Wonder ROC

[Jack Posobiec @JackPosobiec]

Fulton Sheen explained that since God is the source of our rights, the communist must wage war against God in order to deny the true source of our rights

[Peter Navarro @RealPNavarro]

🧵 Last Friday, President Trump shut the White House door on CNN, MSNOW and Politico over what he described as fabricated reporting.

By Sunday, the President had vanished from America’s live TV screens.
You might assume one of those outlets was responsible. You’d be wrong.

It was FOX.

[Enior @EniorJimenez]

El Cristianismo no es una vertiente del judaísmo: el judaísmo, de hecho, fue codificado en los siglos 2 a 8 d.C., en la era medieval, muchos después de que los escritos apostólicos ya habían sido inscripturados a mediados del primer siglo d.C.

El Cristianismo no tiene sus raíces en el judaísmo, tiene sus raíces en la fe de los patriarcas y profetas bajo el Antiguo Testamento: ¿cuál es la diferencia? El judaísmo es una religión que se inventó entre la diáspora judía en Babilonia en ausencia de un templo y un sacerdocio en función: es la religión de la sinagoga, la religión de los fariseos. Esta religión era una mezcla de verdades de la Torá (la ley) con las extravagantes interpretaciones midrásicas —la supuesta «ley oral»— que no solo añadían elementos a la revelación bíblica del Antiguo Testamento, sino que, en muchos aspectos, contravenían los mandamientos expresos de Dios. Precisamente lo que Jesús de Nazaret condenó públicamente y, por tanto, la razón por la que el Sanedrín, los líderes del judaísmo, lo querían muerto.

Por tanto, afirmar que el Cristianismo tiene su origen en el judaísmo equivale a decir que nuestra fe proviene de los anticristos: aquellos que rechazan a Jesús como Mesías y observan las tradiciones de los rabinos. Esto es absurdo, es blasfemo; es una herejía moderna que domina el ámbito académico actual, tanto evangélico como católico.

Tengan cuidado: esto, en última instancia, solo servirá para socavar el verdadero depósito apostólico de la Iglesia y judaizar nuestra santísima fe cristiana. En palabras de nuestro gran rey y Señor:

— "Y Jesús les dijo: Estad atentos y guardaos de la levadura de los fariseos y saduceos. Entonces entendieron que no les había dicho que se guardaran de la levadura de los panes, sino de la enseñanza de los fariseos y saduceos" (Mateo 16:6, 12).

Escuchen este testimonio de Jana Ben-nun, hija de padre judío, quien vino a la Fe Cristiana como adulta y, tras una extensa investigación, detectó lo que está en el centro de nuestra geopolítica actual: el sionismo, que no es más que la aplicación política del judaísmo.

Edúcate, y no caigas bajo el hechizo de esta levadura de los fariseos y saduceos: enemigos de Cristo, enemigos de la humanidad.

[OnlMaps @onlmaps]

95% of ocean plastic comes from only 10 rivers

[Mandrilandia @MandrilandiaX]

Creer que "redistribuir la riqueza" acabará la pobreza, es como creer que promediar la nota del aula, acabará con la ignorancia del que no estudia.

Esto sólo es invento del socialismo.

[Jack Posobiec @JackPosobiec]

They went from calling replacement migration a conspiracy theory to admitting it but calling you a racist if you notice

[STUNNER @Cr7Godbrand]

We have burned down every norm, every tradition, every guardrail in this society so women could be "finally happy and empowered."

And what do we have to show for it? The most miserable generation of women in human history.

More doped up than ever. More medicated, more therapized, more anxious, more on edge.

Empathy turned into a mental illness. they'll cry for criminals and strangers but feel nothing for their own husband and kids.

They'll tell a waiter "thank you" for bringing them a drink, but tell their husband who bought them a car it's "bare minimum."

They'll sign to save puppies from being aborted but refuse to sign to save babies from being aborted.

They hate marriage, hate motherhood, hate men, hate the country that gave them everything, and they vote for the exact people who want to destroy it all.

Look at the progression…it's insane when you lay it out:

It started as "I want to vote."

Then "I want to work outside the home."

Then "I want birth control so I can have sex without consequences."

Then "I want to have sex like a man with no shame."

Then "I want a no-fault divorce so I can leave whenever I feel unhappy."

Then "I want to kill the baby if the pill fails."

Then "I want to kill the baby up to the day of birth."

Then "I want to be celebrated for killing the baby."

Then "It's understandable and brave to strangle your own kids if motherhood is too stressful, she needs support not jail."

From freedom to abortion to transing kids to justifying infanticide.

Tell me, what the fuck is the next step after that? 🤷🏿‍♂️

[STUNNER @Cr7Godbrand]

Women were never oppressed. There was NO oppression. What women call oppression today was just PROTECTION.

Let me break it down for you:

1. VOTING:
Women say "we couldn't vote." But back then, voting was not a right, it was a RESPONSIBILITY. Only people who owned property, paid heavy taxes, held public office, or were drafted to DIE in wars could vote.

100% of the people dying in wars were men. You want to vote to send men to war, while you sit at home safe? Makes zero sense. Voting was linked to the DRAFT. You vote, you go to war. Men understood that.

2. BANKING:
"You needed your husband's signature!" Yes, because by LAW, a woman was LEGALLY PROTECTED from debt. Her husband was the head of household and by law HE was 100% liable for ALL debts she made. If she borrowed and couldn't pay, THEY CAME FOR HIM, not her. Creditors went to jail or lost everything - the husband.

So of course his signature was needed. He is the one who goes to prison if you don't pay.

3. PROPERTY - COVERTURE:
They cry about coverture. Coverture meant when you marry, your property merges under ONE name, the husband's, because there was ONE tax filing per household, not two like today. ONE household, ONE name, ONE tax.

It was not to steal from you. It was because the husband was legally responsible for you. If you got sued, he paid. If you owed taxes, he paid. He took your debts too.

These men had mothers they worshipped and daughters they would die for. They were not oppressing women, they were covering them.

4. CONTROLLING WOMEN'S BODIES:
The biggest lie. Back then there were NO abortion pills, NO condoms that worked, NO diapers, NO formula, NO government money to raise a child alone as a single mother, NO good jobs for women to survive alone.

Who bears the most risk in unprotected sex? THE WOMAN. She gets pregnant for 9 months, she risks death during childbirth, which was very common then.

So what did society do? They made sure women stayed virgins until marriage, and made sure men MARRIED them before sex. That is not oppression, that is PROTECTION from becoming a single mother with 3 kids and no food.

And it WORKED. Single motherhood rate was less than 5%. Marriage rate was 90%. Children grew up with fathers.

Today you have "freedom" - 40% single mothers, fatherless homes, abortions everywhere, and women crying that men don't want them.

There was never oppression. There was a system that understood biology and protected women from the consequences of their own choices.

[Jack Posobiec @JackPosobiec]

We have heard about nothing but toxic masculinity for the past 20 years

It is now time to address toxic feminism

[Bill Mitchell @mitchellvii]

⛽️ A GASOLINE STORY:

WIFE: "Four dollars and fifteen cents a gallon! I nearly fell over at the pump. Thanks a lot, Trump. And that whole mess with Iran."

HUSBAND: "Whoa, whoa. Not so fast, hon."

WIFE: "Not so fast? Gas is through the roof!"

HUSBAND: "Here's the crazy part. Oil is actually about forty bucks a barrel CHEAPER than it was under Biden. The barrel isn't the problem."

WIFE: "Then why am I paying four fifteen?!"

HUSBAND: "Refining. Turning the oil into gasoline. That's the bottleneck. And get this - we haven't built a major new refinery in this country since 1977."

WIFE: "Nineteen seventy-SEVEN? I was in high school!"

HUSBAND: "Not one. And we keep shutting down the ones we've got. California alone is closing about eighteen percent of its refineries!"

WIFE: "Who shuts down a refinery when gas costs this much?!"

HUSBAND: "The Democrats. They spent fifty years regulating them to death - permits, lawsuits, fees, and a promise to ban gas cars. Who's going to spend a billion dollars building something Washington swears it's going to outlaw?"

WIFE: "So it was never really about Iran."

HUSBAND: "Iran nudges the barrel a little. But the real story? We've got more oil than any country on Earth and we STILL import six million barrels a day, because we can't refine our own."

WIFE: "That is absolutely insane."

HUSBAND: "Here's the good news. Trump just broke ground on the first new refinery in almost fifty years, down in Texas."

WIFE: "So I've been blaming Trump and HE is the only one actually fixing it?"

HUSBAND: "Now you're getting it."

WIFE: "Wow, I had no idea..."

[Gunther Eagleman™ @GuntherEagleman]

Kevin Reddington just outed the holdout.

It’s a man.
He won’t return not guilty.
And the defense is furious.

Reddington’s pitch: this juror is “refusing to follow the law,” so yank him. Translation: eleven people wanted Lindsay Clancy to walk, one wouldn’t, and now they want the hero kicked off the panel for not collapsing under majority pressure.

Three murdered kids.
One man who wouldn’t fold.
That’s not a rogue juror. That’s a backbone.

[Dan The Man, Always with a Plan @jfellpollright]

Maria Bartiromo has been fired from Fox News after she was about to report on China's involvement in the 2020 stolen election. She was working with the White House to prepare this story. Maria has hired a high profile attorney. This is a developing story, but I would like to point out that the White House never went through Laura Ingraham, Jesse Watters or Sean Hannity to get this story out. They only went through Maria because she is the only journalist who will risk it all for America and President Trump. She has always been a MAGA patriot. God bless, Maria Bartiromo.

[Eric Daugherty @EricLDaugh]

🚨 JUST NOW: US Marine and Medal of Honor recipient Dakota Meyer just PERFECTLY mic dropped the Lindsay Clancy supporters on national TV

"Who CARES how she's feeling? Nobody cares. I hope she is suffering a tenth of what her child was suffering as she stood behind her child with her workout band. And she CHOKED and listened and felt her child squirm and fight against this!"

"And we're worried about how this woman's filling?! Nobody cares. Nobody cares nor SHOULD we care how she's feeling. I'm sure she is struggling. SHE SHOULD BE."

"And then she didn't just do it to one. She did it two more times. This is absolutely absurd, absurd and appalling that we are trying to find empathy over finding justice for these three innocent children who this woman brutally m*rdered."

"She knew what she was doing...she is nothing less than pure evil."

💯💯

[Jack Posobiec @JackPosobiec]

I have never seen anything like this

Lindsay Clancy's lawyer just completely violated the jury deliberations by reading in court that it is an 11-1 split of Not Guilty and 1 male holdout refusing to go along

How is this not open jury tampering?

Mistral. Disbar

[Jack @jackunheard]

Liberal women say Charlie Kirk deserved to be killed because of the things he said.

Liberal women say Lindsay Clancy deserves to be free because she killed her children.

Liberal women are a cancer to society.

[Matt Van Swol @mattvanswol]

🚨#BREAKING: Judge declares mistrial in Lindsay Clancy murder case after hung jury.

A single LONE MAN held out against the many to not let her off.

GOD BLESS THAT MAN!!!!!!

[Kentucky Girl @Kentuckygirl1]

Being black is hard...so I killed a white boy.

Being a mom is hard.....so I killed my children.

Being injured is hard.....so I assassinated a CEO.

Being LGBTQ is hard......so I assassinated a conservative.

Time to end the excuses era.

It's time for the JUSTICE ERA.

[Deep Leaks @DeepLeaksHQ]

🚨 GLOBALISM JUST DIED IN DAVOS

Howard Lutnick just walked into the lion’s den — and told the World Economic Forum exactly what they didn’t want to hear.

“Globalism has failed.”

Not whispered.
Not softened.

Declared — on their own stage.

He dismantled the entire WEF doctrine in minutes:
• Offshoring hollowed out the West
• Cheap labor destroyed innovation
• Net Zero made Europe dependent on China
• Sovereignty begins with borders
• Nations must control their industry, energy, and medicine

Then came the line that shook the room:

“Why would Europe agree to Net Zero when they don’t even make a battery?”

That’s the truth globalists can’t answer.

Green agendas without industry.

Climate pledges without sovereignty.

Moral posturing while outsourcing power to Beijing.

America First isn’t isolation.

It’s independence.

And Lutnick made it crystal clear:

The old model is finished.

The globalist experiment has failed.
And the future belongs to nations that put their people first.

Davos just heard the obituary — live.

[Jack Posobiec @JackPosobiec]

The idea of 3 men holding out on the Lindsay Clancy jury is an example to us all

Men standing up to liberal women is how we fix all of society

[Paulo Spitzbarth 🇧🇷🇩🇪🇮🇱 @PauloSpitzbarth]

🚨🇺🇸 CAR@LHO, QUE LAPADA! 🔥🔥🔥

CNN: “Este é um imigrante sem documentos...”

Miller: “Eles estavam aqui ILEGALMENTE?”

CNN: “Quero que esta seja uma discussão de boa-fé...”

Miller: “Quando você usa uma linguagem feita para ocultar a verdade, isso NÃO é boa-fé. Um ESTRANGEIRO ILEGAL é um ESTRANGEIRO ILEGAL. Eles não são ‘imigrantes sem documentos’.”

CNN: “Stephen, estamos tentando humanizar o debate...”

Miller: “Humanizar? Então vamos humanizar o Código Penal também. O assaltante de banco passa a ser ‘especialista em retirada sem agendamento prévio’. O estelionatário vira ‘empreendedor de narrativas financeiras alternativas’. O cara que entra na sua casa sem convite é só um ‘visitante com documentação pendente’. Que tal?”

CNN: “Isso é uma analogia grosseira.”

Miller: “Grosseira é fingir que a lei federal some porque a redação da CNN inventou um eufemismo mais fofo. ‘Sem documentos’ soa como alguém que esqueceu a carteira no Uber. Não. É alguém que cruzou a fronteira sem autorização, ficou, e agora a imprensa trata o estatuto jurídico como se fosse uma questão de estilo de escrita.”

CNN: “Mas muitos contribuem para a economia...”

Miller: “Ah, o argumento clássico: o crime deixa de ser crime se a pessoa lava prato ou constrói telhado. Pelo mesmo critério, o contrabandista de cigarro também ‘contribui’, gera emprego no transporte. Quer que a gente chame ele de ‘empreendedor logístico informal’? A CNN topa?”

CNN: “Você está polarizando.”

Miller: “Não. Eu estou recusando o dicionário de marketing. Vocês mudam a palavra, depois acusam quem usa o termo legal de ser ‘desumano’. É o truque mais velho do livro: primeiro suaviza o vocabulário, depois declara vitória moral. Os Estados Unidos já cansaram desse teatro. Chamem o que é. Ou admitam que o objetivo nunca foi clareza — foi controle da narrativa.”