ROSAMASSA

LUTO POR JUSTIÇA E IGUALDADE A TODOS, VOTO e COBRO, SEM POLÍTICOS DE ESTIMAÇÃO, NOS SOMOS PATRÕES E POLÍTICOS NOS DEVEM RESPEITO E OBEDIÊNCIA.NUNCA IDOLATRE

[ROSAMASSA @ROSAMASSA19]

@Pontifex ACCEPT JESUS WITH JUSTIC
DONT ADOPT COMMUNIST LAWS TO PROTECT BARRABÁS.
GOD BLESSED YOU AND OPEN YOUR EYES BEFORE BE TOO LATE

[ROSAMASSA @ROSAMASSA19]

UNFORTUNATELY

[ROSAMASSA @ROSAMASSA19]

https://t.co/gJ24UjpzXQ

[Não é o Léo Lins @leolinshumor]

Lula esqueceu de apagar o vídeo do perfil dele KKKKKKKKKKK

[Martin De Luca @emd_worldwide]

Since February 2025, Brazilian authorities have been claiming they were ready to defend Justice Alexandre de Moraes in the Rumble/Trump Media case in the United States.

The AGU said it would act, that it was coordinating with U.S. counsel and preparing filings. Then the case advanced for 460 days and nobody showed up in court.

Instead, Brazil’s institutions went to extraordinary lengths to successfully prevent ordinary service of process through the Hague Convention. And now, after a U.S. federal judge authorized email service, a collection of Brazilian authorities are suddenly calling this a diplomatic crisis.

Why did it have to come to this?

If Brazil’s position is that Justice Moraes acted lawfully, within his authority, and in compliance with both U.S. and Brazilian law, as well as international treaties, the path is simply to appear in U.S. court and say so.

What is harder to explain is why announce for fifteen months that Brazil would defend Moraes, then decline to appear when the defense was actually required, and now treat a court authorized summons as an international diplomatic incident?

Helpful timeline of the facts

Brazilian outlets reported as early as February 21, 2025 that the AGU would defend Moraes in the Rumble/Trump Media case. A few days later, on February 25, 2025, the AGU itself published that it “will act” in the case and that the defense would be handled in partnership with an international law firm authorized to practice before U.S. courts. It also said that, at the STF’s request, AGU had already begun arrangements for legal action. https://t.co/4au9Oor1SV

Then, on June 6, 2025, UOL reported that AGU had instructed its office in the United States to monitor the new Rumble/Trump Media process and that the AGU “should present a formal manifestation to the American court if the process advances.”
https://t.co/nMTLFWYdLf

On July 8, 2025, SBT reported that AGU was preparing “defense drafts” in case it decided to act officially on behalf of Brazil, and noted that once Moraes was officially notified he would have 21 days to respond or seek dismissal.
https://t.co/CGIvoSoJKQ

Yesterday, it was widely reported that the STF is now discussing with AGU, the Ministry of Justice and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs how to react to the email service, including possible diplomatic instruments. https://t.co/gOlWoio3fy

[Ivanildo Terceiro 🔸🌐 @ivanildoiii]

Gilmar Mendes confessa que o inconstitucional Inquérito das Fake News será usado durante as eleições para censurar os críticos dos ministros do Supremo.

Isso por si só é causa de impeachment.

[Janaina Paschoal @JanainaDoBrasil]

Precisamos dar voz a quem já não pode falar! Eu sei que o áudio é verdadeiro, pois, à época, o próprio Major me ligou para relatar tudo isso e avisar que havia postado os áudios em suas redes com militares. Eu amo meu País, por isso, precisamos construir uma alternativa! Retirem Flávio Bolsonaro da corrida presidencial. Ele vai nos subtrair uma chance!

[Felipe Moura Brasil @FMouraBrasil]

Na rachadinha, a secretária parlamentar não “devolve” dinheiro ao deputado ou chefe de gabinete, porque o dinheiro não é deles.

Ela entrega, ou paga despesas de superiores, para manter o cargo em gabinete.

Já eles se apropriam do salário alheio (pago pelo Estado com dinheiro do povo), utilizando-se da facilidade que o cargo proporciona. É peculato.

Em português mais simples: coisa de ladrão.

[Felipe Moura Brasil @FMouraBrasil]

A alegação frequente de políticos cuja rachadinha foi descoberta é que o dinheiro entregue por funcionários do gabinete era para quitar algum empréstimo anterior feito por esses políticos aos funcionários.

No bolsonarismo, já é tradição.

E nunca há registros desse “empréstimo”.

[ROSAMASSA @ROSAMASSA19]

@VictorScarpitti @Anarkiahitech @EuzileneRi53353 @Bruno__SCCP @andreshalders Malandro tu não respeita as mulheres vai respeitar quem?