✨ Return the earth/land. ✨
I care about peacefully dismantling and decolonizing “territory” & eventually all “nations”
Every tree, every pebble, every rock.
Abolition of all tribal, ethnic, racial, 'indigenous' or national territories and the return of the land back to [...]
[...] the state of relations a priori and sui juris to the (coeval) superimposition of territorial imaginaries through aggression is simply good land relations.
@JimMcMurtry01 And if you respond with “yes you come from a recombined copies of DNA from East Asians and there why you are often confused for them” they’ll get mad
If you point out all have DNA from the humans that migrated west into Europe then west across the Atlantic they’ll also get mad
@JimMcMurtry01 And then making it out to be genetic-racial because….
It’s literally about “I’m a new sentience that is born but for some reason my skin tone and appearance is magical for some magical reason”
A majority of Canadians can’t think this complex and are stuck in a racial lord-of-the-rings or star-trek or avatar fantasy, and the racist, primitive and compulsively stealing creators of many of these belief systems are okay with it
Most people aren’t able to believe people can be so devoted to mass land, resource & property theft, continuation of vast distributive spatial inequality & imaginary temporal distributive inequality (a representation discovered by westerners) without some “truth” to their lies
Of course racial beneficiaries of this based on the random-chance of DNA copies of what is & remains exogenous migratory lineages are okay with justifying the theft of endogenous-native (settler) lands who (true first & prior, & sui generis independent inhabitants/interactors)
Of course almost 30 years of manipulative propaganda, 40+ years of strategic invention and ethno-national construction of tribal cults, nation myths, race purity myths, genetic myths, genes-based historical revisionism and spatial/land fictions/falsehoods….alters public opinion
@nationalpost Most people aren’t able to believe people can be so devoted to mass land, resource & property theft, continuation of vast distributive spatial inequality & imaginary temporal distributive inequality (a representation discovered by westerners) without some “truth” to their lies
@nationalpost Of course almost 30 years of manipulative propaganda, 40+ years of strategic invention and ethno-national construction of tribal cults, nation myths, race purity myths, genetic myths, genes-based historical revisionism and spatial/land fictions/falsehoods….alters public opinion
@JesusChristnotw@SkyNews@TrevorPTweets what is this garbage ai generated "overcorrection" (lmao one of the worst words ever) nonsense
this is just as cringe as what so-called 'woke' folks put out
arguably more so
@FowlesMurphy@JimMcMurtry01 Ya I read about that. Was insane how people defended them and all their “akshually.” Absolute madness.
It’s all some white people’s own fear of “woah blonde and blue eyes in conflict with interest of innocent Asian look”
Two unelected white people. Two English descendants. Two costumes. One more childish than the other.
One has some Siberian hunter genetic copies (just variations of DNA). One still has political power.
@UnsettleAliens@RussDiabo@RebeccaAltyNWT@WadeGrant >99.99998% of the “Algonquin” territory as cutely coloured in purple likely by some Algonquin tribal-squatter in the 2000s was categorically uninhabited land area, virtually all never set foot by the simultaneous generations of the 1600s to 1800s:….
There is no “territory”
@RussDiabo@RebeccaAltyNWT@WadeGrant So yes all Algonquin territory is stolen land because it is a land theft construct, as in a retrospectively conceived imaginary construct to steal land that Algonquin settlers have zero seconds, zero molecules and zero historical relationship to (an irrefutable fact).
@RussDiabo@RebeccaAltyNWT@WadeGrant Virtually all of that land area was categorically uninhabited land with no anthropogenic use/occupancg, in which the Alongquin colonization trajectories never even had a concept of land ownership let alone of uninhabited land area that others categorically inhabited first