RNA, Technology and IP Attorneys - A Leading Intellectual Property Law Firm in India - Patent, Design, Copyright, Trademark, Enforcement, IP Investigation
In a recent trademark ruling, the Kerala High Court upheld an interim injunction restraining the use of the mark “HAZZA” for restaurant services, finding it deceptively similar to the well-known mark “LAZZA.”
Author: Mohandas Konnanath
https://t.co/hdQKFbHPui
The Delhi High Court recently delivered a significant ruling on intermediary liability in a trademark infringement dispute involving the mark “HINDWARE” and Google’s AdWords programme.
Authors: Ranjan Narula and Gitanjali Vohra
https://t.co/F2tg6Z2ubR
The Division Bench of the Delhi High Court recently delivered a ruling on the assessment of deceptive similarity in composite trademarks while deciding an appeal arising from a dispute between Jiva Ayurvedic Pharmacy Limited and mark “Shatam Jeeva.”
Author: Mohandas Konnanath
The Bombay High Court has once again reaffirmed that in pharmaceutical trademark disputes, the margin for error is exceedingly narrow.
Author: Mohandas Konnanath
https://t.co/UKn3FvhaoI
The Delhi High Court’s recent judgment in the BEVETEX v. BEVATAS dispute serves as an important reminder of the stringent standards governing pharmaceutical trademarks in India.
Author: Mohandas Konnanath
https://t.co/HZjsa8TNHU
In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court examined the limits of judicial power after passing a final decree in a trademark dispute involving Mahindra and Mahindra Limited.
Author: Mohandas Konnanath
https://t.co/1sQz8x8iBW
A recent Bombay High Court ruling has reaffirmed that interim injunctions in trademark disputes are governed as much by equity as by statutory rights.
Author: Mohandas Konnanath
https://t.co/ggtixlCE9H
In a nuanced take on trademark enforcement, the Bombay High Court has reaffirmed that statutory rights cannot override decades of bona fide commercial identity built around a family name.
Author: Mohandas Konnanath
https://t.co/mhSyoEXZih
In a recent ruling on the interplay between trademark rights and equitable principles, the Bombay High Court refused interim relief in the dispute between Rynox Gears and Steelite India over the marks “RYNOX” and “RHYNOX.”
Author: Mohandas Konnanath
https://t.co/b6kx3WVaPU
In a noteworthy development in pharmaceutical trademark jurisprudence, the Delhi High Court has stepped in to restrain the use of the mark “NOVIETS,” finding it prima facie too close to “NOVARTIS.”
Author: Mohandas Konnanath
https://t.co/nSvjPdhocz
The “KENT” trademark dispute is a telling example of how courts weigh brand reputation against core principles like prior use and acquiescence.
Author: Mohandas Konnanath
https://t.co/V3nuIEmSGG
#trademark#kent#delhihighcourt#intellectualproperty#rnaip
The Delhi High Court has reaffirmed a fundamental principle of Indian trademark law, rights of a prior user take precedence over statutory registration.
Author: Mohandas Konnanath
https://t.co/e5nBc2Lhba
#delhihighcourt#trademark#intellectualproperty#rnaip
A recent order of the Bombay High Court serves as a sharp reminder that undertakings given to the Court carry binding consequences.
Author: Mohandas Konnanath
https://t.co/RAe9lCz4r9
#bombayhighcourt#trademark#intellectualproperty#rnaip
India has introduced the IT Rules Amendment 2026, its first regulatory framework addressing AI-generated content and deepfakes.
Authors: Ranjan Narula and Parth Bajaj
https://t.co/dxUIJgPICW
#artificialintelligence#airegulation#sgi#deepfakes#rnaip
The Bombay High Court has reaffirmed the strength of statutory trademark rights in a recent interim order restraining the use of “TRACK-ON” by a former business associate of Trackon Couriers Private Limited.
Author: Mohandas Konnanath
https://t.co/B1H6mcVw27
A recent interim order of the Bombay High Court once again underscores the strength of statutory trademark rights and the consequences of dishonest adoption.
Author: Mohandas Konnanath
https://t.co/eTVVM1KAwy
#bombayhighcourt#trademark#ipr#rnaip
In Satya Paul v. Alka Industrial Corporation & Anr., the Delhi High Court ordered cancellation of “AiC ARUN”, holding that merely adding a prefix cannot sanitize infringement when the dominant part of the mark, “ARUN” is identical to a prior.
https://t.co/QJuQxSUQ8H
In a recent trade dress dispute between Emami Limited and Dabur India Limited, the Delhi High Court restrained Dabur from using the impugned “Cool King Thanda Tael” packaging.
Author: Mohandas Konnanath
https://t.co/ytGHJpNH9v
ame helps, but distinctiveness decides. The Madras High Court’s dismissal of P&G’s rectification petitions in the VICKS VAPORUB vs VAPORIN dispute highlights a core trademark principle: common, descriptive elements cannot be monopolised.
https://t.co/Y8HFNy45rW
We are delighted to share that RNA, Technology and IP Attorneys has been recognised in the World Trademark Review WTR1000 – World’s Leading Trademark Professionals, reaffirming the firm’s strong position in the global trademark landscape.
#wtr1000#trademark#law