🌾Quellwasser🌸

[🌾Quellwasser🌸 @Quellwasser_G]

“成为一个天真的理想主义者很容易。成为一个愤世嫉俗的现实主义者很容易。不抱任何幻想并仍然保持内心的火焰是另一回事。”

—— 玛丽·路易丝·冯·弗朗茨

🩵🤍🩷🩵🤍🩷🩵🤍🩷🩵

[Jim Stewartson, Decelerationist 🇨🇦🇺🇦🇺🇸 @jimstewartson]

I shot this documentary a month after the insurrection to warn that QAnon was a Russian psyop that nearly resulted in America’s suicide on J6—and that if we didn’t stop them, they would do it again.

We didn’t, so they did.
Working on a follow up.

[Dave Troy @davetroy]

1/Evidence is mounting that Musk believes he is a messianic figure who is also aligned with Putin’s Noosphere policy agenda. He wore this idiotic “Omega point” pendant to the UFC fight. Bots on Here and other proxy outlets are amplifying it.

[Congressman Robert Garcia @RepRobertGarcia]

RFK Jr. has no medical or scientific credentials and wants to gut the National Institutes of Health. And Marjorie Taylor Greene today cheered him on in our committee. This is outrageous and shameful.

[Denys Shtilierman @DenShtilierman]

After 990 days of 🇷🇺 war crimes:

SWIFT is not disabled;

🇷🇺 ports are not closed;

Landlease didn't start;

🇷🇺 goods are traded;

Most of the 🇷🇺"elite" are not under sanctions;

#russia continues to be illegally in the UN!
#unrussiaun

[Alex Cole @acnewsitics]

Women over 65 remember what it was like before Roe v. Wade became the law of the land. That's why they are voting for Kamala.

[Denys Shtilierman @DenShtilierman]

Garry Kasparov wrote a very important article about the US election and his support for Kamala Harris: "The United States Cannot Descend Into Authoritarianism". And I completely agree with it.

Those who read my channel know very well my attitude towards Democrats in general and Harris in particular. I consider them impotent and cowards incapable of decisive action. And under almost any other Republican candidate, I would have advocated voting for him. But now America has completely different stakes, because the choice is between Democrats and traitors to their country, who are no strangers to Russian and Chinese money, who defend the interests of the "Axis of Evil" and who are ready to leave all their allies to be torn apart. Garry Kimowich raises this tough question with his article and I'm sure will provide an answer for many people as to why Trump is the end of the America as we knew it.

I recommend that anyone and everyone read the article in its entirety. But as is old tradition, I'll write out the key points:

"Facing imminent arrest, I was forced into exile and have lived in New York since 2013. I never thought I would need to warn Americans about the dangers of dictatorship."

"Donald Trump has been breaking down the guardrails of American democracy for nearly a decade now."

"As Ronald Reagan famously said, freedom is “never more than one generation away from extinction.”"

"Trump hasn’t even won the election yet—and his victory is far from assured—but we are already seeing signs of preemptive obedience that should look familiar to many refugees from repressive regimes like me. Both the Washington Post and Los Angeles Times canceled endorsements of Vice President Kamala Harris earlier this month at the behest of their owners, a de facto silencing of two major national newspapers. It should come as no surprise that business owners are careful to avoid upsetting someone who has frequently called for his detractors to be locked up, or in the case of Liz Cheney, have guns “trained on her face.”" - On Cheney, I think clarification is needed. Trump has called Cheney a "stupid person" and a "very dumb individual." In comments on an interview with former Fox host Tucker Carlson on Thursday night, Trump suggested: "Let's put her with a rifle standing there with nine barrels shooting at her." Naturally, those words, coupled with Trump's reputation, were taken as a threat.

"This election is a choice between a candidate who has vowed to fight for America’s institutions, and one who is deeply dangerous—a candidate who I believe will bring total mayhem and destruction to this country."

"While the situation at home certainly raises concerns, the geopolitical landscape is disastrous; the worst I have seen in my living memory. America’s prestige abroad is disintegrating. No wonder, then, that Trump’s hate-filled rhetoric is finding purchase."

"It wasn’t Harris’ job to put her ideas into practice. And while she initially hewed closer to the administration’s stance, she has since stepped out from her boss’s shadow, making clear in interviews and on the campaign trail that she will not just follow in Biden’s footsteps. The policy proposals she is offering, whether you agree with them or not, are her own."

"Biden has spent many of his 40 years in government during a time when the threat of nuclear war was high, and that experience has undoubtedly informed his approach to foreign policy as president. Harris, on the other hand, doesn’t carry the same Cold War baggage, and has said that she would not allow Ukraine to succumb to Russian aggression. I don’t believe her administration would continue the Biden administration’s policies of betrayal when it comes to Ukraine—and Trump and Vance have obviously made no secret of their plans to essentially give in to Putin’s desire to swallow Ukraine."

"This election is bigger than policy, as the long list of prominent Republicans who are willing to stand up and support Harris demonstrates. Former Vice President Dick Cheney and his daughter, Liz; former California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger; former Sen. Jeff Flake; several members of Trump’s own administration, including some of the most senior."

"Legally, we have a choice in this election, but morally, the answer is clear: If we want to preserve America’s institutions and its standing on the world stage, we must elect Kamala Harris on November 5."

"Kamala Harris’ election is the only way to preserve democracy, at home and abroad. She may not be the best choice. But on November 5, she is the only one."

#election #HarrisWalz #Trump

@KamalaHarris @realDonaldTrump @Kasparov63

[Alex Chen @AlexChe31659937]

在美国如果问谁是当前全美国最准的民调，所有人的共识是爱荷华州的Ann Selzer。这家民调应该绝大多数人都没听说过，是因为它只做爱荷华州的民调，在全国影响很有限，但是在美国政治研究圈子却被奉为圭臬，其原因不光是其民调结果历史奇准，更重要的在于，它经常公布让人大跌眼镜的民调结果，与其他民调有很大出入，结果一再证明它是对的，其他只要和它不一样的民调肯定就是错的。
就在Selzer公布民调的那一刻，Polymarket菠菜盘上川普赔率开始跳水，现在是川普：贺锦丽=56%：44%。
今年的民调公司由于此前在2016和2020年两次低估川普，导致今年如果再出现看起来低估川普的结果，他们会倾向于要么不公布重新抽样，要么通过调整权重的手段把民调结果调到看起来合理，等于变相误导川普支持者以为遥遥领先，并且刺激贺锦丽支持者加倍扫票。
2020年ABC雇佣的民调公司出过威斯康辛州拜登+17%，结果拜登+0.7%的洋相，沦为大家的笑柄，该民调公司直接被ABC解约基本断送职业生涯，砸了自己的招牌，教训不可谓不惨痛。今年的民调公司们优先避免自己看起来很离谱，而不是对民意做出准确的调查，其参考性大大下降。在这种情况下Sezler能公布如此让人大跌眼镜的结果，勇气非常可贵，因为它赌上了自己的金字招牌。
今年其他民调过多的采用加权特别是根据2020年大选的结果加权，比如在威斯康辛州，他们把今年样本通过加权调到2020年的大选比例。而Selzer是加权最少的民调，在2016年之后几乎所有民调都加权，只有Selzer没有，结果它得出了最准确的结果。这说明Selzer的抽样方法技高一筹，能够直接通过抽样得到符合选民分布的样本，不用太多的事后加权。
仔细看Selzer民调的细节，其反应的趋势为
1，白人左转；
2，女性大幅左转；
3，老年人大幅左转；
4，注册共和党选民左转；
5，男女性别两极化增加，男性更支持共和党，女性更支持民主党；
6，本科以上白人大幅左转；
7，中间选民大规模倒向贺锦丽；
我严重怀疑大量共和党人说一套做一套，都在偷偷投票贺锦丽表达Never Trump。
目前就算川普赢了北卡NC，乔治亚GA，亚利桑那AZ，内华达NV四个摇摆战场州，也会以1票之差输掉选举人票，270：268。

[Yue Millward is on bluesky @YueMillward]

🚨川普正在重新定義「愛」的意義🚨
喬治·奧威爾在《1984》一書中提出了「新話」（Newspeak）的概念‼️這是專制政府通過修改語言來控制人民思想的手段，將諸如「戰爭即和平」、「自由即奴役」之類的矛盾詞語視作社會價值的表達。

現實中的獨裁政權，例如納粹德國和蘇聯，在宣傳上也使用了類似的策略。納粹德國利用「愛國」和「榮譽」來掩蓋戰爭暴行，並以「最終解決方案」（Final Solution）這樣的模糊詞來掩蓋大屠殺的真實目的。

而在蘇聯，斯大林時期的「清洗」被稱為「糾正錯誤」或「保護國家利益」，用以掩蓋對異見者的殘酷鎮壓。

在中共的統治中，重新定義了「革命」和「批鬥」的意義。當時，「革命」不僅意味著社會進步和解放，而是指清除黨內「走資派」和「反革命」的行為，並通過大規模的公開羞辱和殘酷的「批鬥」來迫害異見者。

將「計劃生育」的概念竄改為「強制墮胎」和「強制節育」。

2000年代提出的「和諧社會」概念，表面上宣揚的是一種社會穩定和經濟繁榮的理想。然而，在實踐中，這個詞被用來形容鎮壓異議和控制社會的行動。政府對於新聞審查、異議人士的拘禁和網絡監控等行為，都是在「和諧」的旗幟下進行的，與其表面上的「和諧」完全相反……

除了《1984》對獨裁者普遍使用的「語言操控」（Language Manipulation）手段有詳細描述以外👇
阿道司·赫胥黎（Aldous Huxley）的《美麗新世界》（Brave New World）
這本小說中，也詳細描繪了，一個反烏托邦社會，其中政府通過操控語言和情感來控制公眾。例如，社會上對「幸福」的定義完全由政府來決定，人們的自由意志和個人情感被壓制，而「愛」的概念被弱化或改變成服從和消費的工具。

雷·布萊伯利（Ray Bradbury）的《華氏451度》（Fahrenheit 451）
在這本小說中，獨裁政府摧毀了所有被認為是危險或反叛的書籍，並重新定義了「知識」的概念。書中的政府使用宣傳機器來重新詮釋真相，將「焚書的火焰」從破壞象徵轉變為「清潔」象徵，並讓人們相信焚書是「保護社會」的正當行為。

奧威爾的《動物農場》（Animal Farm）
書中，豬掌控的獨裁政府通過篡改口號和規則來控制動物。例如，原本的七誡「所有動物都是平等的」被逐漸竄改為「所有動物都是平等的，但有些動物比其他動物更平等」。這種篡改語言和歷史的方式強調了極權統治如何通過操控語言來鞏固權力。

瑪格麗特·阿特伍德（Margaret Atwood）的《使女的故事》（The Handmaid’s Tale）
在小說中，極權政府吉利德（Gilead）控制了女性的生活和身體，並重新定義了「愛」、「婚姻」和「生育」的概念。這個社會使用宗教話語來合理化壓迫，並通過重新詮釋語言來達到思想控制的目的。

當獨裁者開始扭曲和竄改語言的定義時，你該意識到，他們正打算：

❗️限制思想和言論自由❗️

❗️ 美化壓迫和掩蓋暴力行為❗️

❗️ 操縱大眾的情感和態度❗️

❗️ 重新定義「真理」❗️

當你發現語言的定義被不斷扭曲和重新定義時，你應該保持警惕，質疑背後的動機，並尋求獨立和多元的信息來源來保證自己不被誤導。這是抵抗語言控制、保護思想自由的關鍵一步‼️

[Denys Shtilierman @DenShtilierman]

On this day, October 24, 1945, the UN Charter was officially signed, a document created under the close supervision of the NKVD.

Thanks to Russia's illegal occupation of the seat of the Soviet Union, an abundance of agents and corruption, the UN has now effectively lost any power whatsoever. Perhaps it is even for the best, because otherwise Guterres could shamelessly support his Moscow masters in the war with Ukraine. Other Kremlin agents, including the first UN Secretary General Alger Hiss, have already acted in a similar fashion.

Alger Hiss, as an NKVD agent in the American delegation, played a key role in the outcome of the crucial negotiations at the Yalta Conference. There is ample evidence of U.S. Secretary of State Stettinius directing discussion of key issues to Hiss: “China - talk to Hiss about it. Far East - talk to Hiss about it.” Thus, on behalf of the United States at Yalta, an NKVD agent was acting in many ways. As a result, half of Europe came under totalitarian control of the USSR, and Stalin, who was in an extremely weak position, was not forced to make a single democratic reform. Instead of creating a body that would respect the rule of law, the Security Council was invented, a structure that allowed the USSR to block any decision. The chief architect of such a UN system was Alger Hiss.

After the war and the creation of the UN, Hiss did not stop his work and facilitated the forced repatriation of nearly two million people who had fled the Stalinist regime (Operation Keelhaul). When Joseph Crew, acting U.S. Secretary of State, learned that an agreement had been signed to return Soviet citizens who were in the West, he was shocked to realize that people were being sent to certain death. Crew immediately sent a telegram with orders to stop the process, but it was “lost.” Alger Hiss was responsible for its disappearance, the second time he condemned millions of people to death, torture and gulags.

Thus, the current weakness of the UN, which has effectively become a branch of the FSB, may be beneficial. But it is important to remember that under other conditions Western civilization could have ended the Russian Empire long ago with the help of the United Nations. Russia could have been denuclearized, de-imperialized and demilitarized in a civilized manner under the external governance of the United Nations. However, as long as the United Nations is run by another Kremlin agent, António Guterres, and Russia, which has never signed or ratified the UN Charter, illegally takes the place of the USSR, it is difficult to even imagine discussing such measures within the UN.

#RussiaisATerroistState #RussianUkrainianWar #UN

[NEXTA @nexta_tv]

Putin humiliated the UN Secretary General who came to bow to a Russian dictator

Putin, in instructive fashion, demanded that the UN be “reformed” by flooding the UN Security Council with Russian proxy Third World countries - the dictatorial regimes of Asia, Africa and Latin America.

Secretary General Gutterish swallowed this, but his face clearly expressed displeasure.

[🌾Quellwasser🌸 @Quellwasser_G]

金砖支付10月27日正式启用，金砖支付结算系统总部在上海。

[Denys Shtilierman @DenShtilierman]

We can talk a lot about what Guterres did not do as UN Secretary General. Guterres ignored numerous facts of violations of the rules of war, war crimes and crimes against humanity committed in Ukraine and Israel. The Red Cross, thanks to his inaction, actually works for terrorists. The UN turns a blind eye to violations of its own resolutions on North Korea and Iran, which allows Russia to continue the war. In addition to supplying weapons and ammunition that the Russians use to kill Ukrainians and seize territory, North Korea has begun sending its soldiers, effectively becoming a party to the war against Ukraine. Guterres doesn't care.

The fact remains that Guterres has turned the UN into an empty shell. The organization, which was supposed to serve as a bulwark of international law and justice, in fact supports bloody regimes waging wars of conquest. What is this but aiding and abetting criminals? Otherwise, it is impossible to explain why the UN Secretary General refused the President of Ukraine, a country suffering from the unjust aggression of a nuclear power, to attend the Global Peace Summit, but accepted an invitation from the aggressor and attended the BRICS summit.

The UN Secretary General came to Kazan to shake hands with the criminal, whom in July 2024 he himself found guilty of mass murder and torture in Olenivka. To shake hands with a criminal who has a warrant issued by the International Criminal Court for the abduction of children from the occupied territories of Ukraine. What else can Guterres do to show the world what his UN governance has led to? Let me remind you that the League of Nations, which is traditionally accused of weakness and inaction, was not afraid to exclude from its membership the USSR and Germany - the two largest countries, which at that time ruled half of the world and legitimately occupied their seats in the organization. At the same time, Guterres completely ignores the fact of Russia's illegal occupation of the USSR's seat in the UN.

All of the UN secretary general's criminal inaction is actually a direct support of Russia and Putin in the war against Ukraine. Perhaps his real task is to help Putin destroy hundreds of thousands of Ukrainian lives and turn millions of people into refugees. Maybe for such “proof of merit” Guterres will receive additional rewards from the Kremlin. Anything is possible. After all, speaking about these outrageous facts, we unwittingly praise the UN Secretary General, confirming his “merits” to the master.

Other facts about Guterres' “work” as UN chief:

Guterres refused to directly condemn the atrocities of the Syrian regime and its allies such as Russia and Iran, indulging in their actions during the conflict. He failed to act in the face of attacks on civilians and the use of chemical weapons, further entrenching the Assad regime and continuing the suffering of millions of Syrians.

In Afghanistan, Guterres also failed to act, refusing to actively intervene in the crisis after the Taliban came to power, leading to a deterioration in the human rights situation, especially for women and minorities. This led to the execution of thousands of civilians and the triumph of Sharia law.

In the Israeli-Palestinian war, Guterres indulged terrorist organizations such as Hamas until 2023, refusing to strongly condemn their actions. He continued to deliver “humanitarian aid” to regions where it fell into the hands of terrorists. Under Guterres' leadership, UNRWA became a full-fledged collaborator with terrorists, training soldiers from an early age, hosting arms depots, etc.

After Hamas' brutal October 7 attack on Israel, which killed more than 1,400 people and took 220 citizens hostage, Guterres continued his policy of supporting Hamas. The UN Secretary General regularly condemns Israel's actions. UNRWA has begun to openly participate in terrorist attacks, and the UN helps Hamas and Hezbollah murderers hide in bunkers erected beneath UN facilities. Israel has rightly accused Guterres of collaborating with terrorists and turning a blind eye to the crimes of Iran and its satellites. Israeli Foreign Minister Yisrael Katz declared Guterres persona non grata, barring him from entering the country. In response to the criticism, Guterres said that the Hamas attack “did not arise from nothing,” justifying the terrorists' actions.

Returning to Ukraine, the UN has done everything it can to make Putin as comfortable as possible to wage the biggest war in Europe since World War II.

Guterres came to Ukraine and blackmailed us with the success of the grain deal in exchange for the launch of the ammonia pipeline. When we refused, Russia began shelling ports and grain ships. The UN Secretary General immediately wrote a letter to Lavrov proposing a grain deal. The gist of the letter:

Proposal 1. Guterres proposes to lift the financial sanctions imposed by the EU against Russian Agricultural Bank (RSHB), which is disconnected from SWIFT (in which, by the way, Guterres has an account). In particular, to circumvent the sanctions, the UN Secretary General proposes to use a specially founded subsidiary of the Russian bank called “RSHB Capital S.A.” and connect it to the SWIFT system. In simple words: the UN chief wants to create a fake bank that will circumvent EU and US sanctions against Russian banks.

Proposal 2. Guterres proposes to insure Russian ships that will export grain against Ukrainian attacks. Thus immediately putting Ukraine in the position of aggressor. “A co-financing insurance company with the UN for Russian food and fertilizer exports could be in operation with Lloyd's within 4-6 weeks,” the letter says. The UN chief proposes not only “cargo insurance for Russian food and fertilizer exports” but also “hull and P&I” insurance. “Hull insurance” is insurance for ships used for transportation, and "P&I" is comprehensive third-party liability insurance.

Proposal 3. Unlocking the accounts of Russian fertilizer producers in Europe. Unblocking Russian money that goes to kill Ukrainians. The letter notes that the UN is “already working” on this issue.

And finally, Proposition 4. “Ensure efficient access of Russian food and fertilizer ships to EU ports through fast port permits.” Namely, “The United Nations stands ready to explore further options to facilitate access of Russian vessels to EU ports related to agricultural trade, including simplified procedures for issuing relevant permits, including before leaving Russian ports.”

The original news can be found at the following request: “Bild: The UN Secretary General offered Sergei Lavrov a four-point agreement for Russia to return to the ‘grain agreement.’”

We should not forget that Guterres hides the number of civilian deaths in Ukraine. He uses the phrases “killed on Russian-controlled territory” and “killed on Ukrainian-controlled territory”, shifting responsibility to both sides.

Guterres also facilitates Russia's illegal occupation of the USSR's seat at the UN, which allows Russia to block the Security Council and prevents Ukraine from imposing adequate sanctions, receiving frozen funds and declaring Russia's international criminals wanted. To solve the problem with Russia at the UN, he could have simply given police powers and demanded documents from the Russian delegation at the entrance to the UN building, preventing them from entering. Thereby shifting the burden of proving the right to be in the UN to Russia. And since there are no such documents, Russia would simply not be able to enter the UN building (prior to its accession, with a new government, no wars of aggression, and with internationally recognized borders). However, Guterres obviously will never bite the hand that feeds him.

#BRICS #BRICSSummit #RussiaisATerroistState

[Dr. Eli David @DrEliDavid]

“H×mas used an advanced arsenal of weapons, many of which made in Iran 🇮🇷. They all got into Gaza through the the border with Egypt. Now that Israel conquered that border, it can never leave it again, to prevent rearmament of terrorists.”

From my interview with @visegrad24

[Denys Shtilierman @DenShtilierman]

I read Franklin Foer's article “What Elon Musk Really Wants.” There is a lot of interesting stuff, but especially memorable were the first lines:
“In Elon Musk’s vision of human history, Donald Trump is the singularity.”
Is that so? What is the richest man in the world, whose fortune is estimated at $270.5 billion, really concerned about? Is Elon Musk “poised to live out the ultimate techno-authoritarian fantasy” and has therefore tied his fate to the outcome of the U.S. presidential election?

In an interview with Tucker Carlson, Musk stated, “If Trump loses, how long do you think my prison sentence is going to be?” That admission sounds like regret for complicity in a crime. Is this the kind of thinking that people who dream of the role of “master engineer who remakes the American state” take on?

Elon Musk is taking a risky gamble by funding Trump's campaign in Pennsylvania. He “plans on spending $500 million on it.” Based on monitoring Musk's business, to which Foer devoted a paragraph: “SpaceX relies on contracts with three-letter agencies and the Pentagon.” This is why, if Trump is defeated, Musk could not only lose his contracts, but also witness the rise of Jeff Bezos' Blue Origin, which for some unknown reason is not mentioned in the article.

Franklin Foer calls Trump a dream for Musk:
“So when Trump brags that Musk will send a rocket to Mars during his administration, he’s not imagining a reprise of the Apollo program. He’s envisioning cutting SpaceX one of the largest checks that the U.S. government has ever written. He’s talking about making the richest man in the world even richer..”

Also in the article there is a paragraph about the grand reforms Musk plans to make to the U.S. government:
“Dismantling the federal government—eliminating swaths of the politically neutral civil service and entire Cabinet departments and agencies.”
Franklin Foer is clearly afraid of Elon Musk's possible future role and calls him a “technoking,” warning the American public:
“He wouldn’t need to fear congressional oversight and could brush aside any American who dares to question his role.”

I have two remarks about this:

First, the author fails to take into account the greed of Trump himself, for whom all the arrangements with Elon Musk mean nothing. He has already repeatedly contradicted his own statements and made decisions that went against his promises.

Second, Musk and Trump, each for their own reasons, fervently hate Jeff Bezos, who clearly supports Kamala Harris. The author completely failed to take this into account.

It's no secret that Musk and Bezos are direct rivals, so the US presidential election is yet another arena where these multi-billionaires are competing. The simplest explanation for Musk's obsession with bringing Trump to power is to beat Bezos. The moment Musk and Trump agreed back in the distant 2015, Bezos was immediately attacked, as he himself tweeted:
“Finally trashed by @realDonaldTrump. Will still reserve him a seat on the Blue Origin rocket.”

Musk clearly wants to become the sole conqueror of space and is willing to do anything for that goal. From his statements to Tucker Carlson and his insane ambition, it's obvious that Elon does have something to fear in the event of Trump's defeat.

#Trump #Musk #Election2024

@elonmusk @JeffBezos

[Denys Shtilierman @DenShtilierman]

Илон Маск всё больше превращается в российского олигарха.

Владелец компании SpaceX, очевидно, решил, что может купить будущее Америки, раздавая по 1 миллиону долларов в день в рамках своей кампании поддержки Трампа!

Как пишет The Guardian:

"Илон Маск заявил, что его комитет политических действий в поддержку Трампа - America Pac - будет выделять $1 млн каждый день до дня выборов тому, кто подпишет их петицию, призывающую республиканцев в ключевых штатах зарегистрироваться для участия в голосовании (за Трампа)."

Прямо перед нами разворачивается примитивная, но ужасающая попытка подкупа избирателей, ничем не отличающаяся от "гречки" на постсоветском пространстве. Сразу видно, что эту "гениальную" стратегию посоветовали кремлёвские "политтехнологи". Постсоветские политики и олигархи тратили миллионы долларов на покупку голосов, предлагая людям продать свою совесть за еду, а Маск делает то же самое, только по-американски. Илон уже вложил 75 миллионов долларов в поддержку кампании Трампа, и на лотерею он добавил ещё 17 миллионов.

То, что делает Маск, — это политическая коррупция в чистом виде. Если ему позволят купить победу для Трампа, США ничем не будут отличаться от стран, таких как Россия, Грузия, Беларусь и Украина времён Януковича, где олигархи использовали свои богатства для контроля политики и прихода к власти.

Лотерея Илона Маска — это не просто подарок, а маркер сознательности американского избирателя. Если люди поведутся на неё и это приведёт к победе Трампа (что может разрушить американскую демократию), лотерея грозит стать символом, который превратил страну в очередную олигархическую диктатуру.

#Elon_Musk #MAGA #Trump

@realDonaldTrump @elonmusk

[Matthew VanDyke @Matt_VanDyke]

Someday when #Trump is no longer a political issue, we’ll need to reflect on how our country elected a Russian asset despite all the red flags.

“‘The perfect target’: Russia cultivated Trump as asset for 40 years – ex-KGB spy”

#StandWithUkraine

https://t.co/Fdql3k6gpL

[Steven Hassan, PhD @CultExpert]

Mainstream media has silenced me, a cult expert who wrote The Cult of Trump. Regarding puppets, Trump and Vance are puppets- are you being used too, Elon? Or do you believe you are a puppetmaster? Maybe you are? Thiel too? Opus Dei, NAR, Christian Nationalists! Nazis, Moonies, Falun Gong? Oh, Putin, how could I leave him out?

[Senator Marco Rubio: Archived @SenMarcoRubio]

America lost critical industries and millions of jobs to China.

Ending Permanent Normal Trade Relations with China would be good for America and help restore American manufacturing.
https://t.co/sMhPqiGolN

[Republicans against Trump @RpsAgainstTrump]

🚨Trump's former Director of National Intelligence, Dan Coats, suspects Putin is blackmailing Trump.

This should be a much bigger news story.