๐ช๐ฒ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐บ๐ผ๐๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ณ๐๐ป๐ฑ ๐ถ๐ป๐๐ถ๐ฑ๐ฒ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ณ๐๐ป๐ฑ.
Until this week, TDAQ held its stocks through another ETF, and that fund's expenses sat on top of ours.
Now TDAQ holds its stocks directly.
๐ง๐๐๐ค'๐ ๐๐ผ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๐ฎ๐น ๐ฎ๐ป๐ป๐๐ฎ๐น ๐ณ๐๐ป๐ฑ ๐ผ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ฒ๐ ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ป๐๐ฒ๐: ๐ฌ.๐ด๐ฏ% โ ๐ฌ.๐ฒ๐ด%
Our 0.68% management fee is unchanged.
The 0.15% in acquired fund fees is gone.
๐ช๐ต๐ฎ๐ ๐๐๐ฎ๐๐ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐ฎ๐บ๐ฒ:
โ Same ticker
โ Same daily covered-call strategy
โ Same distribution schedule
Shareholders don't need to do anything.
See TDAQ's updated fee table and holdings โ https://t.co/zUZHueNgaU
#ETFs #GrowthAndIncome
Price a fund company like a stock.
NEOS: $35.1B x 0.68% fee = about $240M a year.
@GoldmanSachs ($GS) is paying up to $2.25B. That's ~9.5x the fee line.
For a business whose product is, in the end, a spreadsheet full of options.
https://t.co/sSp40oXjRW
The men who founded NEOS built $QYLD first.
2013, a tiny shop called Recon. $52M after year one.
Then @GlobalXETFs took it over and they walked out.
QYLD is $8.5B today. So they built it again, and QQQI passed it in under two years.
https://t.co/sSp40oXjRW
Goldman is paying up to $2.25B for NEOS.
19 funds. $35.1B in assets.
78.4% of it sits in two tickers: $QQQI at $15.09B and SPYI at $12.40B.
They aren't buying a fund company. They're buying two funds.
https://t.co/sSp40oXjRW
In April, @GoldmanSachs paid $2B for a firm whose customers buy protection.
In August, it agreed to pay up to $2.25B for NEOS, home of $QQQI, whose customers sell it.
Same bank. Five months. Both ends of the same trade.
https://t.co/sSp40oXjRW
Software and chips have been taking turns.
Software ETF $IGV vs chip ETF SMH, last 30 sessions: correlation 0.05, opposite directions 17 of 30 days. Sep 14: software +5.0%, chips -4.8%.
Chips still own 2026: +62.5% vs +3.3%.
Both on the Stage Board:
https://t.co/musTzo5db0
Follow-up on the agentic rollout: if trading agents become mainstream via MCP, order routing shifts from clicks to autonomous API calls.
The real bottleneck wonโt be model intelligence from @openai or @claudeai โ itโll be execution guarantees and API rate caps.
I asked CARL, the AI on the RIR platform, how Stage 4 stocks usually behave:
"Rallies inside Stage 4 are usually treated as sell-into-strength opportunities rather than reversals."
$APP has been in Stage 4 since Aug 7.
Ask CARL anything:
https://t.co/TUgMGFvQnq
Since the August report, the rest of software rallied and $APP didn't come with it.
IGV, ServiceNow, Salesforce and Zeta climbed. AppLovin sits near its lows, still growing 53% at ~15x forward earnings.
Gaps like that can close fast. Compare them:
https://t.co/hOcmnmXQET
Robinhood just announced agentic trading for $HOOD โ users can connect any LLM into dedicated trading accounts via MCP.
Are @openai and @claudeai signing broker licensing deals, or is this BYO API key? Big question: will they let you plug in your pro sub?
The bears think it's about to dump. The bulls use it. That's the bear trap, and that's your short squeeze. $SPY
Astrology for Men, Ep 3 with @LennyMadeThat:
https://t.co/zJdQOdcvIU
AppLovin makes 66% net margins. Zeta makes 2%. The market still picked Zeta.
Same week in August, opposite stages. Here's why, and why I think $APP might be the most mispriced name in software right now.
Full breakdown below. https://t.co/boL2DGBmWr