@Dark_crypt0lord@BCBacker Take it you didn’t follow his 50% sell in late September….then buy it all back at $1.80 to increase your bag by 36% or, even holding back enough to pay 24% tax you increase bag by 6%…or simply wait for lower entry, which he is.
@Putrid_Squid @BCBacker Avoiding taxable events is perfectly sensible, but I bought during the 20c days so taking profits (and paying tax) seemed logical, Also means I can clear out some losses to offset tax, and stack more cash. BCB stating he sees final rally prior to capitulation, what do you see?
@JonKs1994@BCBacker He sold 50% because he is 50:50….surely a win win situation. What did you do….hold through $3.60 all the way down to $1.80? will you diamond hand it down to $1?…is that the smart move?
@Putrid_Squid @BCBacker Not sure that’s fair….if you sold half your bag late September, you would be sitting with a bag of cash. You could deploy now and have increased your bag significantly or you can wait for the lows to arrive. The BCB narrative is to simply state what he sees.
@Rikkoroo@egragcrypto@Stillma63687386 I don’t get the problem. Everyone focusing on the fact he sold 50%, surely that’s a sensible hedge? Why would anyone want to ride it to the bottom without taking profits….i did the same from sub 20c. If $1.50 presents itself, I can but it all Back and more. Data based logic.
@egragcrypto I would say @BCBacker hasn’t called the top. In fact, he has categorically stated he hasn’t called the top. What he HAS said is, he decided to sell 50% because he feels there is still a chance that wasn’t the top. It seems a logical step to me, Secure profits and wait & see.
@egragcrypto You got my attention a few weeks ago….there are only a few people I follow with interest….you definitely present an honest view which seems to be playing out. Great TA, let’s see if we can get this dump over and done with.
@elonmuskTN There would be 9x11 numbers for a full grid, so 99. There is only 1 gap, making 98 numbers. The 3 missing numbers from the sequence 1-100 are 33, 88 and 100. You would need to define what the full sequence was to define just one missing number.