The attorney hired by Wisconsin Republicans to review the 2020 election performed his initial work on a computer at the New Berlin public library because he didn’t have a computer of his own.
He was paid $11,000/month by taxpayers soon afterward.
@mckenziecahoun @GreenesLlama @LibertyNeverSlp@RepMTG You misread the claim. Congress is allowed to regulate the individual under the "well regulated" clause. That was the claim all along.
@mckenziecahoun @GreenesLlama @LibertyNeverSlp@RepMTG Yes? Congress is allowed to define what "well regulated" means. That was their point. Over and over again they stated that the militia = individual because of Heller. Their claim is exactly the same as mine.
@mckenziecahoun @GreenesLlama @LibertyNeverSlp@RepMTG Neither the llama nor myself ever claimed different. You were the one that went off half-cocked not taking the time to read what was being said
The individual right to bare arms is enshrined in the 2A. HOWEVER congress has the ability to regulate an individual who is baring arms
@mckenziecahoun @GreenesLlama @LibertyNeverSlp@RepMTG Irrelevant to the discussion. Has nothing to do with Congress having the ability to regulate. Congress did not make the law that was being challenged.
@mckenziecahoun @GreenesLlama @LibertyNeverSlp@RepMTG Who said unchecked regulation? Not me? Congress can regulate within the bounds of the 2A as defined by Heller.
Are you lying again?
@mckenziecahoun @GreenesLlama @LibertyNeverSlp@RepMTG Again, the individual right to bare arms is not under discussion. By myself or the llama.
So you're arguing against something that no one is saying.
Congrats?
@mckenziecahoun @GreenesLlama @LibertyNeverSlp@RepMTG The individual right to carry a gun is not what is under discussion.
So...ok? What you posted doesn't refute that Congress has the ability to regulate. Per this ruling Congress can make a law that says an individual has to go to 2 weeks of training every year to be a gun owner
@mckenziecahoun @GreenesLlama @LibertyNeverSlp@RepMTG A picture is not a link. Clicking on the link llama posted absolutely does lead you to this site.
You're wrong.
@mckenziecahoun @GreenesLlama @LibertyNeverSlp@RepMTG I mean, llama posted it repeatedly. But if you need to see it again I'll be helpful and repost (below).
There is an individual right to gun ownership. However congress has the right to regulate under the well-regulated clause in the 2A.
@mckenziecahoun @GreenesLlama @LibertyNeverSlp@RepMTG For the record, you never posted any links that I can see. The llama has (and they work).
I guess you really are a liar.
@mckenziecahoun @GreenesLlama @LibertyNeverSlp@RepMTG < Let them click and see for themselves. >
Link works for me. You're a no-nothing clown that doesn't know how the courts work. The llama is correct.
@FakeCatfish @GreenesLlama @LiberalWombat @kristin__wilson @MZanona@arogDC@mkraju He blocked me too. But it looked like he wants to goalpost move from “electing house members” to “electing POTUS”.
*But that is not what was being debated*
To summarize: you’re wrong on the house. Completely and indisputably. If you want to discuss impacts to EC I am willing
@FakeCatfish @GreenesLlama @LiberalWombat @kristin__wilson @MZanona@arogDC@mkraju We understand numbers just fine. Reducing the number of people in each district by expanding seats distills the crazy into numerous pockets allowing *more* lunatics to be elected
It’s you that doesn’t understand. There’s a reason senators are typically not as loony as house mbrs
@OverkillTBP@vdub12 @GreenesLlama @laurenboebert Facts were literally posted that prove you wrong, you decided to ignore them because it completely obliterates your position.
Talk about projection.