At the Unite the Kingdom rally in Parliament Square. No sign of the hatred Two-Tier Keir said he wouldn't tolerate. And a distinct lack of "far right racist thugs". Instead of condemning these good natured flag-waving patriots, Starmer, why don't you listen to them?
A sea of 🇬🇧 🏴 🏴 🏴 🇮🇪 flags and Brits singing Sweet Caroline.
No face masks, no genocide chants, no adoration for murderous regimes, no support for proscribed groups.
@Keir_Starmer is this what hate and division looks like? Looks welcoming to me.
'The full might of the left-wing establishment wants you to kick off and play right into their hands. So please, don't!'
@PatrickChristys's message to Unite the Kingdom attendees after Keir Starmer's announcement to clamp down on the event.
🚨 This is two-tier “justice” in Keir Starmer’s Britain at its most blatant and stomach-churning — and the entire country is watching in disbelief.
Clear-as-day CCTV footage from Manchester Airport shows two brothers, Mohammed Fahir Amaaz and Muhammad Amaad, launching a savage, unprovoked attack on police officers. Headbutting innocent members of the public. Kicking the living daylights out of female officers. Dragging a male PC to the floor from behind like animals. The whole sickening incident captured on camera for the world to see.
Yet here we are — jury deliberations dragging on for days on what should have been an open-and-shut guilty verdict in under one minute. No “he said, she said.” No blurry footage. Just raw, undeniable evidence of thugs attacking the very people we pay to protect us.
How is this even possible?
The question every decent Brit is asking — and the one the establishment refuses to answer — is simple: what does that jury look like? How many from the same community as the defendants? How many terrified of being branded “racist” for doing the right thing? In two-tier Britain, guilt or innocence increasingly depends on the perpetrator’s background, not the evidence. While British patriots get fast-tracked to prison for “hurty tweets” after Southport, while peaceful Unite the Kingdom marchers face armoured vehicles and £4.5 million in policing costs, these brothers get endless hand-wringing and every possible benefit of the doubt.
This isn’t justice.
This isn’t due process.
This is the grooming-gang cover-up machine repeating itself in real time — authorities too scared of “community relations” to protect our police, our streets or our people.
The same Starmer regime that banned journalists, invoked Henry VIII powers to rejoin the EU by stealth, protected Islamist mobs screaming at the King, and lets BBC nonces and police inspectors with hundreds of child abuse images walk free now bends over backwards to avoid convicting violent attackers from the “protected” community.
The silent majority has had enough of this dangerous farce.
We demand:
✅ Immediate guilty verdicts and maximum sentences — no more delays, no more excuses.
✅ Jury reform so justice isn’t held hostage by demographic bias or fear of “racism” labels.
✅ Mass deportations for these brothers and anyone else who comes here only to attack our emergency services.
✅ An end to the two-tier circus that protects imported thugs while crushing native Brits who want safe streets and real law and order.
If these brothers walk or get a slap on the wrist, the message is crystal clear: attack British police on camera and the system will protect you.
Enough is enough.
Protect our officers.
Deliver real justice.
Restore Britain before it’s too late.
@AngelaRayner, a few questions your statement does not answer.
Tax Policy Associates, one of the most respected independent tax bodies in the country, states it cannot understand why HMRC decided not to charge a penalty. Both of your advisers explicitly told you to obtain specialist tax advice before completing the transaction. You did not obtain it. Independent experts say a penalty of approximately 20 percent was the likely and legally correct outcome under Schedule 24 of the Finance Act 2007. HMRC reached a different conclusion without explaining why. Do you believe HMRC reached the correct conclusion and if so can you explain why two independent expert bodies disagree?
You state you had no personal financial interest in the trust set up for your son. The trust was funded in part by NHS compensation money awarded for your son's care. You sold your remaining stake in your Ashton constituency home to that trust for £162,500 in January 2025 and used those proceeds as a deposit on an £800,000 flat in Hove. How do you define no personal financial interest in that transaction?
A £50,000 donation to the Office of Angela Rayner Limited from Refrigeration House Limited arrived on 24 March 2026, described as towards staffing costs and declared on the parliamentary register. Weeks later you paid the £40,000 stamp duty bill. Who owns Refrigeration House Limited, what is their connection to you, and was any part of that donation used directly or indirectly to meet the stamp duty liability?
You say politicians should be held to high standards. The questions above are what high standards look like in practice. They deserve answers.
Saturday in London:
4,000 officers.
Armoured vehicles on standby for the first time.
Live facial recognition deployed at a protest for the first time.
7 foreign speakers banned from entering the UK.
Riot gear for every officer.
The threat? Grandmothers. Mothers. People like you and me.
If You Demanded Answers From Farage, Demand The Same From Rayner
The standard of accountability cannot change depending on which party is under scrutiny. If it does, it means nothing. That principle applies this morning with particular force to two stories running simultaneously that the political class would prefer to keep separate.
Nigel Farage is under formal investigation by the Parliamentary Standards Commissioner and the Electoral Commission over an undeclared £5 million personal gift from Christopher Harborne, a Thailand based billionaire operating under a Thai alias named in the Panama Papers who has given £22 million in total to Farage and his parties. The investigations were triggered because the gift was not declared within the mandatory window for new MPs. Farage maintains it was a personal unconditional gift for his security. The regulators have decided the question warrants formal examination. That is the system working as it should. The same standard should now be applied to Angela Rayner.
Rayner has received £150,000 in total from Refrigeration House Limited across three separate payments, in December 2025, February 2026 and March 2026, all described as towards staffing costs and declared on the parliamentary register. The company's director Paul Jordon told the New Statesman it was a local family business set up in 1965. Companies House tells a different story. Refrigeration House Limited, company number 15999252, was incorporated on 4 October 2024. Its stated nature of business is not refrigeration. It is SIC code 64305, activities of property unit trusts. Its share capital is £1. Its first accounts are not yet due.
A company incorporated fourteen months ago with £1 of capital, whose stated business activity has nothing to do with refrigeration, has donated £150,000 to a senior politician's office while its director publicly describes it as a sixty year old family business. Those facts are documented and on the public record. They raise questions that are identical in character to the questions being asked about Harborne. Who controls this company. Why was it incorporated in October 2024. Why does its business classification not match its stated purpose. And why has its director publicly misrepresented its age to a national magazine.
HMRC has also cleared Rayner of wrongdoing over her stamp duty affairs without charging a penalty that independent tax experts describe as the legally correct outcome. Tax Policy Associates states it cannot understand why no penalty was charged given that Rayner was explicitly advised twice to obtain specialist tax advice and did not do so. The regulator reached a conclusion that independent experts consider legally incorrect without explaining why.
Two politicians. Two sets of documented questions about money. One under formal investigation. One cleared without explanation by a regulator whose decision independent experts cannot account for.
The voters who delivered their verdict on May 7 were tired of a political class that applies rules selectively and answers questions only when forced. They voted for accountability. Accountability means the same questions get asked of everyone. Farage is answering to the Parliamentary Standards Commissioner and the Electoral Commission. The questions around Rayner and Refrigeration House Limited deserve the same scrutiny. Not because the answers are predetermined. Because the standard has to mean something.
"Two politicians. Two sets of documented questions about money. One under formal investigation. One cleared without explanation"
Caught trying to make our country like his home from home, this foreigner on a mobility scooter funny enough can lift a heavy wooden front door? Is caught he follows him as he drives on roads? But good for this guy getting it on camera! We should all start shaming them and film
As Gordon comes in to “save” the economy it’s worth remembering 2010,
when Nigel Farage was an MEP in the European Parliament and Gordon Brown was Prime Minister.
Starmer thinks we’ve forgotten. We haven’t!
GLORIOUS 🔥
HALF A MILLION PEOPLE WERE DEFRAUDED
Imagine you are behind on your store card payments. You are already struggling. Then the bank quietly adds an extra charge on top of what you owe. Not because it costs them that much. Just because .. they can. And because they think nobody is watching.
Someone was watching.
Nicholas Wilson was a debt recovery lawyer. He goes by Mr Ethical @nw_nicholas on X. His old boss meant it as an insult. In 2003 he noticed that @HSBC subsidiary HFC Bank was adding an illegal 16.4% charge onto the debts of people who were already in financial trouble.
Store cards from John Lewis, Currys, B&Q, Dixons, PC World. Ordinary people. Struggling people. Being quietly robbed.
He told his boss it was illegal. His boss started calling him "Mr Ethical" as a joke. Then they sacked him.
He reported it to the regulators. @TheFCA ignored him for years.
When a researcher separately wrote to both HSBC and the FCA asking about the fraud...
... both wrote back with responses in the exact same wording, same punctuation, same paragraphs. The bank and the regulator were sharing the same script.
FCA's own independent Complaints Commissioner eventually investigated. He called it the worst case of regulatory failure he had ever dealt with.
FCA's response was to appoint Ruth Kelly, an HSBC director, and Baroness Hogg from John Lewis, onto its own board. The two people they were supposed to be investigating were now sitting inside the regulator.
You actually cannot make this up.
After 13 years of Wilson refusing to go away, HSBC quietly agreed to pay some money back. FCA announced 6,700 victims.
Wilson says the real number is closer to 500,000. HSBC has now set aside £223 million for repayments. No fine. No criminal charges. No one went to prison. No one was even publicly named.
Wilson has spent the last 20 years unemployable. Blacklisted. Living on state benefits. Fighting to keep his home. Someone even anonymously reported him to the DWP for benefit fraud while the actual billion pound fraud went unpunished.
The bank that robbed half a million people kept its licence.
The man who caught them lost everything.
Source: @guardian | @BBC | @PrivateEyeNews | @SundayMirror | @realmediauk | nicholaswilson com | @nw_nicholas and others.
The person who attacked my daughter, spat on my wife, and broke the restaurant's front door was not arrested by @metpoliceuk. Why?
I was arrested again for defending my family 😂
This was the SUV they came in.
Please repost
NHS DESTROYED THE WOMAN WHO CAUGHT ITS DOCTORS STEALING FROM IT
Sharmila Chowdhury @sharmilaxx gave 30 years of spotless service to the @NHS. Not one disciplinary mark. Not one complaint. She was the budget holder for radiology at Ealing Hospital NHS Trust, which means she could see exactly where the money was going.
What she saw was two consultant radiologists billing the NHS for shifts they were spending at a private hospital down the road. The Trust lost £250,000 of public money through those arrangements.
She reported it to her line manager. Her medical director. HR. Counter Fraud. The Department of Health. The Treasury. Number 10.
She had a paper trail so airtight that @ITV undercover surveillance later caught the same consultants still absent during paid hours, and caught Miranda Harvie and Akkib Rafique taking direct cash payments from patients for private ultrasounds inside the NHS building, money going straight into their own account.
So what did the Trust do with this documented, camera-confirmed, publicly broadcast fraud?
They sacked her. On fabricated counter-allegations from a subordinate she had herself reported for breaching patient safety. The man who filed those allegations later sent an email signed off with "0800-F***-YOU-B****." He received a Top Mentor award from the Trust that same year.
Sharmila won the Interim Relief Hearing. She won the internal appeal. The judge asked the Trust to reinstate her. The Trust said no and refused to let her return. She was blacklisted. Job offers were withdrawn the moment employers discovered who she was. She settled out of court in 2012 with two years pay, out of which she had to pay £77,500 in legal fees alone. 38 Degrees38 Degrees
In July 2013, she was diagnosed with breast and lung cancer. Multiple consultants believe this is a direct result of the sustained stress of her treatment as a whistleblower.
The consultants she reported kept their jobs.
George Osborne said he could not get involved. Andrew Lansley said he could not get involved. David Cameron said he could not get involved. Every single official body, every single minister, every single department looked at a proven, camera-documented NHS fraud case and decided it was an employment matter.
Read Sharmila's full case: sharmilachowdhury com
Sources: Health Select Committee written evidence | @DailyMail | @Independent | @BBCNews | @Channel4 | @guardian | @thetimes | @DailyMirror | @Channel4News | @ITV
Top British attorney Natasha Hausdorff stunned the audience by completely destroying the Palestinian narrative about the conflict. The truth the world refuses to accept:
Palestine never existed as a sovereign Arab state.
The British Mandate of Palestine was a British territory taken from the defeated Ottoman Empire after 1917. Jews lived continuously in the Holy Land for centuries — long before modern Zionism. They were the majority in Jerusalem under Ottoman rule. Jews legally bought desert land (including the area that became Tel Aviv) and turned it into thriving cities and kibbutzim. Not a single Arab was displaced by these purchases.
The Arabs rejected the 1947 UN partition plan and launched war to destroy the newborn Jewish state. They lost. During that war, Arab armies ordered local Arabs to flee so they could “push the Jews into the sea.” Many did exactly that.
Israel has never committed genocide. It has fought for survival against repeated attempts to commit genocide against the Jewish people. Hamas, Hezbollah, and Iran’s regime are the real obstacles to peace in the Middle East.
The historical facts are clear. The propaganda is not.
Share this. The truth needs to be heard.
Jeremy Clarkson’s column on Zack Polanski in The Sun is pure gold! 😅😂
He said:
"I do wish people would stop touting Zack Polanski as a serious contender in the next election. He isn’t. My donkey is more likely to get elected."
He then brings attention to the awkward way in which Polanski was seen running through conference hall:
"The man isn’t even built properly - a point that becomes clear if you watch that social media gif of him running through a conference hall. Tom Cruise he is not. It’s like his arms are where his legs should be and vice versa and as a result, he has the stupidest running style I’ve ever seen."
Clarkson then comments on Polanski's desperate attempt to try a point the finger at the methods police officers used to apprehend the Golders Green terrorist:
"And then there’s what he says. This week, he castigated those policemen who tackled the knife-wielding thug in London, saying he’d seen them 'repeatedly and violently kicking a mentally ill man in the head',"
Finally closing with:
"And he thinks that normal people with fully formed adult brains will vote for him. Not a chance,"
Jeremy Clarkson is a national treasure and speaks with common sense. Neither of those qualities will ever be attributed to Zack Polanski.
Well done Jezza! 💯👏
A car tax disk from 1982, for six months at £38.50
A gallon of petrol cost £1.60
A pint of beer cost 61p
A pint of milk cost 20p
A 22" colour TV cost £300
Average house price was £33,000
A Ford Cortina cost £4,200
6 eggs cost 40p
The AVERAGE annual salary was £5,000
1/ In January 2008, PC Neil Sampson walked towards a man with a knife. He took seven stab wounds doing it.
His dog Anya, already bleeding, kept hold of the attacker so her handler could live.
That same man, Essa Suleiman stabbed two people yesterday in a terror attack in Golders Green.
Here’s what happened next. 🧵
In November 2023, a Palantir-led consortium was awarded a £330 million contract to run the NHS Federated Data Platform. It was awarded by the Conservative government. What happened next happened under Labour.
In April 2025, Chinese researchers were granted access to NHS Biobank data despite MI5 warnings that Chinese organisations could be ordered by intelligence agencies to work on Beijing's behalf. One in five successful applications for UK Biobank data came from China. BGI, a Chinese genetics company blacklisted by the United States for links to military programmes and the surveillance of ethnic minorities, was among those granted access. Health officials pressed ahead regardless.
Two days later, a former deputy head of MI6 warned publicly that China could use NHS data to develop a targeted bioweapon. MI5 had already warned that Chinese access to UK data posed direct national security risks. The government's response was to say it had strict security procedures in place.
In May 2025, Chinese state-linked hackers directly attacked University College Hospital and University Hospital Southampton in what intelligence firm EclecticIQ described as a credible espionage campaign linked to a Chinese intelligence gathering group operating across multiple countries.
In November 2025, former defence secretary Gavin Williamson wrote formally to Darren Jones warning that Chinese access to NHS data posed an immense risk and constituted a direct threat to national security. Britain, he said, was lagging behind its allies. The government did not act.
This week, the health data of half a million UK Biobank volunteers appeared for sale on Alibaba, listed by three Chinese research institutions. Researchers described it as the 198th known exposure of Biobank data since last summer.
The escalating pattern sits alongside connections the government has not explained. Palantir's NHS contract was facilitated in part by Global Counsel, the lobbying firm Peter Mandelson co-founded and in which he held a 24 percent stake. Global Counsel had Palantir as a registered client. The connection between Global Counsel and Palantir was reportedly absent from Mandelson's vetting as ambassador. On February 27 2025, Mandelson arranged an undeclared meeting between Starmer and Palantir executives in Washington with no minutes taken. Seven months later Palantir won a £240 million MoD contract without competitive tender.
Meanwhile Wes Streeting gave instructions in October 2024 to press ahead with transferring half a million GP records to Biobank despite objections from GPs and privacy campaigners, at precisely the moment Chinese access to that data was under active security service scrutiny.
Since Palantir was awarded the NHS contract in November 2023, the incidents have escalated significantly. Synnovis ransomware June 2024. Chinese state-linked hospital hacks May 2025. Repeated Biobank exposures throughout 2025. The Alibaba breach this week. Whether that escalation is connected to Palantir's expanding presence in NHS data infrastructure, or reflects other vulnerabilities being exploited simultaneously, is a question that has not been asked with sufficient rigour.
Why were MI5 warnings about Chinese access repeatedly overridden? Why did the government expand Chinese researchers' access to NHS data while being warned it posed a direct threat to national security? Why was the meeting between Starmer, Mandelson and Palantir not declared? And why did a company with a direct financial connection to the British ambassador win a three quarter of a billion pound defence contract without competition?
The warnings were formal, documented and delivered by serious people. They were ignored. The breaches escalated. And the connections between the decisions that enabled both have never been explained.
"Streeting gave instructions in October 2024 to press ahead with transferring half a million GP records to Biobank"
@SootySec@SumTingWong008@GBPolitcs@G18BYG@Telegraph "NLM was set up in 1988 and has developed into a significant provider of housing to meet the needs of the wider Community irrespective of race, gender, disability, belief, sexual orientation, age or socio-economic background."