Lawyer. Recently appeared(and got noticed) in my 1st Constitution Bench case before the Supreme Court of India. Father of two amazing kids Agastya and Vishwam.
“ No one can persuade another to change. Each of us guards a gate of change that can only be opened from inside. We cannot open the gate of another, either by argument or emotional appeal.”
@TheFactFindr@HindenburgRes So far as Anti suit injunction is concerned. We now have anti-anti suit injunction, meaning that adani can file a case in india that hindenburg cannot take anti suit injunction. Plenty for precedent for this.
@TheFactFindr@HindenburgRes Not correct. Adani can file a suit against Hidenburg in India. Hidenburg took a short position in Indian Market. Released a report for India. Caused alleged injury to a company in India. Many more such things. All give Indian Courts Jurisdiction.
@manuvichar Yes it can be filed. There is a specific provision in the General clauses act for this. Please see Section 10. Computation of time.
Nothing for the court to decide or discuss, field is occupied by legislation.
@CiteCase Money in the hand of accused is Proceeds of crime, it can be seized. And after serizure, complainant can apply to the court for release of the amount
Big boost for caselaw research.
Now, we may not need paid research tools for caselaw research.
The Supreme Court launches eSCR search portal. (both SC and HC judgments available with free text search)
Just check it out here:
🔗https://t.co/9Wym6iGmiT
@niftymaths@indiacharts Bullshit!
Analysts present their view, they are not astrologers. This is v basic.
Markets may behave in a different way than an analyst says, but that does not make some a bad analyst.
Twitter is for meaningful dialogue, not mud slinging. Grow up.