@kapil_pand84103@pandulabs If you migrated into the new PANDU, you should consider taking profit/loss and leaving — but it’s up to you. They killed the old PANDU just as it started gaining real community-driven momentum, and replaced it with a new one that’s fully under dev control.
@pandulabs@Pumpfun Why are there no more live discussions about PANDU like there used to be on X Spaces? I have questions: why did the founder wallet sell all PANDU a month ago, and why, when PANDU started going up thanks to the community, did they kill it like this?
@pandulabs@Pumpfun Answers: • The devs lost conviction / cashed out → and left the project to die
• The community revived it on its own → creating new value they didn’t expect
• Instead of letting it grow naturally, they tried to recentralize it and monetize it again
@pandulabs If you migrated into the new PANDU, you should consider taking profit/loss and leaving — but it’s up to you. They killed the old PANDU just as it started gaining real community-driven momentum, and replaced it with a new one that’s fully under dev control.
@pandulabs@Pumpfun Something doesn’t add up with the PANDU migration.
Docs say: “Sign & claim” (non-custodial, on-chain).
Reality: wallet asks to SEND all tokens out.
Also flagged: “This domain is new” + “verified server-side” (why server-side in DeFi?).
That’s not a claim — that’s a transfer.
@shane_mckeown@pandulabs@Pumpfun Migrations are usually for resets — not for holders. Smart money watches where liquidity stays. 23k wallets is not ‘limited’, that’s power. Let’s see which side the market actually chooses.
@pandulabs@Pumpfun 23k holders strong — we don’t need devs or whales to win. Hold the OG PANDU, don’t migrate, don’t feed the reset. If the community stays, we decide the chart.🚀
@pandulabs@Pumpfun To me this isn’t about a ‘fresh start’Dev wallets already sold everything (the founder wallet about 1.5 months ago), and now that PANDU is moving up again, they’re trying to profit from the hype once more. The Pumpfun relaunch fits that narrative more than any long-term building
@PongPingChamp @kokopikoalas@Pumpfun@pandulabs A few minutes ago a significant amount of $PANDU was sold.
How should the community interpret this — moving MC from $PANDU → @kokopikoalas ?
Transparency matters.
@PongPingChamp @kokopikoalas@Pumpfun Just to clarify your connection with @pandulabs several of the earliest Kokopi wallets have significant history with Pandu.
The same overlap appears within the core team. Some current Kokopi core members hosted discussions about Pandu. On-chain and digital history never lies
@kokopikoalas Not accusing anything – just an observation after digging around.
Some voices active in the @pandulabs discussions seem connected here as well, and both projects share a very similar aesthetic and narrative.
Curious if there’s any relationship between the two communities.
@askpandu@askpandu Will $PANDU stay just a meme…
or evolve into a real utility coin?
AI app. NFTs. Game world in progress.
The brand is building.
The real question isn’t hype.
It’s integration.
If the token becomes the engine of the ecosystem
that’s when things change.
Time will tell
@SOLAXYTOKEN Honestly, you’ve clearly lost momentum. The announcements and updates don’t seem to move the market anymore. The potential is still there, but rebuilding confidence will take more than just news — it will take real traction and results.
@100XorDead it looks more like a marketing hook to attract attention, which isn’t necessarily bad. However, there’s no real organic growth behind it. A 100% pump is nice, but without a clear reason — especially with devs holding over 98% of the supply — it raises concerns just 91 holders