@ChonggoL8939 It’s not like that at all because your alive in both of the choices I gave you a drug addict can become drug free a pedophile can’t be cured only suppressed. Yet toy put them on the same level.
@ChonggoL8939 I have no problems with Lolis in anime that is story driven and the sole purpose isnt sexualization what I’m referring to is hentai tagged with Lolicon and shotacon.
@ChonggoL8939 The question has relevance bc you stated drug abuse should be banned aswell if the depictions of children having sex is banned so I asked which would you rather be a drug addict or a pedophile. There is only one right answer you chose not to answer bc u defend pedophile behavior
@ChonggoL8939 And sure however the main focus of her whar you mentioned is still based on a story Loli content is not based on a story the sole intention is primarily the sex thus comparing them is retarded
@ChonggoL8939 This is still just a poor attack on inconsistency but the facts of the matter is ther Stephen king merely wrote about Loli content has illustrations panel by panel which showcases in detail.
@ChonggoL8939 So it’s very detestable to even argue drug abuse is acceptable in fiction so somehow in that small brain the depiction of children getting raped and sexually abused is on same level as drug abuse 😑 respect for the conversation though. It’s just a shame man you die on this hill
@ChonggoL8939 THE INTENT OF SEXUAL CONTENT FICTION AND NON FICTION IS FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE OF SEXUAL AROUSAL. THE INTENT IS TO MAKE YOU JERK YOUR CHICKEN TO WHAT EVER IS BEING SHOWN IN THIS CASE ITS THE DEPICTIONS OF CHILDREN HAVING SEX.
@ChonggoL8939 So your saying the sexualized depictions of children in fiction is at best “Uncomfortable”. Let ask you a question would you rather be a drug addict or a pedophile?
@ChonggoL8939 Your response is essentially saying that people should be able to create content that sexualizes allbeit fictional still children within realm of the art it itself. under the guise of artistic expression ?
@ChonggoL8939 The flaw in your argument is that you’re assuming all fictional content should be judged by the same standard. Fictional violence isn’t created to encourage a desire to commit violence, whereas loli and shotacon are specifically designed to sexualize children.
@ChonggoL8939 Now of course this would not be considered CP or I agree with that 100% however given the nature of the content can we agree that it is deplorable and should be at the bare minimum banned and enforce as a lesser crime to actual CP ?
@ChonggoL8939 We are aware that in majority of Loli and shota content that is sexual are canonically human they may have dimensions that if directly translated to real life would look uncanny but it doesn’t take away that they are representations of humans.
@ChonggoL8939@_evnn Your statement is a False Dichotomy you make it seem as if we have to ignore this in order to care about something else or if we care about the depiction of what is canonically children in fiction somehow we don’t care about the real thing which is retarded 4 u to think that.