Qubex Protocol represents a paradigm shift in digital asset infrastructure, delivering the world’s first entreprise grade quantum-resistant blockchain solution
1/6 BREAKING NEWS:
We have just completed the first #ICP transaction with hybrid post-quantum cryptography!
Wallet: Dilithium + ECDSA
status : confirmed
The game is changing 👇🏼
🇵🇹 Project Spotlight: Qubex Protocol
At the #WCHL25 National Round, @QubexProtocol is tackling the next frontier: privacy for digital assets, built on top of a proven quantum-safe foundation.
Here’s how they’re pushing boundaries 👇🧵
• IBM Quantum Loon (2025)
• IBM Quantum Kookaburra (2026)
• IBM Quantum Cockatoo (2027)
These innovations will lead to the realization of the Starling system in 2029.
https://t.co/mM13COCZrG
#IBM launches Quantum Loon, their processor designed to test the qLDPC architecture.
This processor is crucial for their plan to reach 1 million qubits by 2030.
Warning, they expect 2029!
For context: 13 million qubits = Bitcoin broken in 24 hours
#Quantum
#Microsoft says quantum technology is only five years away, #Amazon showcases its error-correction processor
Meanwhile, researchers warn that #quantum computers capable of breaking #Bitcoin could arrive as early as 2027.
What do you think?
1/6 BREAKING NEWS:
We have just completed the first #ICP transaction with hybrid post-quantum cryptography!
Wallet: Dilithium + ECDSA
status : confirmed
The game is changing 👇🏼
@TraderTrev_TT It's hard to explain these concepts, which are too mystified.
Yes, it adds weight to a transaction, and we use compression, which works very well;
Classic = 64bytes approx., sphincs + 27kb...
But that's the price of security?
@TraderTrev_TT It’s a big challenge because this reveals several critical issues that must be considered during the transition period cross-chain compatibility,performance and economic impact, migration timeline complexity, network infrastructure dependencies..
@TraderTrev_TT Our hybrid strict policy enforces if !classical_valid || !quantum_valid { return Err() } - this
implies we require both signatures to be valid, even though from an external perspective we may
appear to only have one signature for compatibility purposes.
@better_holland@michaelwgm@dfinity I can understand your questions, we are competing at the WCHL and have won the first stage.
We use official algorithms, and in fact we have successfully issued a transaction on one of our hybrid wallets. Time will tell
BlackRock has added a warning to its Bitcoin ETF (IBIT): quantum computing poses a significant risk to the long-term security of Bitcoin.
BlackRock. Not just some random person on X.
They manage $10 trillion, and THEY are concerned.
#Bitcoin#ICP#BLACKROCK#ETFs#Crypto