RacketeerX

[RacketeerX @RacketeerX]

After months of their continued assault on $CYBL @CyberluxC, Who is @theJacksonHolt? The anonymous account has for months spread a damning narrative behind the curtains(pun intended).

[RacketeerX @RacketeerX]

Before posting on his LinkedIn page https://t.co/CtuoLU2vVP and seeming to admit his involvement in the coordinated attack - did he possibly collude with Atlantic Wave Holdings, the Receiver in the ongoing case, others in an attempt to further damage a US Defense Company? $CYBL

[RacketeerX @RacketeerX]

When you spend 9 months posting one side of a story, you aren’t a journalist - you’re spreading propaganda with an agenda. The same propaganda that was denied on the record in the same court filings by @CyberluxC and executives. $CYBL

[RacketeerX @RacketeerX]

Why would he go so far to possibly submit the anonymous letter in the Atlantic Wave case, the same case that has been continually pushed into public view and only framing the one sided narrative by this account? $CYBL

[RacketeerX @RacketeerX]

And did Jim Curtin submit the anonymous letter in the Atlantic Wave case — potentially on behalf of a company he advises, partially owned by a foreign government — in attempt to damage Cyberluxs $cybl reputation, interfering with its business operations & harming shareholders.

[RacketeerX @RacketeerX]

The real question isn’t just why Jim Curtin would attack a U.S. defense company @CyberluxC — it’s why he would appear to be collaborating with a foreign government and defense firm, @WBGroup_PL, to target a competitor and its executives @billmaadar60848 @MDSAdvisor. $CYBL

[RacketeerX @RacketeerX]

Are they working with AWH to weaponize the court system and coordinating lawsuits against Cyberlux — which is clearly business interference — in an effort to irreparably harm the company & block its acquisition of Datron , including its IP, mfg capabilities, and workforce? $cybl

[RacketeerX @RacketeerX]

@CJClarkfitness @WBGroup_PL An interesting observation. Business interference and stock manipulation - possibly attempting to cause irreparable harm. There are a lot of questions that call for answers. $cybl
"I vacilate between being proud of what I do at times, and alternately embarrassed and ashamed."

[RacketeerX @RacketeerX]

Who is Jim Curtin and why would he potentially make @CyberluxC $cybl and @MDSAdvisor @billmaadar60848 the target of attacks? What possible motive could they have?

https://t.co/0ZvtcE3oYO

Why would he now attempt to shift eyes off of his actions? @SECGov @TheJusticeDept

[RacketeerX @RacketeerX]

There are more questions coming - Why did Jim Curtin make his LinkedIn post a mere hours the initial report tying him to this anonymous "reporter"? $cybl

Where would @WBGroup_PL fit into this possible scheme?

[RacketeerX @RacketeerX]

In fact, if you place the 49 at the end instead of the beginning - - they’re the same number. The date on the tweet and the date of the email - also identical. This deactivated X account reactivated as @6vzcqjynk5 (JoJohannsen's proton-mail backup email) per investigators. $cybl

[RacketeerX @RacketeerX]

@WBGroup_PL @wbgroupamerica @SECGov @TheJusticeDept @DeptofDefense @CyberluxC

[RacketeerX @RacketeerX]

Why would an advisor in the defense industry make @CyberluxC and leadership @MDSAdvisor @billmaadar60848 the target of a months long series of attacks? What possible motive could they have?

https://t.co/Y0ta9V192y

[RacketeerX @RacketeerX]

Was this an effort to take down a competitor?

Was this in coordination with the Atlantic Wave 25+ legal attacks on Cyberlux in an attempt to drive down the stock price?

This could be a clear case of business interference and $CYBL stock manipulation.

@SECGov @TheJusticeDept

[RacketeerX @RacketeerX]

Would @WBGroup_PL @WBGroupAmerica have authorized a coordinated attack? @SECGov @TheJusticeDept @DeptofDefense

More connections seem to validate the Jim Curtin connection with the targeted attack against @CyberluxC and its executives.

https://t.co/3Oibpa0kNi