@Scopa4Illinois@DanielHunt91166@BuckStricklan18 2. You have lost more wars that you have started then the ones you have started and won. Vietnam, Afghanistan being the most noticable. So what entitles you to be so ignorant and naive to say that america alone won 2. World wars, and that europe didn’t just as much?
@Scopa4Illinois@DanielHunt91166@BuckStricklan18 1. American soldiers on d-day consisted of 46% of the total amount, present back then, 54% was mainly britain, canada and 1% of that was the rest. USA only joined when you was attacked on pearl harbour and the soviet union was the ones who reached berlin first, not the allies.
@EsBigred@JoeySalads@Emilio2763 1. Your post doesn’t actually compare with other nations.
2. It’s historically. Of course there were a higher rate back in the uncivilized Greenland, because they didn’t have much of an option for survivel when they were in small groups. And also small knowledge of implications.
@EsBigred@JoeySalads@Emilio2763 2. Most westeren countries are in the same low ranges (0.001-0.01), with some places a bit higher historically e.g. Southern europe. No study ranks Greenland number 1, it��s a myth. Talk to me again if you find any actual source saying otherwise. Goodbye.
@EsBigred@JoeySalads@Emilio2763 1. Hi @EsBigred, although your numbers are roughly correct, it doesn’t prove that greenland is the highest in the west, which was your statement.
@TruckerPilot@TheFl0orIsLaVa 2. The fact you acknowledge now that the U.S doesn’t indeed pay for Denmarks defence shows your ignorance from before, also Denmark doesn’t neez to carry itself, because we are part of NATO. Thats the whole point of NATO, helping each other and ensure peace in the world.
@TruckerPilot@TheFl0orIsLaVa 1. Had to comment either way. The U.S only stands for 16% of the NATO “common funded” budget not 95%. Sure they spent a lot on their own military which with article 5 possibly could be used to defend other NATO-members.
@TruckerPilot@TheFl0orIsLaVa I gotta say, i was about to counter-argument your other comments untill i saw this post. I gotta say this tells me all about you as a person, and i don’t like wasting my time on an imbecile person. I know in your brainwashed mind that you may see this as a victory, but it ain’t.
@TruckerPilot@TheFl0orIsLaVa 5. Without maersk, the US military would also face a national security risk, since Maersk is the primary partner for transporting defense equipment and maintaining global logistics. Around 20% of U.S logistics is handled by maersk. Hope this is enough information.
@TruckerPilot@TheFl0orIsLaVa 4. Without maersk (danish) it would cause immediate supply chain disruptions and significant inflation in the US due to the loss of critical port infrastructure and container capacity.
@TruckerPilot@TheFl0orIsLaVa 2. I get that america spend a lot more on their military and therefor contribute with more to NATO, but to say they pay for Denmarks whole defence is ignorant.