QUTIS closed. It was led by Prof. Enrique Solano @KikeSolanoPhys, who keeps on as Ikerbasque Professor at University of the Basque Country, Bilbao, Spain
Will send to your email, send it please via DM. In fact, one of the many following steps to even enhance this result more is combining our tools with those @ParityQC So let Magdalena and Wolfgang know asap, I mean if they want that I share the billion dollar markets with them 😉
Our dear friend & brilliant researcher @xichen_bilbao is key asset in quantum for Spain, Europe, China & worldwide. We are proud to have him as group leader @QUTIS3 center @upvehu with @qmisanz & @JorgeCasanovaM2 Xi also boosts collaboration with our @artist_qu center in Shanghai
Like in good suspense stories, I could not stop reading this fascinating article @nytimes@CadeMetz telling the winding paths of an intellectual community of free thinkers in the Silicon Valley, led by a pseudonymous protected and mysterious psychiatrist https://t.co/Ijg3EXYwat
@gppcarleo Exactly, it is not adding qubits to square lattices & nearest-neighbor coupling. There, a smart classical mapping may create eternal draw. Quantum computers may turn useful now if we go beyond digital mapping of problems on qubits & use creative architecture geometries/topologies
@KikeSolanoPhys Agreed...! I was referring to some debates I have seen in the context of digital simulation stating we should "just add a few qubits" in the experiment to be "quantum supreme again", but it's clear that it is not going to be enough if you don't improve fidelities as well, etc...
I disagree with the "overlooked" statement, it is valid only for unimaginative NISQ architectures. If we accept "useless" quantum supremacy as valid in Classical vs. Quantum debate, almost any quantum experiment outperforms classical computers since long. Examples abound in labs.
This is core to co-design principles. A co-design classical computer beats co-design quantum computer, until the latter makes a leap forward and so on. Evidently, Co-Design Quantum Computers will have last word. Let us keep working together for it @meetIQM @GoogleAI@IBMResearch
Metaphysics on Physics & Business
(1) There is no cosmological curse on humans calling a problem Useless, 100 qubits suffice, or Useful, millions of qubits needed.
(2) Remove spell: go beyond digital mapping of problems on qubits & square lattices with nearest-neighbor couplings.
@KikeSolanoPhys@Harvard This paper has some evidence but ours is a much deeper study on the topic arriving a similar conclusion with a evolutionary study looking at coherence of ancestors : https://t.co/pJoe8vKybA 1/2
In QUEBS 2010 @Harvard@A_Aspuru_Guzik, I claimed in a panel that existence of a quantum model matching observed biological effects is not a proof of quantumness. It is mandatory to prove no classical model suffice. This paper makes quantumness unnecessary https://t.co/EiKVMIemer
Deep topic in quantum models & analog quantum simulations. Are chaos & physical properties (Schrödinger, Heisenberg, interaction) representation dependent? See https://t.co/cV61ALXPhv work of the great @ihdeutsch If so, what about digital and digital-analog quantum simulations?
We open theater curtains: tensor network model, from Beijing, in classical computers overcome Google's quantum supremacy claim https://t.co/ctreGJ9e63 It looks like a credible result up to verification. Welcome healthy discussions and competition @GoogleAI@IBMResearch @meetIQM
Danke Andreas! Was uns in Europa vor allem stark macht ist der kollaborative Ansatz. Mit IQM versuchen wir die Stärken von Forschungseinrichtungen, Startups und Industrie zu vereinen. Der Kuchen ist riesig, die Herausforderungen aber auch. Lasst uns das weiter gemeinsam angehen!
"Dass Merkel und ihre Kolleginnen die Bedeutung einer Exzellenz bei Quantencomputing betonen, freut Jan Goetz, den Mitgründer des deutsch-finnischen Start-ups IQM." #MIGFonds Unternehmen wie @meetIQM bringen #Digitalisierung in Europa entscheidend voran.
https://t.co/MF53aFoLIY