I am so shattered by this YouTuber and his wife for aborting their disabled baby, not only because it’s evil incarnate, but because I’ve been in a similar position with my daughter Sage. I’ve gotten bad news. I’ve sat with it, ruminated on it, and lost sleep over it, but ending her life never crossed my mind. And thank God, because that bad news was wrong. Medical testing can be deeply flawed.
When I was 20 weeks pregnant with Sage, her measurements reflected that her head had stopped growing, and her brain. I was told I still had “options” at 20 weeks, to which I gave a firm Fk you to. Within a week, her measurements were perfectly normal, the error the previous week was the result of how she had been positioned that day.
At 34 weeks, I developed oligohydramnios (low amniotic fluid). This went undiagnosed for a month despite my insistence that something wasn’t right. Finally, a doctor caught it and I was sent to be induced immediately (July 2).
I was given an antibiotic immediately, as a precaution for the oligohydramnios, however, it sent me into anaphylaxis. The Benadryl they gave me to save our lives did, but it caused hallucinations.
I was monitored overnight and induced the following morning. Sage arrived healthy and happy and perfect, she however had a tilt in her neck— A 30° rotation of C1 on C2, a mild shift in her jaw and the plates in her head, the result of her position and the low fluid going undiagnosed for as long as it did. This would result in 8 years of physical therapy at Shriners hospital, a baby helmet, and several other ongoing interventions to this day.
Today, she is almost 16, happy, beautiful, brilliant, kind, funny, and an absolute blessing. She is the top of her class, an animal whisperer, and a talented singer. She loves history and wants to be a psychologist or a vet.
Whatever is in the heart of a mother who would conditionally love her child, who would place her own safety above her child’s, and who would see her child as anything less than perfect, is not in my heart, and I thank God for my beautiful children and an unburdened soul.
Most of us are repulsed by what we’re seeing in politics right now and that’s exactly why One Nation is gaining momentum.
We just want normalcy back: paying the rent, putting food on the table, and living in a sane world.
Well said Lucy!
The Prime Minister says “lessons must be learned” over the death of Henry Nowak.
He then goes on to say “there is no two-tier policing” despite being read a line by Nigel Farage, from the Police racism guidelines, which instructs officers to police unequally.
They don’t want to change anything. Let’s be clear.
When George Floyd died, they demanded change to policing in Britain. They got it. The change they got was to make the laws that saw Henry die without a shred of dignity.
You cannot hate this government enough.
Je me suis longtemps passionné pour la psychologie, et une période m'obsède plus que toutes les autres.
L'après-guerre.
Le moment où des chercheurs se sont posé la question la plus dérangeante du siècle: comment l'Allemagne nazie avait-elle transformé des pères de famille ordinaires en bourreaux de camp?
La réponse, ils ne l'ont pas trouvée chez des monstres. Ils l'ont trouvée chez des hommes parfaitement banals.
Hannah Arendt a appelé ça la banalité du mal. L'historien Christopher Browning, en étudiant le bataillon de réserve 101 (des policiers d'âge mûr, des pères, des commerçants), a montré que ce ne sont pas des fanatiques qui ont fusillé des civils, mais des hommes normaux incapables de désobéir au cadre dominant.
Puis vint Milgram. À Yale, environ deux tiers de gens ordinaires ont infligé ce qu'ils croyaient être des décharges mortelles, simplement parce qu'une autorité en blouse blanche le leur ordonnait. L'expérience de la prison de Stanford a montré la même chose sous un autre angle: donnez à quelqu'un un rôle et un cadre, et il s'y conformera jusqu'à l'inhumain.
La leçon n'est pas allemande. Elle est humaine.
Le mécanisme s'active dès qu'un cadre moral dominant fait craindre la sanction sociale plus que ne compte le témoignage de ses propres yeux. L'individu cesse de voir ce qu'il voit. Il voit ce que le cadre l'autorise à voir.
Maintenant, regardez Southampton.
Henry Nowak, 18 ans, poignardé, allongé au sol, répète aux policiers « j'ai été poignardé », « je ne peux plus respirer ».
Réponse de l'officier: « I don't think you have, mate. »
Pendant ce temps, son meurtrier retourne la situation d'une phrase: il aurait été victime d'une agression raciste. Quatre mots ont suffi pour déplacer le soupçon de l'agresseur vers la victime.
Et l'officier a obéi. Pas à un ordre. À un cadre.
Un cadre qui lui a appris, pendant des années, qu'une plainte pour racisme est l'accusation la plus dangereuse de sa carrière. Plus dangereuse, dans son réflexe conditionné, qu'un corps qui se vide de son sang devant lui.
Exactement le mécanisme de Milgram, de Browning. Un homme normal qui cesse de croire ses propres yeux parce qu'un cadre moral lui a appris ce qu'il devait craindre.
C'est précisément ça qui me terrifie.
Souvenez-vous: le monde entier s'est agenouillé pour quatre mots, « I can't breathe ». Des entreprises, des gouvernements, des stades entiers.
Henry a prononcé les mêmes mots, en train de mourir. Il n'y aura ni genou à terre, ni hashtag, ni minute de silence.
Parce que sa mort ne sert pas le cadre. Elle le contredit.
Et un système qui apprend à une société entière à faire passer l'accusation de racisme avant les faits, avant le corps, avant la vie, n'est pas une posture morale inoffensive.
C'est une machine à fabriquer des hommes qui, face à un enfant en train de mourir, choisissent les menottes.
What bothers me the most about the Nowak case is how he had no chance. He was stabbed, and in other cases maybe he would have received assistance, maybe the perpetrator would have run away and then people would have helped, an ambulance would have come.
But he wasn't just stabbed. Then a systematic process began. The knife was hidden by a family member. A second family member made the call to police and lied. This set in motion the police response which judged Nowak the perpetrator without interviewing him or anyone. He was cuffed and couldn't even speak as he was cautioned that he was arrested.
It wasn't just the police response, it was that he lay wounded and dying and those around him were all a family, involved in hiding the weapon, lying to police and telling police when they arrived that Nowak wasn't stabbed.
The whole system was against him, in his own country he was completely alone, surrounded, with no chance to survive. From the moment the perpetrator decided to stab him, he had no chance. The entire system worked against him.
And when you see the video of the perpetrator and family, they act like this is a completely normal day...like they would just walk away and it was fine. No sense of shock, no sense of shame.
The entire mainstream media has spent two weeks harassing and abusing Rupert Lowe.
He stands up in Parliament, and reads out the harrowing testimony from multiple rape gang survivors.
Not a single channel/paper covers the testimony.
That tells you everything you need to know.
We have just listened to the most horrific statements read out by Rupert Lowe. Never in my life have I been so angry, disgusted and upset with the overwhelming feeling of wanting to vomit. God help those poor children. In my opinion the perpetrators should hang alongside every single person who contributed to the torture of these children. We know who they are and will no longer be told to keep our mouths shut - how are we expected to live alongside these MONSTERS ?! And lets be clear, had Rupert not brought this to everyone’s attention, we would still be unaware of the extent of the atrocities. Thank you @RupertLowe10 🙏🏻🇬🇧
Voltaire passed away today in 1778.
There are two quotes of his I always come back to:
"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."
and
“Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.”
The fact that we are having a hard time throwing America a 250th birthday party because leftists are threatening to kill everyone involved is the most zeitgeist shit I’ve ever seen in my life
This is how my 911 call went yesterday, it was INSANE:
Dispatch: “911 what is your emergency?”
Me: “I need an officer to take a report. I was attacked and robbed of at least $1,500 worth of property at Delaney Hall.”
Dispatch: “sir who robbed you?”
Me: “the masked chaos agents that are apparently allowed to run our streets while officers are nowhere to be seen.”
Dispatch: “sir, are you saying ICE robbed you?”
Me: “are you stupid? No I’m not saying ICE robbed me. I’m talking about the protestors who attack people every single night outside of Delaney Hall.”
Dispatch: “Sir, they are simply peacefully protesting.”
Me: “did you miss the part where they robbed and attacked me? You can keep your braindead opinions to yourself - you’re a 911 dispatcher and I was robbed. I need an officer not your stupid input.”
I will be filing a FOIA for this 911 call with a Newark dispatcher. The first dispatcher straight up hung up on me.
JOHN CLAUSER, 2022 PHYSICS NOBEL PRIZE WINNER:
"I can very confidently assert, there is no climate emergency.
As much as it may upset many people, my message is the planet is NOT in peril.
Atmospheric CO2 and methane have negligible effect on the climate.
The policies government have been implementing are totally unnecessary and should be eliminated.
So far, [we] have totally misidentified what is the dominant process in controlling the climate, and all of the various models are based on incomplete and incorrect physics.
The dominant process, is “the cloud-sunlight-reflexivity thermostat mechanism.
Clouds are all bright white, and they reflected 90% of the sunlight back into space making them the most crucial yet most overlooked aspect of the climate system.
Two-thirds of the Earth are ocean. The Pacific Ocean alone is half the Earth. The average cloud cover for the Earth is 67%; about 50% over land and 75% over oceans.
I claim that the above conspicuous properties of clouds are the missing part of the puzzle."
When American POWs tried to sneak her notes with their personal information to tell their families they were still alive, she gave them to the North Vietnamese. Some of them were beaten to death. You are both commies and you can both fuck off.
A very sad announcement.
I have just been convicted a second time for 'hate speech' and it is only due to a technicality that I could not immediately be sent to jail —to the judge's frustration.
In an ironic turn of events it's actually thanks to my previous prison sentence (for memes in a private group chat) that I am now still free —in a physical sense, at least.
Call me naive but I didn't think they would take it this far, given that this precedent criminalises many of the arguments used by even the most moderate politicians critical of mass migration.
In February 2024 I gave a lecture at Catholic University Leuven wherein I linked mass migration to crime and a deterioration of our quality of life. Every single point I made was 100% the truth and based on scientific evidence.
Cynically, even the judge that convicted me admits as much by writing in his verdict: “Even if all of the statements made by Van Langenhove are based on scientific evidence and statistics, it makes no difference to the criminal intent. Van Langenhove is not charged with spreading false information. He is charged with presenting facts in a way that incites hatred against persons on the grounds of one or more of the protected criteria in the Anti-Racism Law.”
That's a lot of words just to say he wants to send me to prison for speaking the truth.
Even the regime media write: "It did not matter to the court that Van Langenhove was quoting scientific sources. The judge argued that Van Langenhove's main message was that a big part of the societal problems like insecurity, housing shortages and lowering educational standards are due to mass migration."
You may think the regime media are being sympathetic to me in the first sentence, but in reality they are warning people: even if you speak the truth, if you go against our narrative, we will crush you in every way possible.
Both the public prosecutor and the judge did not present a single real argument as to how or against whom I would have incited hatred. So even if I would accept their crazy, dystopic law, I still did not break it.
The only argument they present is that I created a "hostile atmosphere of us versus them” in regards to migrants. But even this silly argument (which is not even a punishable offence) is not true. To me, the deadly disease is self-hatred and one of its worst symptoms is replacement migration. My enemy is thus NOT the migrants themselves but those orchestrating the mass migration.
Sadly, in Belgium, evidence is not needed and ‘vibes’ are enough to put someone in jail.
Given the fact that I have another court case coming up in September and that I have a dozen active criminal investigations for hate speech, time is running out for me. I have already paid more than €420,000 in legal fees and there is no ending in sight. I have been in an intense battle of attrition for eight years and must now regroup to make sure I can still win.
If you want to help me, you can do so via the links below. If you can help in other ways, please contact me via DM.
If you live in a country that still has free speech, never let them touch it, however noble they make the motives sound, because this is where it leads to.