marketing?

[MEXC Alpha @Alpha_MEXC]

MEXC New Kickstarter!

‣ $QOR @QoreChain
‣ Deposits: Opened
‣ Trading: Aug 20, 2026, 13:00 (UTC)

Join now 👉
https://t.co/Dx8JIWNSYC

[QoreChain @QoreChain]

A quick “quantum-safe” BS detector 🔍

Ask five questions:

1. Which algorithm?
2. Which standard?
3. Where is it enforced?
4. Which transactions are exempt?
5. What happens to existing accounts?

If the answers end at “available” or “on the roadmap,” keep asking.

✅ QoreChain’s answer: ML-DSA-87 under NIST FIPS 204, with mandatory signing on the native lane and mandatory authorization for EVM activity.

What would you add to the checklist?

[Quantum 🌊 SWASH NEWS @QSwashNews]

@x_fan149 @MSBIntel ✅

[QFAN Qore 🛡️ @x_fan149]

@MSBIntel Yes, these things need to move beyond mere claims and become proven realities; a mere claim cannot withstand a quantum threat.

QoreChain doesn't just claim this—it has actually built the first fully comprehensive, quantum-protected Layer 1.

[Quantum 🌊 SWASH NEWS @QSwashNews]

@x_fan149 @Algorand @QoreChain 🛡️

[QFAN Qore 🛡️ @x_fan149]

@Algorand Yes, these things need to move beyond mere claims and become proven realities; a mere claim cannot withstand a quantum threat.

QoreChain doesn't just claim this—it has actually built the first fully comprehensive, quantum-protected Layer 1. @QoreChain

[Quantum 🌊 SWASH NEWS @QSwashNews]

@x_fan149 @Cointelegraph 🛡️

[QFAN Qore 🛡️ @x_fan149]

The World's First Fully Post-Quantum Blockchain Transfer

• Historic Milestone: On July 2, 2026, a transfer of 1,000 QOR tokens was executed on the QoreChain mainnet (qorechain-vladi).

• Why Is This a First? While many other blockchain projects have merely included quantum security in their roadmaps or tested it in isolated components—such as wallet signatures—QoreChain completely bypassed classical cryptography for this transfer, simultaneously employing all NIST-approved post-quantum algorithms in an end-to-end manner.

[QoreChain TÜRKİYE 🇹🇷 @QoreChaintr]

@EliBenSasson The advanced standards Starknet aims to reach are already a reality on QoreChain. The future of secure multi-chain architecture is already live! ⚡️

[Quantum 🌊 SWASH NEWS @QSwashNews]

QoreChain has been live since June 7, 2026

[QFAN Qore 🛡️ @x_fan149]

Most chains are still saying

“We’ll deal with quantum later.”

QoreChain has been live since June 7, 2026

signing every transaction with NIST-grade post-quantum crypto (ML-DSA-87 + ML-KEM-1024) 🔐

One chain. Three VMs.

EVM + CosmWasm + SVM running together ⚡

AI-optimized consensus that actually tunes itself 🧠

Security gates first — no rushed launches 🛡️

Not waiting for the future.
Building it today.

@QoreChain | $QOR

[Liviu Epure @epure_liviu]

The note points at the right thing, but the control is running at the wrong frequency. Human review happens per transaction. The credential was handed over once, in a single message, and that one event is the one nobody reviews.

The asymmetry is in the undo. A scoped token can be killed on its own and nothing else breaks. A card number that has sat in a chat log can only be revoked by reissuing the card, which takes down every standing mandate the holder has, subscriptions, tolls, utilities. That is why people put it off, and why the exposure outlives the order by years.

Review the grant, not the purchases.

[Liviu Epure @epure_liviu]

Don’t forget to tune in today at 15:00 UTC

I’m speaking for @QoreChain

[Liviu Epure @epure_liviu]

"Quantum resistant" is not a property of a chain. It is a property of a layer, and there are at least four of them.

Ethereum's roadmap lists them one by one. KZG commitments: pairing-based, due for replacement. BLS validator signatures: pairing-based, replacement is leanXMSS. Account signatures: still secp256k1, the plan is EIP-8141. STARK commitments: hash-based, nothing to do.

The part that gets read backwards: the layer that is already hash-based is the one an attacker has no reason to touch. Forging a proof rewrites state. Forging one account signature moves that account's coins, and every proof afterwards is honest.

Three of those four layers get replaced by a fork. The fourth is a key the protocol does not hold.