Love <--> Freedom <--> Choice
0^0=1+0
If 0=no-thingness
If 1=thingness
1/0=can't be done
undefined,
not allowed
Love, (0)
Love^Love=
Everything AND No-thing
No homunculous
No infinite regression
Love is being reborn.
Quantum 💓
@caitoz Free thinkers listen to all sides and act accordingly. No one posseses Truth wholy. Truth is discerned and revealed through action as a result of an open society being informed. Manipulators do not love; they push an ideal agenda that is not in the interest of all. Resolve.
@PyramidRealm No. I say that is normal.
Law is idea helping civil society ; ideas don't protect you from physical reality. Then you have to protect you (or not). Then, when do 'you' exist and who protects 'you' when you can't?
@MrSethLundquist @MrHiggles@AndrewYang Who's worried? Good luck to you. I just think it's another silly idea. If you're going to have a CC, then the odds and the state legs are lining up more for a Balanced Budget Amendment long before a "Democracy Dollar" Amendment. Get real.
@MrSethLundquist @MrHiggles@AndrewYang BTW, the revenue from advertising for the debates would pay for all broadcasting and probably offset the $1 for voting so no out of pocket for anyone. Imagine. Free Speech; Free Market; Free elections; but i'm sure the Dems would balk at that. Imagine (but without OPM).
@MrSethLundquist @MrHiggles@AndrewYang And he wants to change The Constitution to do this. That takes 2/3 of state legs in a Constitutional Convention and ratified by 3/4 (38) Sate Legs. Good luck with that 'imagineering'.
@MrSethLundquist @MrHiggles@AndrewYang (Spew) your disinfo. I don't hate poor people. I help poor people directly by giving directly without go'mint help. Do you? Our system made us the strongest. Taxing to give away for Yang to get a chance is the oldest trick. I say take $ out of politics but SCOTUS = "Free" Speech!
@AT2055 @APCentralRegion @AP Skillet? Into the frying pan: Dark Humor. Sorry. Chicago is weird. Smollet is weird. Karma is a record store. One like laughs and Debbie Downer takes its way too seriously.
@MrHiggles @MrSethLundquist @AndrewYang Oh, from my thinker. Of course it comes from ... go'mint, i mean taxpayers. So he wants taxpayers to pay 100/person/yr (330m × 100 = 33 Billon per year) to offset donors so he doesn't have to ask and so he can have 'equal' footing. I just wanted him to say it. OP(iu)M