@dakpaklak@SuviAnneSiimes Tämähän on jo faktisesti käytössä verotuksessa. Pienimmillä tuloilla valtionverotus on negatiivinen ja kun tulot nousee 2te/kk tasolle on marginaalivero/progressio aivan järkyttävä.
@juho_orjala Huoh. Orbanin linja? Autoritääriseen suuntaan?
Jos ei ole mitään, siis yhtään mitään, argumenttia voi aina turvautua näihin.
Unohdit vielä putinin pussin?
@minjakoskela@JuhaRistamaki Rahoitus oli myönnetty näille vain siksi että ennenkin oli jaettu 8 miljoonaa.
Ministeri otti puolet rahasta pois koska tutkimusaiheet eivät olleet rahan arvoisia. Oikeassa on.
Tiede ja tutkimus on edelleen vapaata, sitä voi tehdä omalla rahalla ihan mistä aiheesta tahansa.
@juho_orjala Kerrotko vielä
1) montako veteraania Suomessa vielä on
2) paljonko omaisuutta näillä veteraaniyhdistyksillä on tällä hetkellä
.. sitten ehkä huomaat miten populistinen ja typerä kommenttisi on.
@PetteriOrpo Pitäisikö miettiä että millä kriteereillä niitä rahoja jaetaan, ettei vaan heitellä miljoonia jokaiselle joka kehtaa pyytää?
Tilinpäätökset julkisiksi ja aidot vaikuttavuusarviot!
En tiedä milloin kokoomuksesta tuli vasemmistopuolue mutta viime vuodet olleet jyrkkää alamäkeä.
@EsaIivonen@pihanurmi Joidenkin mielestä on vääryyttä että he eivät saa enää elää muiden työllä ja rahoilla.
Miten tällaiseen moraalirappioon on päädytty?
Kuvottavaa.
Ukraine launches TrophyLab: we are opening access to captured Russian weapon technologies for our global partners. Every missile, drone, and vehicle seized on the battlefield is now a source of knowledge for the free world.
Through this secure platform, allied governments, labs, and defense tech manufacturers gain access to deep technical data, reports, and vulnerabilities. Users can also request physical equipment for testing, significantly shortening the development cycle for countermeasures.
What was meant to be the enemy's secret advantage is being dismantled to defend democracy. Join the platform:
🔗 https://t.co/xoeCfXsIy3
@MikaAaltola Se on pelkuruutta. Venäjä pitää tuhota maan tasalle ainakin taloudellisesti ja sotilaallisesti ennen kuin niiden kanssa aloitetaan keskustelu. Ja silloinkin vasta sitten kun putin (tai joku hänen seuraajansa) sitä rukoilee polvillaan!
Two small island economies blew up in 2008. Iceland and Ireland. Their names differ by one letter, and their handling of the crisis differed by everything that matters.
Iceland's three big banks, Kaupthing, Landsbanki, and Glitnir, had grown assets to roughly ten times the country's GDP by 2008. Pure credit-fueled madness. When the music stopped, the Icelandic government did the unthinkable: it let them fail. Bondholders ate the losses. The state refused to socialize private bank debt onto 320,000 citizens who never signed up for it. Capital controls went up, the króna collapsed, and the politicians actually prosecuted bankers. Twenty-six of them went to prison. Sigurður Einarsson and Hreiðar Már Sigurðsson, the men who ran Kaupthing, served real sentences.
Ireland took the opposite road. In September 2008, the Irish government issued a blanket guarantee covering the liabilities of its major banks, including Anglo Irish Bank, a property-lending casino that should have been allowed to die in peace. The taxpayer absorbed the bill. By the time the rescue ended, Ireland had poured around 64 billion euros into its banks, roughly 40 percent of GDP. The state took on private gambling debts, then went to the Troika in 2010 hat in hand for an 85 billion euro bailout, and accepted years of austerity to pay for losses it had no business owning.
Both economies recovered. Both eventually grew again. The difference is who paid and who learned. Iceland made creditors and reckless bankers bear the consequences of their own decisions, which is the entire point of capitalism: profit and loss, not profit and bailout. Ireland protected the people who made the bad bets and handed the invoice to schoolteachers and shopkeepers.
You will hear economists call Ireland's GDP rebound a triumph (much of that "growth" is multinational accounting fiction, Leprechaun economics, but that's another lesson). What they skip is the moral architecture. When you guarantee bank liabilities, you abolish the discipline that makes markets work. You tell every banker in the country that downside is optional.
Iceland jailed its bankers. Ireland reimbursed theirs.
@MP81194613@JuhaRistamaki Jep, ja nämä siis rahoitetaan veronmaksajien maksamista veroista. Kyllä olisi aiheellista julkistaa näiden järjestöjen tilinpäätökset ja vaatia vaikuttavuusanalyysejä, mieluiten puolueettomia, tällaiselle rahankäytölle.
@PetraNyqvist Julkinen sektori tukee ”taidetta” jo nyt todella paljon, mm. julkisten rakennusprojektien budjetissa on aina 1% varattu taiteelle. Se on aika iso raha se.
BREAKING: JD Vance just accidentally confirmed the DIRTY SECRET about Trump's Iran deal.
JD Vance went on CBS News and tried to spin Donald Trump's Iran deal. Instead, he CONFIRMED exactly how badly Trump got fleeced.
CBS correspondent Ed O'Keefe asked Vance point-blank whether Iran would have access to a $300 BILLION reconstruction fund. Vance's answer? Essentially yes — "funded by the Gulf Coast coalition so long as they honor their end of the obligation."
So let's do the math that the Trump administration desperately doesn't want you to do. Let's compare Trump's Iran deal to the one Republicans spent a DECADE calling the worst deal in American history — Barack Obama's.
OBAMA'S IRAN DEAL:
• $1.7 billion in unfrozen Iranian assets
• In exchange for a 98% reduction in Iran's uranium stockpile
• And strict limits capping enrichment at 3.7%
TRUMP'S IRAN DEAL:
• $24 BILLION in unfrozen assets and cash
• A $300 BILLION reconstruction fund
• Lifted sanctions
• In exchange for an "opened Strait" under Iran and Oman's control
Read those numbers again. Trump is handing Iran roughly FOURTEEN TIMES the unfrozen cash Obama did — plus a $300 billion reconstruction windfall — after starting a war that nobody wanted, spiking gas prices, and killing the existing ceasefire because he found negotiations "boring." AND the deal just kicks what happens with Iran's uranium stockpile to future negotiations!
Republicans screamed for YEARS that Obama "gave Iran billions" and "appeased the mullahs." They called his deal treasonous. They tore it up. And now their guy is giving Iran an order of magnitude MORE money for a far weaker arrangement.
But here's the part Vance accidentally revealed. He warned that Iranian hardliners would "over-emphasize the benefits that Iran gets while under-emphasizing all the things they have to concede."
That's PROJECTION. Because it's the TRUMP administration that's been over-emphasizing the "wins" while burying the $24 billion, the $300 billion fund, the lifted sanctions, and the fact that the strategic Strait would fall under Iranian and Omani control. Vance is accusing Iran of doing EXACTLY what his own administration is doing — hiding the real terms of the deal from the public.
The man who promised to be tougher than Obama on Iran just handed Tehran the biggest payday in its history — after dragging America into a war first.
$1.7 billion versus $324 billion. That's the difference between Obama's "terrible" deal and Trump's "great" one.
Someone should mention that.
Please like and share!
@mattimolari@liandersson Ja Suomessa on vielä niin, että nämä lobbari ja edustaja ovat usein yksi ja sama henkilö tai vähintään he ovat hyvin läheisiä tuttuja.
Minusta tämä on vain ja ainoastaan korruptiota.